Anonymous787939

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pendulum (upcoming film) (April 20)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, RangersRus, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the film meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for films. The draft requires either:

• evidence that the subject meets any of the specific criteria for films;

or multiple published secondary sources that:

• provide significant coverage: discuss the film in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
• are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
• are independent: not connected to the film, such as press releases, the studio's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Pendulum (upcoming film) to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

RangersRus (talk) 18:34, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

April 2026

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Bill Fagerbakke, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Fathoms Below (talk) 19:47, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

Ah, it seems as thought you were attempting to add an hlist. You can disregard the above warning, you can fix the hlist by adding two curly brackets "}}" at the end, which I just did for you on that page. Apologies for the mistake on my part. Fathoms Below (talk) 19:57, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

May 2026

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Forrest Gump, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. HypnoBlader (talk) 22:32, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nintendo 64. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. HypnoBlader (talk) 01:53, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Li Jun Li, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article. Thank you. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 22:16, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Christine Ko, you may be blocked from editing. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 23:55, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia. HypnoBlader (talk) 02:38, 19 May 2026 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Anonymous.939787 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Anonymous.939787. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request through the unblock wizard or through your talk page.  — Newslinger talk 12:45, 21 May 2026 (UTC)