Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 5

Welcome!

Hello, Andysmith248, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Qaei 18:22, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

January 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to List of nicknames of Prime Ministers of the United Kingdom has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:00, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Andysmith248. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Andysmith248. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Justin Webb, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bath (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ  Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ben Shephard (disambiguation) has been accepted

Ben Shephard (disambiguation), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Disambig-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Whispering(t) 16:21, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mel Giedroyc, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oxford High School (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

Huw Edwards

Hi. Was the recent move discussed anywhere beforehand? Deb (talk) 14:53, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

It was not. Andysmith248 (talk) 21:17, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
Don't you think it might have been slightly controversial? Deb (talk) 22:19, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

Hello. I see that you have moved Huw Edwards to Huw Edwards (disambiguation). Are you suggesting that the journalist is a primary topic and intending to move Huw Edwards (journalist) to Huw Edwards? If not then we should probably revert the move to avoid leaving a malplaced disambiguation page. What do you think? Certes (talk) 22:15, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

Hello. Yes, I do think the journalist should be the primary topic and Huw Edwards (journalist) should be moved to Huw Edwards. Andysmith248 (talk) 09:24, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for the reply. The journalist certainly first comes to my mind but I would suggest starting a RM as it may be considered controversial. Certes (talk) 15:11, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
I have now requested that Huw Edwards (journalist) be moved to Huw Edwards on the Huw Edwards (journalist) talk page. Thanks for your suggestion. Andysmith248 (talk) 18:23, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
In the meantime I have changed the disambiguation page back to its original state. Andysmith248 (talk) 18:23, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Amol Rajan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Channel 5
David Shukman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to St. Pancras

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from https://www.theguardian.com/media/2012/jan/16/bbc-david-shukman-science-editor. Copying text directly from a source is a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, mozst of the content had to be removed. Content you add to Wikipedia should be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:44, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chris Tarrant: Extreme Railways (February 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.
Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tonethis includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.
You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. SITH (talk) 16:03, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Andysmith248! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SITH (talk) 16:03, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Elliot Graham, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Claremont High School (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ  Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chris Evans (journalist) has been accepted

Chris Evans (journalist), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

~Kvng (talk) 23:15, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Moulder-Brown, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Stepmother (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Simon Konecki (March 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Praxidicae were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Being the spouse of someone does not equate to notability. We need coverage of him (in-depth) unrelated to his marriage.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Praxidicae (talk) 17:27, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: My Life, Our Times has been accepted

My Life, Our Times, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 18:33, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Bryant (journalist) has been accepted

John Bryant (journalist), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Stevey7788 (talk) 20:41, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chris Tarrant: Extreme Railways (April 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Needs a few more news sources from WP:RSP (avoiding The Sun and other tabloids) to indicate reception, also history of the broadcast and home media. Series appears notable enough otherwise.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusWOOF (barksniff) 13:50, 4 April 2019 (UTC)