Durranistan

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Latest incorrigible distortion of the Cartographical Framework of Sikh Empire and it's exaggeration

@Gotitbro Hey a newcomer this side, So thing I just able to find their was a vicious distortion regarding the actual territorial boundaries of the former Sikh Empire to which all of the contemplated historian agreed upon, but even after the logistics consensus was not in his desired favour (→See here ) close the miscellaneous User, changed it epigraphy and manually obscure such highly anticipated counteraction on the encyclical platform and just claiming large part of history dosent change it reality and this need to be intervened before its too late to tackle this shortcomings issues that's it. ~2026-14069-54 (talk) 16:40, 4 March 2026 (

Your edits to infobox templates in articles

The space characters in the infobox template are there to make it easier for editors to edit them in source mode. Your deleting them was not helpful. Deleting unused fields in the template was another unhelpful thing to do.-- Toddy1 (talk) 11:15, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on 2026 Islamic Center of San Diego shooting

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 2026 Islamic Center of San Diego shooting, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use place-holder names. Please edit the article to include the source's actual author or editor name. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 03:56, 21 May 2026 (UTC)