HoodedBeast09

Welcome

Hello, Da'HoodedBeast, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 14:10, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

Getting started

• Introduction
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Intuitive guide to Wikipedia

Finding your way around

• Table of contents
• Directories and indexes
• Department directory

Editing articles

• How to develop an article
• Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help

• Frequently asked questions
• Cheatsheet
• Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
• The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
• Help pages
• Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles

How you can help

• Community Portal
• Join a WikiProject
• Follow Wikipedia etiquette
• Practice civility
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

December 2023

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Novena have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Novena was changed by Da'HoodedBeast (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.865286 on 2023-12-19T15:44:04+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:44, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: St. Andrew Christmas Novena (December 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:St. Andrew Christmas Novena and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 14:10, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Da'HoodedBeast! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 14:10, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: St. Andrew Christmas Novena (December 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Resubmitted without any improvement. A single source, once cited, is nowhere near enough to either establish notability or support the draft contents.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:St. Andrew Christmas Novena and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:02, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: St. Andrew Christmas Novena (December 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Devonian Wombat was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Draft is written in a casual and promotional tone.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:St. Andrew Christmas Novena and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Devonian Wombat (talk) 09:32, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Five Crowns (Card Game) (February 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Five Crowns (Card Game) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 21:00, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Five Crowns (Card Game) (March 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mach61 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Five Crowns (Card Game) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mach61 06:00, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: St. Andrew Christmas Novena (April 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by -noah- was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

You did not change the submission.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:St. Andrew Christmas Novena and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Noah ^💬 01:14, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Palindrome Dates

Hello, HoodedBeast09. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Palindrome Dates, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:06, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Litanies Podcast

Hello HoodedBeast09,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Litanies Podcast for deletion, because it seems to be a test. Did you know that the Wikipedia Sandbox is available for testing out edits?

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 23:39, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

Hello Safari Scribe,

I made a Wikipedia page called Uncovering the Litanies (Podcast). Do you know how long it'll take to get approved or disapproved?

Thanks! HoodedBeast09 (talk) 00:15, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

Blanking pages

Hello @HoodedBeast09, when you create a page in error like you did to Litanies Podcast, do not blank it, rather, tag it with {{db-g7}}. Thanks! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 23:42, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

Hi,

I think I made that by accident, is it possible to delete it? Same with the tag "Uncovering the Litanies," I made that by accident is it possible that that mistake could be deleted?

Thanks HoodedBeast09 (talk) 12:10, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Uncovering the Litanies

A tag has been placed on Category:Uncovering the Litanies indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:30, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! HoodedBeast09, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz Read! Talk! 17:25, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Five Crowns (card game) (July 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Five Crowns (card game) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

asilvering (talk) 06:19, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

Please use an edit summary

Hey HoodedBeast09, Welcome to Wikipedia. I undid a bunch of stuff you did recently because you didn't explain why you made the changes. Edit summaries are how us editors communicate with each other. Without that it's harder to tell if an editor is trying to make the encyclopedia better or just messing around. I hope to see you around doing good work, and I wanted to tell you why I undid some of your work which I couldn't tell was good. Thank you. SchreiberBike | ⌨  00:04, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bright Lights (The Killers song) (August 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bright Lights (The Killers song) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 19:01, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bright Lights (The Killers song) (August 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

See WP:NSONG

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bright Lights (The Killers song) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 21:02, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bright Lights (The Killers song) (August 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CanonNi was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Previous decline still stands. YouTube videos and the band's website do not contribute towards establishing notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bright Lights (The Killers song) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

'''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 10:33, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of saints canonized in 2025 (August 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

Wikipedia is not WP:CRYSTALBALL, we don't know if any of these will be canonised, or when.

Also, the lead states that this is a list of 17 beati, whereas I only count four. Is this still work-in-progress?

Am I missing something?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of saints canonized in 2025 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:38, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi HoodedBeast09. Thank you for your work on St. John Paul the Great (disambiguation). Another editor, Moriwen, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

I'm not sure there's a need for this page, as "St. John Paul the Great" is exclusively used to refer to Pope John Paul II.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Moriwen}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

— Moriwen (talk) 19:50, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

Okay, that's fine.

Thanks for letting me know! HoodedBeast09 (talk) 19:55, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

Could you help me delete it? HoodedBeast09 (talk) 19:56, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

@Moriwen:Okay, that's fine.

