Getting rid of red.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Talley Vineyards (December 6)

edit
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gene93k was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
The SFGate coverage is good, but the other references are not enough to satisfy the WP:CORP guideline (especially WP:CORPDEPTH). It needs another independent source with non-trivial coverage with a national audience, or at least an audience outside California Wine Country. The NYT and AP citations are trivial mentions. The SLO Wine Country and KCBX citations cannot be considered independent.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
• Gene93k (talk) 18:43, 6 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
Hello, Bryandamon. You have new messages at Gene93k's talk page.
Message added 01:03, 7 December 2018 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply
Hello, Bryandamon. You have new messages at Gene93k's talk page.
Message added 20:09, 11 December 2018 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Talley Vineyards (December 11)

edit
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Still doesn't meet WP:ORGCRIT Coverage of business is run-of-the-mill. WP:MILL Being listed in wine guides is still connected to the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusWOOF (barksniff) 22:33, 11 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Talley Vineyards has been accepted

edit
Talley Vineyards, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 11:05, 15 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:Talley Vineyards brick wine logo.png

edit

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:01, 20 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Talley Vineyards brick wine logo.png

edit
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Talley Vineyards brick wine logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:23, 5 April 2025 (UTC)Reply