Civilian Officer
November 2025
edit
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Talk:Kentucky Colonel, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. LakesideMinersCome Talk To Me! 16:16, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
December 2025
edit
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Kentucky Colonel, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Aspects of the content you are adding is nonsensical and therefore you are disrupting the normal editing of the article. Stefen 𝕋ower Huddle • Handiwerk 22:57, 15 December 2025 (UTC)
- I actually believe your edits are the most troubling. You replaced a meat puppet whose photo has reappeared on the Kentucky Colonel article, and you reverted a claim to W.O. Bradley making the first commission before he became the state's governor. Kentucky deserves better. Civilian Officer (talk) 23:34, 15 December 2025 (UTC)
- Clean up your overall sloppy work and stop injecting nonsense like "1833s" and "Kentucy" and maybe the content will stand. Stefen 𝕋ower Huddle • Handiwerk 23:36, 15 December 2025 (UTC)
- Again here, not me! Those things were in the article before I made any edits. Stick with the supportable facts. Support your misgivings. Civilian Officer (talk) 00:13, 16 December 2025 (UTC)
- If it's "not you", then why are you restoring this material? Stefen 𝕋ower Huddle • Handiwerk 00:21, 16 December 2025 (UTC)
- I restored the material I edited in. You made three edits to my material. Figure it out, review the record, that is the third time you have demonstrated you are confused, and still have not addressed a propensity towards supporting a fabricated narrative with no historical foundation. Civilian Officer (talk) 01:31, 16 December 2025 (UTC)
- I see the edits you made, and I see you adding back content with nonsense/flawed aspects. My eyes don't lie, and the edit history doesn't lie. I am not discussing parts of the material you may have done correctly. I am discussing the nonsense/flawed parts of which I gave two examples. If you want to add back material, you need to check it far more carefully in the process.
- The best bet is to break it down into smaller separate edits, giving it your highest scrutiny with each one. Simply reverting my revert will not suffice. Wikipedians are expected to be responsible for their edits, and that applies to everyone. Stefen 𝕋ower Huddle • Handiwerk 04:08, 16 December 2025 (UTC)
- I restored the material I edited in. You made three edits to my material. Figure it out, review the record, that is the third time you have demonstrated you are confused, and still have not addressed a propensity towards supporting a fabricated narrative with no historical foundation. Civilian Officer (talk) 01:31, 16 December 2025 (UTC)
- If it's "not you", then why are you restoring this material? Stefen 𝕋ower Huddle • Handiwerk 00:21, 16 December 2025 (UTC)
- Again here, not me! Those things were in the article before I made any edits. Stick with the supportable facts. Support your misgivings. Civilian Officer (talk) 00:13, 16 December 2025 (UTC)
- Clean up your overall sloppy work and stop injecting nonsense like "1833s" and "Kentucy" and maybe the content will stand. Stefen 𝕋ower Huddle • Handiwerk 23:36, 15 December 2025 (UTC)
Hi David!
editYou could save me and the admins some time by immediately refraining from making any further edits. Barry Wom (talk) 03:04, 20 December 2025 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Choa Kok Sui
edit
Hello, Civilian Officer. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Choa Kok Sui, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:08, 2 March 2026 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Choa Kok Sui
edit
Hello, Civilian Officer. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Choa Kok Sui".
Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 21:25, 30 March 2026 (UTC)