Apachescholar
Joined 20 September 2025
Latest comment: 8 months ago by Perryprog in topic Your submission at Articles for creation: Gila Apache has been accepted
| This is Apachescholar's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (September 21)
edit
Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:
The comment the reviewer left was:
- Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
- Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
- Essay-like writing
- Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
- Close paraphrasing
Obvious AI output.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Apachescholar/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
 |
Hello, Apachescholar!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ktkvtsh (talk) 01:58, 21 September 2025 (UTC) |
Welcome!
edit
Getting StartedTutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.
The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.
The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.
Tips- Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
- It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
- If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue on the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
- Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
- When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
- If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
- Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.
Happy editing! Cheers, Ktkvtsh (talk) 01:58, 21 September 2025 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (September 21)
editThis submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
The comment the reviewer left was:
What are these sources you're citing? You need to list them somewhere, with full bibliographic detail so that they can be reliably identified for verification.
The preferred method of referencing is explained at WP:REFB.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Apachescholar/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Gila Apache (September 21)
editThis submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
The comment the reviewer left was:
I've gone through and done what I can to convert most citations to Wikipedia's styling of citations (see here for more details). However, in doing so I've noticed that many—especially the early sources—didn't seem to support the facts they were listed after. I've marked those with "failed verification". (In some cases this may be due to incorrect page numbers.) I've also had a few citations I was unable to properly find, so I would appreciate if you could do so using the previously mentioned link as a guide. These are the citations I marked with "full citation needed". One case was an irrelevant citation that just didn't seem to relate to the paragraph. I also tagged one citations as "verification needed", but really I think that whole paragraph was a bit confusing, and I want to say that Fort Sill and Fort Marion got switched up but I could be wrong. There's another I tagged as verification needed later on that I just couldn't really find online? ("Warm Spring Apache Subsistence")
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
To get this draft accepted, all that really needs to be done is to fix the issues in brackets in the first few paragraphs. I will note that I did not check that the citations supported facts when they were reused later on, so I would appreciate it if you checked the accuracy of those as well. If you have any questions (or responses to this somewhat rambly comment), I'd suggest leaving them on this article's talk page, which I'll keep an eye on.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gila Apache and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Gila Apache has been accepted
edit
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Perryprog (talk) 19:55, 22 September 2025 (UTC)