Disruptive editing

edit

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Canterbury Tail talk 19:37, 23 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

If you make an edit and are reverted, you discuss on the talk page and get consensus as per WP:BRD. You do not edit war for your preferred version, you discuss. Additionally please read what actually is WP:VANDALISM before you accuse others of it. The WP:BURDEN is on the person wishing to make the edit to obtain the consensus. Canterbury Tail talk 19:37, 23 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Unsourced

edit

Information icon Hello, I'm Canterbury Tail. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Canterbury Tail talk 02:57, 24 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

I stand with you

edit

I salute you for not backing down. I want to make a alliance with you. I am proud of you. Zaptain United (talk) 00:33, 28 January 2026 (UTC)Reply