Aquafishy7

June 2025

Hello, I'm WhiteTailedEagle. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, 2025 Atlantic hurricane season, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 🦅White-tailed eagle^{Talk to the eagle}Stalking eagle 16:12, 29 June 2025 (UTC)

Thank you, WhiteTailedEagle! The sources are provided afterwards :) Aquafishy7 (talk) 15:04, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Skulliness (July 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Skulliness and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

qcne (talk) 12:39, 8 July 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Aquafishy7! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! qcne (talk) 12:39, 8 July 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Skulliness

Hello, Aquafishy7. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Skulliness, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:07, 11 December 2025 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Skulliness

Hello, Aquafishy7. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Skulliness".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 13:25, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Gorelovo Municipal Okrug moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Gorelovo Municipal Okrug. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it has no sources. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Rambley^[who?] 00:22, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

List of cities in Kherson Oblast

Hello. I've reverted your edits at this article and want to explain my reasoning. Regarding (Claimed and partially controlled by Russia) in the first paragraph, it's just redundant considering that this is already covered in the second paragraph. As for the rest, first of all, your additions are unsourced. Per WP:V, the text needs to be confirmed by reliable sources that need to be cited. Second, this is a featured list, which has been reviewed by multiple users and follows a general structure of a number of lists of cities in Ukraine that have also achieved this status. In disputed situations, it is necessary to reach a consensus, and in this particular case, a number of people have approved the (more or less) current version of the list, so major changes certainly require discussion. There have been many discussions regarding the broader situation but I am not personally aware of all the relevant ones. Finally, these edits fall under the topic of the Russo-Ukrainian war, which is under general sanctions, requiring users to be extended confirmed before making edits. I hope this clears up the situation and feel free to ask me any questions. Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 19:07, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

Administration of Kherson Oblast by Russia

Hello, I have made some changes at Administration of Kherson Oblast by Russia, but the article still needs attention. In particular, please shift your punctuation to go in front of citations, not after, as it appears throughout the article. Thank you, Jessicapierce (talk) 15:40, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

Thank you! I'm new to editing Wikipedia, so I didn't know how to do references properly, and have made several grammar mistakes in the article. In particular, I want to add more information about how Russia manages the region, because right now it's fairly similar to Russian occupation of Kherson Oblast, an article about the MILITARY OCCUPATION of the oblast and not how Russia controls it as a subject of the Russian Federation. Aquafishy7 (talk) 09:48, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

No worries, and thanks for making those changes! Let me know if I can help with anything. Jessicapierce (talk) 15:49, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Contentious topics notice: Russo-Ukrainian War

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in the Russo-Ukrainian War. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. Additionally, the following restriction(s) apply to this topic area: Only extended-confirmed editors may make edits related to the topic area, though editors who are not extended-confirmed may post constructive comments and make edit requests related to articles within the topic area on article talk pages. Should disruption occur on article talk pages, administrators may take enforcement actions against disruptive editors and/or apply page protection on article talk pages. However, non-extended-confirmed editors may not make edits to internal project discussions related to the topic area, even on article talk pages. Internal project discussions include, but are not limited to, Articles for deletion nominations, WikiProjects, requests for comment, requested moves, and noticeboard discussions. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

_signed, Rosguill ^talk 15:34, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

The editor is clearly making edits about the area despite not being extended confirmed, for example they have created Administration of Kherson Oblast by Russia. TylerBurden (talk) 17:34, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

Agreed. Administrators? ~2026-20513-58 (talk) 02:35, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

Actually that one wasn't mean't to be a Russo-Ukrainian war article, the opposite actually, it was meant to talk about the administration of Kherson Oblast without it sounding like it's talking about the OCCUPATION of the oblast MILITARILY, but how it manages to control the CIVILIANS in it, therefore hardly touching the topic of the war rather than Russian subjects and administration. Aquafishy7 (talk) 03:32, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

How does that make any logical sense whatsoever? How is a Russian military occupation not related to the war? TylerBurden (talk) 21:15, 9 June 2026 (UTC)

It's a subject of the Russian Federation, means it should be covered as such, and not only as a military occupation. This is an article about the SUBJECT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION, NOT about the military occupation of it. Creating "Administration of Kharkiv Oblast by Russia" would be more sensitive. The war is only described as a background for annexation. Aquafishy7 (talk) 12:25, 13 June 2026 (UTC)