Thanks for letting me know! Could you help me delete it? HoodedBeast09 (talk) 19:57, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

For sure! And please feel free to create a redirect from St. John Paul the Great to Pope John Paul II, you're totally right that that's a plausible search term.— Moriwen (talk) 20:08, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of St. John Paul the Great (disambiguation)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on St. John Paul the Great (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
• disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
• is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. — Moriwen (talk) 20:09, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

(That one's an automated message, lol.) — Moriwen (talk) 20:09, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of saints canonized in the 21st century has been accepted

List of saints canonized in the 21st century, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Queen of Hearts (talk) 22:35, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of saints canonized in 2025 (August 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Miminity was:

Same reason as before, blatant violation of WP:CRYSTALBALL

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of saints canonized in 2025 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 11:02, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

August 2024

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Draft:Anne-Gabrielle Caron, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it has been moved to where you can continue to work on it. Please consider using the Article Wizard or the Articles for Creation procedure. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read "Your first article". You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 01:57, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Uncovering the Litanies (Podcast)

Hello HoodedBeast09, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Uncovering the Litanies (Podcast), should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uncovering the Litanies (Podcast).

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|CFA}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

C F A 💬 02:08, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

Hi, is there anyway to undelete my article, Uncovering the Litanies (podcast) so I can edit it?

Thanks!

HoodedBeast09 (talk) 16:44, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

Bright Lights

Hi, you had created a draft article for "Bright Lights". It had been declined twice but you still decided to move it to mainspace yourself despite the concerns presented to you. You then attempted to create two identical versions with non-standard naming conventions which were redirected back to the draft page and removed from mainspace. Please attempt to revise the draft using more reliable sources, and let a reviewer assess the article and perform the move if accepted. Thank you. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 19:55, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

Sounds good! Thank you! HoodedBeast09 (talk) 00:00, 22 August 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Five Crowns (card game)

The article Five Crowns (card game) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG, is reliant on primary sources (i.e. PlayMonster, and Amazon.com) or unreliable sources (i.e. YouTube, Ludiologists.com, and Bar Games 101).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dan arndt (talk) 09:12, 22 August 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of saints canonized in the 20th century has been accepted

List of saints canonized in the 20th century, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 19:45, 30 August 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bright Lights (The Killers song) (September 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by OhHaiMark were:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bright Lights (The Killers song) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

OhHaiMark (talk) 16:15, 12 September 2024 (UTC)

Can I delete my Uncovering the Litanies page?

Hi, my page Uncovering the Litanies was deleted recently. However, when you search, Uncovering the Litanies on Google, it still comes up as a Wikipedia page. But when you click on it, it says that the page doesn't exist. Is it possible to delete that from the search engines? I just want to make Wikipedia fully usable for all and don't want any dead end pages for your website. Thanks! HoodedBeast09 (talk) 17:53, 19 September 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Pints with Aquinas

Hello, HoodedBeast09. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pints with Aquinas, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:07, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

You have recently made edits related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. This is a standard message to inform you that articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 18:07, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

October 2024

Hello, I'm Firefangledfeathers. I noticed that you changed the personal pronouns of an individual in the article Dylan Mulvaney. Wikipedia refers to all people, including transgender and nonbinary people, by the pronouns they have most recently requested for themselves; this applies to all phases of their lives, unless they have requested otherwise. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 18:07, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I'm DanielRigal. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to List of religion and spirituality podcasts have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Do you have a conflict of interests here? I saw that you have uploaded an image of the presenter of the same podcast tagged as your "own work". DanielRigal (talk) 18:34, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: St. Andrew Christmas Novena (October 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tavantius was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Resubmitting without improvement will lead to rejection.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:St. Andrew Christmas Novena and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tavantius (talk) 19:00, 14 October 2024 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! HoodedBeast09, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz Read! Talk! 05:38, 27 October 2024 (UTC)

Hello, HoodedBeast09,

I just wanted to let you know that posting questions on your own User talk page will not result in any responses. What are the chances that another Wikipedia editor has your talk page on their Watchlist? Practically zero. If you have questions about editing on Wikipedia, go to a forum like the Teahouse where editors are available to respond to your queries. I only happened to see your question because I came here about an expiring draft you have but that was purely by coincidence. Try the Teahouse. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:42, 27 October 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Longest NFL Field Goals (November 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at field goal instead.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Subject already covered on the main field goal article. Please issue a split request if you think it needs to be a completely separate article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Longest NFL Field Goals and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 04:47, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Longest NFL Games (November 28)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Remsense was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Consider integrating into an existing article, like Overtime (sports)#Longest games.

