October 2020

edit

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to PythonAnywhere has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:41, 13 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

February 2021

edit

Information icon Hello, I'm Mpdmonster. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Put water was wet and then proceeded to brag about it on discord. Mpdmonster (talk) 17:49, 4 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CPU_(disambiguation), you may be blocked from editing. Mpdmonster (talk) 18:05, 4 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Craig_Federighi, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Please do not include information that can not be verified. In this instance you put names of Craig Federighi's children even though you could not verify those claims. Mpdmonster (talk) 18:23, 4 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Sorry about all of that; I now acknowledge that I vandalized and will stop. Btw your links don't work. Dullbananas (talk) 18:29, 4 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lemmy (software) (January 1)

edit
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rusalkii was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
One instance of independent coverage is not sufficient for notability, needs at minimum one more. It might just be too soon for this topic, and if the social network takes off it'll have more coverage.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Rusalkii (talk) 22:20, 1 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
Teahouse logo
Hello, Dullbananas! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Rusalkii (talk) 22:20, 1 January 2022 (UTC)Reply