Ash.tahno

Welcome!

Hi Ash.tahno! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, try the "Suggested edits" module top left on your homepage, or you can always find a task here:

Search the Task Center

Happy editing! All the Best -- Chuck ^Talk 23:25, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of acquisitions by Samsung (January 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Memer15151 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Wikipedia:Notability states that a standalone list is usually "considered notable is if it has been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources" and that notability "is based on the group". All of the independent sources listed discuss individual acquisitions, but not the group of acquired subsidiaries itself. If enough sources that contribute to notability exist that document the topic of Samsung subsidiaries in general, then this article can be reconsidered. I should also point out that the Samsung article already includes a section related to this exact topic.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of acquisitions by Samsung and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

UserMemer (chat) Tribs 19:39, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Ash.tahno! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! UserMemer (chat) Tribs 19:39, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hello Ash.tahno! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Source charged for fraud, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:03, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Galaxy Home.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Galaxy Home.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:25, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

February 2026

Hi Ash.tahno! I noticed that you recently made an edit at Stellantis and marked it as "minor", but it may not have been. On Wikipedia, "minor edit" refers only to superficial edits that could never be disputed, such as fixing typos or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not minor, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. Onorem (talk) 23:05, 11 February 2026 (UTC)

@Onorem I will take note of this in the future Ash.tahno (talk) 23:10, 11 February 2026 (UTC)

Apex Legends characters

Hey, I noticed that you seem interested in Apex Legends as a topic. Would you be willing to look over the articles Loba and Catalyst to tell me if there's anything glaring I've either overlooked or got wrong? Cukie Gherkin (talk) 21:40, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for reaching out. There was actually quite a lot more background detail than I expected. I would say, though, that only referring to the characters' abilities vaguely is a miss in a game that revolves largely around using said abilities. I added descriptions and names of those in. Ash.tahno (talk) 00:44, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for the input. On Catalyst, I made changes to ensure that it reads more encyclopedic. Since you're new, a helpful guide to refer to is WP:NOTAGUIDE. Also, when citing gameplay mechanics like abilities, you should make sure to cite reliable secondary sources rather than primary sources (like the Apex Legends site) to verify the info. The way it was written as a list, it feels like something there to provide assistance for a fan of Catalyst, but the content should be written with an uninformed reader in mind. Could you try rewriting Loba's abilities to match how Catalyst's are written in the latest edit? - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 07:09, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for the reference material. I reformatted the abilities and added a secondary source. However, I do not understand what you mean by "to provide assistance for a fan of Catalyst" or informed readers. These abilities are very basic "main actions" in Apex, as every character has some form of them. One does not need to be a fan to any degree to make use of the information. I was not diving into any detailed cross-interaction effects with other abilities, distances/timings/durability, or their strengths/weaknesses, etc. Also, the categorization of abilities is not particularly unique to this game either. Uninformed readers can still grasp that there are differently named types of abilities without the need to understand the tendencies of each category. Ash.tahno (talk) 15:28, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

The main thing is one of three things::

1. The information is of the utmost importance to understanding a character (were it not for the fact that Apex has a competitive scene, I'd say that Catalyst and Loba are adequately covered by explaining the general theme of their gameplay, Catalyst being a defensive character who utilizes ferrofluid and Loba being a character who specializes in detecting rare treasure. By comparison, a Final Fantasy character article shouldn't mention the various spells they can use in general because what's important is the detail that they can use spells, not what those spells are)
2. The character's abilities are important to understanding the plot (for example, Sephiroth (Final Fantasy) mentions Meteor because it is plot relevant)
3. There is reception specifically about a character's abilities - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 21:20, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

1. If you are going by such a standard, I am confused at how detailing what an Apex season is in the character article (when the Apex Legends article exists) is of "utmost importance" in comparison, especially when there is no source to support this action.
2. Although my knowledge on FF is limited, I do not think Final Fantasy is a comparable example in terms of the significance of understanding plot.
3. I added secondary sources reacting to the abilities. Hope they satisfy this condition.
4. I was just responding to your criticisms because they did not make sense to me but you diverted the conversation. If you are speculating on the lack of need in an alternate reality without the competitive scene, I am not sure why you need to argue against this in reality. I am not interested in continuing this conversation, as it is clearly unproductive.

Ash.tahno (talk) 01:37, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

I'm giving you advice, not criticism, and trying to explain how Wikipedia tends to work. If your goal is productivity, viewing people as antagonists for trying to explain something to you isn't going to make editing Wikipedia a pleasant experience. Cukie Gherkin (talk) 02:46, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

I don't really care if you call it advice or criticism. I am open to both, and have clearly tried to incorporate whichever of the two it was. I do not think criticism has to be antagonizing.

But you have insisted on ignoring my points when I took the time to engage with what you brought up individually. Your approach is structurally condescending. Blaming the receiving end of a monologue for feeling antagonized when they did not suggest such a thing is an incredible level of projection. This has, frankly, been the most unpleasant experience I have had on Wikipedia so far, and I will not let you gaslight me into thinking it is my fault. You are not being antagonizing for trying to explain something to me, but because of your attitude. Ash.tahno (talk) 21:52, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

Goodness Cukie Gherkin (talk) 17:49, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

Again, you only prove my point. This is a waste of time. Please do not come back to my talk page. Ash.tahno (talk) 21:28, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Automotive industry in France

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Automotive industry in France, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A generic title error. References show this error when they have a generic placeholder title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 22:42, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Apple Inc. suppliers for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Apple Inc. suppliers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Apple Inc. suppliers until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

MediaKyle (talk) 17:10, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

MOS:BOLDLINK

Hello, just noting this guideline grapesurgeon (talk) 06:52, 13 April 2026 (UTC)

Oh, my bad. Thank you! Ash.tahno (talk) 13:11, 13 April 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Apple Inc. suppliers, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bloomberg was added. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 18:00, 20 April 2026 (UTC)