Remsense ‥ 论 06:36, 28 November 2024 (UTC)

@Remsense

Hi, it looks like my article was declined. They said it was too much like the Overtime (sports) article but it only has a couple of overtime games in its article. I have all the double overtime games in my article. I believe my article should be accepted because it has more info for a different purpose. Thanks HoodedBeast09 (talk) 13:33, 28 November 2024 (UTC)

It is not substantial enough to be its own article. Like I directly told you above, the amount of information it does have can be added to another article instead. Remsense ‥ 论 13:34, 28 November 2024 (UTC)

@Remsense

Oh, gotcha. Thanks for your time! HoodedBeast09 (talk) 13:35, 28 November 2024 (UTC)

patrick mahomes

yo mr silent guy, any reason why you're adamant in that photo of mahomes? That photo doesn't have him centered at all and it looks like hes about to sneeze. the other photo is completely fine HappyBoi3892 (talk) 00:56, 3 December 2024 (UTC)

@HappyBoi3892

Hey, sorry. I accidentally added that and couldn't find the original picture to change it back.

Thanks for changing it back though! HoodedBeast09 (talk) 04:34, 3 December 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi HoodedBeast09. Thank you for your work on Most accurate kickers in NFL history. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 19:32, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

@North8000

Thank you. I really appreciate your compliment! HoodedBeast09 (talk) 21:08, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Anne-Gabrielle Caron

Hello, HoodedBeast09. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Anne-Gabrielle Caron, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:07, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Bright Lights (The Killers song)

Hello, HoodedBeast09. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bright Lights (The Killers song), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:07, 12 February 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Uncovering the Litanies (podcast) (February 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

The sourcing is no better than when Uncovering the Litanies (podcast) was deleted following AfD.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Uncovering the Litanies (podcast) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:32, 16 February 2025 (UTC)

@DoubleGrazing

Hi, thanks for reviewing my page. Just one question, could you give me examples of things to add to my Wikipedia page to make it acceptable? As for citations, I can't find many. What would you recommend for a podcast citation? I can find where the podcast can be listened to and where the podcast is on IMDb, not what are some other things I can add to get it approved?

Thanks, and have a great rest of your weekend! HoodedBeast09 (talk) 12:47, 16 February 2025 (UTC)

Hi. Like most subjects, per the WP:GNG notability guideline, this would require significant coverage in multiple secondary sources that are reliable and entirely independent of the subject. Your draft only cites primary, user-generated sources which are not considered reliable or independent. (Slight clarification: sources like Spotify or Amazon can be used to support entirely factual, non-contentious information such as episode or track listings, but not much else, and they cannot be used to establish notability which is the issue here.) An earlier version was deleted following the Articles for deletion/Uncovering the Litanies discussion six months ago for exactly the same reason, which means that if an article were to be published without demonstrating clear notability, it would be immediately exposed to G4 speedy deletion anyway. HTH, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:00, 16 February 2025 (UTC)

@DoubleGrazing Thank you. Just curious, if this subject doesn't have other people writing about it, but just has resources like, Spotify, the official website, IMDb, blogs, etc. How can I add more citations? I'm not trying to argue but am just curious. Wouldn't a podcast, if it were available on all those platforms be notable because it clearly exists? Sorry if that came out rude or argumentative, I'm really not trying to be. I'm just asking so I know what to add. Thanks! HoodedBeast09 (talk) 13:06, 16 February 2025 (UTC)

Feel absolutely free to ask, it's not at all rude or argumentative! I'd rather you did, than not.

Reductio ad absurdum, if we catalogued things that merely exist, we would have c. 8bn articles on living persons alone, and countless more besides on dead persons, other living beings, geographical features, businesses, products, artistic creations, ideas, etc. Clearly that isn't possible, hence we must narrow the scope, and the main way we do that is by only covering subjects which have been previously covered by multiple independent and reliable sources; we then merely summarise what they have said. From this it follows that if no such sources exist, then their coverage cannot be summarised, and a Wikipedia article cannot be created. (There are some subjects that are deemed inherently notable, such as species, some geographical features, etc., but they are very much the exception.)

I meant earlier to point you to the special notability guideline for web content, WP:WEB. It is essentially a derivative of the general GNG one, but may contain some provisions which could be useful here. Please have a look, it explains the whole concept of notability much better than I ever could.

