Andyashua

Your submission at Articles for creation: Martins Vincent Otse Initiative (February 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pythoncoder was:

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Wikipedia guidelines prohibit the use of LLMs to write articles from scratch. In addition, LLM-generated articles usually have multiple quality issues, to include:

• Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
• Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
• Essay-like writing
• Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
• Close paraphrasing
  

Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Martins Vincent Otse Initiative and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 14:03, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Andyashua! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 14:03, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Martins Vincent Otse Initiative (February 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Ultimately fails our criteria for WP:NCORP; most of these sources are WP:DOGBITESMAN.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Martins Vincent Otse Initiative and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 14:02, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Martins Vincent Otse Initiative (February 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Do not resubmit if you're not willing to make improvements; there's none to be made since this doesn't even meet the WP:NCORP guideline.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Martins Vincent Otse Initiative and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 10:01, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Andyashua (talk) 19:37, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

Hi Vanderwaalforces,

Thank you for your previous feedback regarding WP:NCORP and 'routine coverage.' I have significantly overhauled this draft to move beyond the 'dog bites man' news cycle of the founder's social media activities.

I have specifically addressed the notability concerns by:

Pivoting the focus: The article now centers on the MVOI’s 'open-ledger' philanthropic model, which is a departure from standard NGO operations in Nigeria.

Adding Analytical Sources: I included secondary analysis from Vanguard regarding the NGO's impact on national data privacy debates (the NDPC guidelines). This moves the coverage from 'routine' to 'significant/analytical,' as the organization's methodology is now a subject of expert critique.

Refining Tone: I have stripped the draft of promotional language and celebrity-focused 'fluff' to meet WP:NPOV standards.

I believe this version now demonstrates the organization's independent notability within the Nigerian non-profit landscape. I would appreciate a fresh look."

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

It appears you may have used a large language model (LLM), such as ChatGPT, in your edits. While LLMs are powerful, machine-generated text often contains serious flaws. They may introduce bias, errors, plagiarism, libel, or even hoaxes. Specifically asking an LLM to "write a Wikipedia article" can sometimes cause the output to be outright fabrication, complete with fictitious references. Editors must verify all LLM-generated text before using it in an article. Completely LLM-generated articles may be quickly deleted. If you are unsure about your wording, an alternative is to suggest it on the talk page for another volunteer to look at it. If you are creating a new article, you may use the Articles for Creation process to get feedback on your work.

As you get started editing Wikipedia, you may find the pages below to be helpful:

• Introduction
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

If you still have questions, there is the Teahouse, or you can , and someone will be along to answer it shortly. In your messages, please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and a timestamp. Happy editing! Sarsenet•he/they•(talk) 20:52, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

Hi @Sarsenet, thank you for the welcome and the heads-up! I have been using some tools to help me structure the Wikipedia formatting (which I’m still learning), but I have personally verified every citation against the original news reports to ensure there are no fabrications or hoaxes. I am committed to following the five pillars and will continue to refine the draft to ensure it meets all manual of style requirements. Thanks for the guidance! Andyashua (talk) 10:14, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Martins Vincent Otse Initiative (March 5)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by SafariScribe was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

SafariScribe^{Edits! Talk!} 23:30, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Deji Adeyanju & Partners

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Deji Adeyanju & Partners, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator.

Mekomo (talk) 14:50, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

Draft:Deji Adeyanju

Hi. I've moved this article to draft. As a submission that was previously deleted, it is likely to be controversial and would benefit from an independent review. Please work on it in draft space before submitting for review. Deb (talk) 15:04, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

@Deb: please note that this was unilaterally moved back to mainspace rather than submitted for review, which would be more appropriate in the case of COI. Please also note that Deji Adeyanju & Partners has been restored - is this identical to the deleted version? Could it be speedied? Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:17, 19 May 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for the note. I acknowledge the COI concern and will ensure future

submissions go through Articles for Creation (AfC) for review. This version is

not identical to the deleted version it has been substantially expanded with

additional sections

new references from multiple independent sources Andyashua (talk) 16:27, 19 May 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of Deji Adeyanju & Partners for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Deji Adeyanju & Partners is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deji Adeyanju & Partners until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

ɴᴅᴀʜɪʀᴏ ᴅᴇʀʀɪᴄᴋ 🐎 (talk) 22:28, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Andyashua. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Deji Adeyanju & Partners, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the Edit Request Wizard), including links or details of reliable sources that support your suggestions;
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Please also disclose regarding Deji Adeyanju on your user page Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:18, 19 May 2026 (UTC)

Hi Spiderone, thank you for reaching out. I have no conflict of interest

here I have no relationship, affiliation, or financial connection to

Deji Adeyanju or Deji Adeyanju & Partners. I am simply an independent

editor who believes the firm meets Wikipedia's notability criteria. I am

open to the article going through AfC review if required. Andyashua (talk) 16:33, 19 May 2026 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Deji Adeyanju and Partners logo.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Deji Adeyanju and Partners logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:09, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

May 2026

Hello, I'm AntiDionysius. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Deji Adeyanju, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. AntiDionysius (talk) 16:18, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Andyashua. It has been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 01:03, 22 May 2026 (UTC)

Hi Andyashua, please do not use alternate accounts except for legitimate purposes. Also, you must disclose if you are being paid to edit and, for the most part, avoid the use of large language models on Wikipedia. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 01:03, 22 May 2026 (UTC)