ArickGrootveld

CS1 error on Error exponents in hypothesis testing

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Error exponents in hypothesis testing, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A dates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style's guidance on dates. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:28, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Universal hypothesis testing has been accepted

Universal hypothesis testing, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

• See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.

Future articles

• Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

• Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

• Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
• Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
• You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
• Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
• The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
• For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

VidanaliK (talk to me) (contributions) 14:08, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Method of Types (April 27)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Ldm1954, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the neologism meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

• provide significant coverage: discuss the term in detail, not just brief mentions or routine use;
• are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
• are independent: not connected to the subject, such as promoted or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Wikipedia is not a dictionary and we do not accept articles that are simply definitions of neologisms.

This page can probably be OK, but needs some improvement. This draft really only uses papers from Csiszar, and a non-obvious link to (probably) §13.3.3 of a book. Please:

1. Look at WP:MOS for format details, e.g. bold of the title. 2. Add a little broader context for the general reader. 3. Use broader sources to better establish notability.

4.Provide more encyclopedic information such as uses, currently this is an extended definition.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Method of Types to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

Ldm1954 (talk) 12:24, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

Hello, ArickGrootveld! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ldm1954 (talk) 12:24, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of Ludovico Lami for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ludovico Lami is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ludovico Lami until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

Ldm1954 (talk) 17:24, 20 May 2026 (UTC)