Constantin Petcu

?

|Test Answer of Answers (talk) 15:21, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

October 2023

Hello, I'm Valenciano. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to FCSB seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Valenciano (talk) 20:22, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

April 2024

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to FCSB. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. tgeorgescu (talk) 07:48, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

I did not added my point of view, I corrected a mistake. FCSB was founded in 2003, not in 1947. Don't erase that anymore. Constantin Petcu (talk) 07:56, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

That’s wrong. The history of the old Steaua Bucharest belongs to FCSB and not CSA Steaua. They were founded in June 1947 as a result. 188.31.187.129 (talk) 05:29, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at FCSB, you may be blocked from editing. tgeorgescu (talk) 08:12, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at FCSB. tgeorgescu (talk) 08:15, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at FCSB shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. tgeorgescu (talk) 08:15, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

Stop publishing fake information. It's not a neutral point of view what appears on the page I'm editing! Constantin Petcu (talk) 08:17, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Constantin_Petcu reported by User:Tgeorgescu (Result: ). Thank you. tgeorgescu (talk) 10:41, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

April 2024

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring, as you did at FCSB. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bishonen | tålk 13:13, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

You blocked me because I corrected some fake information on FCSB's page. Constantin Petcu (talk) 13:19, 4 April 2024 (UTC)