DeadMeat778

Welcome!

Welcome!

Hello, DeadMeat778, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Your first article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
• Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
• and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Rosiestep (talk) 12:47, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: DM (June 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AllCatsAreGrey was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:DM and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– AllCatsAreGrey ^(talk) 19:06, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

Dear @AllCatsAreGrey,

I hope this message finds you well. I am seeking clarification on the suitability of a specific source for the Wikipedia article on Square One Insurance Services.@

I came across a detailed review titled "Square One Insurance Review (2024): Save Money on Insurance" by Calan Breckon, published on his personal blog. The review provides an in-depth account of his experience with Square One Insurance, discussing aspects such as the ease of obtaining a quote, the customization of policies, and the inclusion of home-based business coverage. The article also offers insights into the company's services and operations.

Given that Wikipedia emphasizes the use of reliable, secondary, and independent sources, I would like to know if this particular review meets the criteria for inclusion. While the review is comprehensive and offers valuable information, it is published on a personal blog, which may raise concerns about reliability and editorial oversight.

Could you please advise on whether this source is appropriate for use in the article? If not, I would appreciate guidance on the types of sources that would be considered acceptable to establish the notability of Square One Insurance Services.

Thank you for your time and assistance. DeadMeat778 (talk) 19:14, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

https://calanbreckon.com/square-one-insurance-review/ here is the link DeadMeat778 (talk) 19:15, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

June 2025

Hello, I'm Neilsvik2006. I noticed that you recently removed content from Patricio Brabomalo without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Neilsvik2006 (talk) 20:19, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jimfbleak - talk to me? 12:47, 7 June 2025 (UTC)