Best, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:34, 16 February 2025 (UTC)

@DoubleGrazing Thank you for the info, that makes sense. What should I do with my draft. Should I delete it? HoodedBeast09 (talk) 14:18, 16 February 2025 (UTC)

You cannot delete it yourself, you need to be an admin to do that. I can do it for you, if you want? Or you can just leave it there, and it will be deleted automatically six months after the last human (ie. non-bot) edit. Which also means that if you make even a minor edit every six months, you could potentially keep it in the draft space for quite long, in the hope that better sources appear. Up to you. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:23, 16 February 2025 (UTC)

@DoubleGrazing Okay, I'll keep it up for now. Thanks for all your time and help! HoodedBeast09 (talk) 14:29, 16 February 2025 (UTC)

Also, if there were sources that came out for this subject, what types of things should I be looking out for? i.e., like what pages on Google would start writing about this subject? Thanks HoodedBeast09 (talk) 14:34, 16 February 2025 (UTC)

Like I'm assuming Facebook and IMDb wouldn't be good sources, but do you know what I'm asking? HoodedBeast09 (talk) 14:36, 16 February 2025 (UTC)

Can I add blogs or posts from Facebook, Instagram, X, etc? HoodedBeast09 (talk) 14:53, 16 February 2025 (UTC)

No, Facebook (and other social media) and IMDb are also user-generated, so not considered reliable, and also not independent.

To be reliable, sources need to employ editorial oversight (ie. someone writes the content, but an editor with legal and professional responsibility for its publication approves it), and have a reputation for fact-checking and error-correction. You can read more on this at WP:RS / WP:RSP.

The sources also need to be independent of the subject. The obvious implication is that the sources shouldn't be related to or associated with the subject in any way. But it also means that the content should not originate with the subject: eg. press releases, sponsored content, etc. may appear in a publication that on the face of it seems independent, but the actual content isn't. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:56, 16 February 2025 (UTC)

@DoubleGrazing

Okay, so is everybodywiki.com a user-generated source and shouldn't be used? HoodedBeast09 (talk) 15:14, 16 February 2025 (UTC)

I don't know, I'm not familiar with it, but almost certainly user-generated judging by the 'wiki' in the name. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:28, 16 February 2025 (UTC)

@DoubleGrazing

Would the official website be good to add? HoodedBeast09 (talk) 17:28, 16 February 2025 (UTC)

Sure, you can add a link to their website, either in the infobox and/or in the 'External links' section. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:37, 16 February 2025 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:UTL video episode.png

Thanks for uploading File:UTL video episode.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:30, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

Draft:Luke Evans (podcaster) and Draft:Uncovering the Litanies (podcast)

Hello, HoodedBeast09. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template), including links or details of reliable sources that support your suggestions;
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:58, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

Hi HoodedBeast. I've added the above notification template just for reference because it contains links to pages I think apply to your situation. For reference, Wikipedia doesn't expressly prohibit what it refers to as "conflict-of-interest" editing, but it does highy discourage because it can sometimes lead to serious problems. Wikipedia does, however, prohibit undisclosed paid-editing per Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure so please make sure you're careful with that if you've got a vested financial interest or are otherwise being compensated about the two drafts you're working on related to "Luke Evans" and "Uncovering the Littanies". DoubleGrazing seems to be helping regarding things like Wikipedia:Notability; so, I'm only adding this for your additional reference since it seems like you might be trying to create a Wikipedia article about yourself or someone you're personally/professionally connected to or a podcast you're associated with. It's fine for you to continue working on these drafts if you want, but you should try to follow the guidance given on the pages linked to above as much as possible. If, by chance, you're indeed trying to create Wikipedia content about yourself or perhaps someone you're closely connected to, you might also want to take a look at Wikipedia:Autobiography, Wikipedia:An article about yourself isn't necessarily a good thing, Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not, Wikipedia:Ownership of content and Wikipedia:Wikipedia is in the real world because you might find the information on those pages helpful. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:11, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

Your file uploads

Hi HoodedBeast09. You've uploaded quite a number of files to both Wikipedia and Commons that ended up having to be deleted because of questionable copyright licensing or claims of own work. How to upload and use images on Wikipedia can be a tricky thing to get the hang of and it's easy to make mistakes. One or two mistakes is OK and somewhat expected, but repeating the same mistakes over and over again could eventually lead to either a Wikipedia administrator or a Commons administrator deciding to step in and take some action against your accounts. So, before uploading any more files to either, you probably should take a close look at Wikipedia:Image use policy and c:Commons:Licensing. If you have any questions about either page, you can ask them respectively at Wikipedia:Help desk, Wikipedia:Teahouse or Wikipedia:Media copyright questions for files uploaded to Wikipedia, or at c:Commons:Help desk or c:Commons:Village pump/Copyright for files uploaded to Commons. One of the worst things you can do after one of your file uploads has been deleted is to simply to re-upload it again without addressing the reasons why it was deleted; not only is this unnecessary (deleted files aren't gone forever but can be restored once the reasons why they've been deleted are sorted out), but it also could give am administrator the impression that you might not have the competence needed to be uploading files. So, it's better to ask questions when you're not sure instead of just uploading a file and hoping it will sort itself out. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:35, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Uncovering the Litanies (podcast) (February 17)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by TipsyElephant was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: The sources do not demonstrate notability and the article was previously deleted because of this. TipsyElephant (talk) 11:05, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

