September 2025

edit

Information icon Hello, I'm QuicoleJR. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. QuicoleJR (talk) 18:50, 22 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Also, please do not mark edits as minor if they add new information, as this could be considered disruptive. Thanks, QuicoleJR (talk) 18:51, 22 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Information icon Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article. Thank you. QuicoleJR (talk) 19:16, 22 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (September 22)

edit
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by QuicoleJR was:
This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read "What Wikipedia is not" for more information.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This is a user page, not an article. If you want it to be moved to be your user page, just say so. If you were submitting this as an article, don't.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
QuicoleJR (talk) 19:21, 22 September 2025 (UTC)Reply
Teahouse logo
Hello, Celine205! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! QuicoleJR (talk) 19:21, 22 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (September 22)

edit
Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Cyberdog958 was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.
cyberdog958Talk 22:17, 22 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dennis Consorte (September 23)

edit
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by GGOTCC were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Please cite everything in the article
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
GGOTCC 02:59, 23 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of User:Celine205/sandbox

edit

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. The page User:Celine205/sandbox has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:39, 23 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

October 2025

edit
Information icon

Hello Celine205. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Celine205. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Celine205|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Fram (talk) 13:03, 17 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Blocked as a sockpuppet

edit
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:DancingFountain per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/DancingFountain. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Sohom (talk) 17:06, 21 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Dennis Consorte

edit

Information icon Hello, Celine205. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dennis Consorte, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:09, 30 May 2026 (UTC)Reply