TipsyElephant (talk) 11:05, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Anne-Gabrielle Caron

Hello, HoodedBeast09. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Anne-Gabrielle Caron".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 02:23, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Bright Lights (The Killers song)

Hello, HoodedBeast09. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Bright Lights".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 16:24, 12 March 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:St. Andrew Christmas Novena

Hello, HoodedBeast09. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:St. Andrew Christmas Novena, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:09, 16 March 2025 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Luke Evans (podcaster)

Hello, HoodedBeast09. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Luke Evans".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions here. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 20:24, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:St. Andrew Christmas Novena

Hello, HoodedBeast09. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "St. Andrew Christmas Novena".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions here. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 19:27, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Matt Fradd

The article Matt Fradd has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I don't see notability established here. Sources cited include a couple of mentions in a list of speakers, biographies on websites associated with Mr Fradd, and a link to TVTropes.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Moriwen (talk) 17:11, 28 April 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Longest NFL Field Goals

Hello, HoodedBeast09. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Longest NFL Field Goals, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:08, 29 April 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Longest NFL Games

Hello, HoodedBeast09. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Longest NFL Games, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:09, 30 April 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wikipedia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Articles. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 14 May 2025 (UTC)

Backlot Stunt Coaster

Your recent edit at Backlot Stunt Coaster added unsourced information. If you obtained this from a reliable source, please cite the source if you decide to re-add the information. Also, the information would be better discussed/presented in the History section of the ride instead of the Layout section. In the layout, the only thing that needs to be stated would be that the fire was disabled. Right now, it might only be temporarily disabled. Until we know more, it might be best to wait for information to be released by the park. --GoneIn60 (talk) 15:01, 15 May 2025 (UTC)

Nomination of NFL kickers who have scored touchdowns for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article NFL kickers who have scored touchdowns is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NFL kickers who have scored touchdowns until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

« Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 22:45, 16 May 2025 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Longest NFL Field Goals

Hello, HoodedBeast09. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Longest NFL Field Goals".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:46, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Longest NFL Games

Hello, HoodedBeast09. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Longest NFL Games".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:35, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:List of saints canonized in 2025

Hello, HoodedBeast09. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of saints canonized in 2025, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:09, 8 June 2025 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:List of saints canonized in 2025

Hello, HoodedBeast09. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "List of saints canonized in 2025".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions here. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 16:27, 6 July 2025 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Daily Wire hosts

Template:Daily Wire hosts has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 15:37, 8 July 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Uncovering the Litanies (podcast)

Hello, HoodedBeast09. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Uncovering the Litanies (podcast), a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:06, 7 August 2025 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Anne-Gabrielle Caron

Hello, HoodedBeast09. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Anne-Gabrielle Caron".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:27, 21 August 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Donald Trump, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages German and Scottish.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

September 2025

Hello, I'm TNstingray. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Age and health concerns about Donald Trump, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. TNstingray (talk) 23:56, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

@TNstingray Alright, thanks for the kind heads up! HoodedBeast09 (talk) 11:07, 3 September 2025 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Uncovering the Litanies (podcast)

Hello, HoodedBeast09. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Uncovering the Litanies".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 16:24, 7 September 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cracker Barrel logo controversy (September 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pythoncoder was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cracker Barrel logo controversy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 07:22, 12 September 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cracker Barrel logo controversy (September 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Carolina2k22 was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cracker Barrel logo controversy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Carolina2k22 • (talk) 15:06, 12 September 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Mason Maggs

Hello, HoodedBeast09. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mason Maggs, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:08, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Cracker Barrel logo controversy

Hello, HoodedBeast09. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cracker Barrel logo controversy, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:08, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Mason Maggs

Hello, HoodedBeast09. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Mason Maggs".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:37, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Cracker Barrel logo controversy

Hello, HoodedBeast09. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Cracker Barrel logo controversy".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 15:26, 12 March 2026 (UTC)