User talk:Amorymeltzer/Archive 4

Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6Archive 10

Welcome to STiki!

Hello, Amorymeltzer, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Here are some pages which are a little more fun:

  • The STiki leaderboard - See how you are faring against other STiki users!
  • Userboxes - Do not hesitate to wear the STiki label with pride by choosing from a selection of userboxes!

We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (developer) and TheStrikeΣagle 05:14, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Happy Easter!!!

Schrödinger's pussy

I disagree with your closer of Schrödinger's pussy as "delete", it looks like a "no consensus" to me. You said ""Pussy" may indeed be a synonym for "cat" but I find the argument that that implies Schrödinger's pussy is therefore reasonable to be unconvincing." It doesn't really matter weather the creator had poor faith, because every one of those keeps was good faith, and we're judging the redirect itself, not the creator. You personality don't, but I, and almost all the other keeps did (also WP:CHEAP). Lastly, there were almost as many keep votes as there were delete votes. Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 18:55, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

I will agree that the faith of the creator is not in of itself a deciding factor - although it was worth mentioning as the page might have easily been proffered under WP:CSD#G3 at the time - you are correct that I was judging consensus toward the redirect only and not the editor. As for the close itself, of course you and the other keep !votes feel it should have been kept, that is why there is a consensus-determining process. Consensus is not a direct vote, and when judging consensus one must weigh the value of any side. On the one hand, those voicing for a Keep decision essentially said "Eh, technically pussy means cat" but could not answer the concern that "pussy" equates to "cat" doesn't imply that "Schrodinger's pussy" equates to "Schrodinger's cat"; that argument was quite strong. On the other hand, the redirect was unencyclopedic and an unlikely search term, claims made by those favoring a Delete outcome which were not successively countered. Sure, a number of good editors in good faith thought it should remain, and sure, the numbers were largely the same, but the fact remains that the arguments levied were not equivalent. ~ Amory (utc) 21:40, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
As for answering the concern that "pussy" equates to "cat" doesn't imply that "Schrodinger's pussy" equates to "Schrodinger's cat", that was implied. "Pussy" = "cat" (or "vagina", but that that meaning is irreverent here). "Schrodinger's pussy" = incorrect name for "Schrodinger's cat" (say, if someone miss-remembers the exact word used for "cat" in that pharise).
As for what you said about judging consensus and weigh the value of any side, that's exactly what I did when I voted (I'm one of the people who closes RFD's). I judged that "harmless" and "No compelling reason to delete" concerns (which were not successively countered) was much stronger then the "Eh, technically "Schrodinger's pussy" doesn't equate to "Schrodinger's cat" argument. Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 22:16, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
Then we disagree. I find "unencyclopedic," "implausible," and "joke redirect" all to be valid reasons for deletion. ~ Amory (utc) 22:58, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Mediumship mistake

Thanks, made a mistake.-19afisher — Preceding unsigned comment added by 19afisher1 (talkcontribs) 01:06, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

United Macedonia vandal

Hello, I noticed you just blocked 101.162.40.180 for vandalizing the United Macedonia article. Could you please do the same to the new spinoff vandal, 121.222.147.227? Thanks. --Local hero talk 18:11, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

And 60.228.74.20 now, too. The article should probably be protected. --Local hero talk 18:14, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
 Done ~ Amory (utc) 18:29, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
Thanks. --Local hero talk 18:47, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q1 2013

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 6, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2013
Previous issue | Index | Next issue

Project At a Glance
As of Q1 2013, the project has:


Content


Project Navigation
To receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to sign up on the distribution list.

The Signpost: 01 April 2013

  • Special report: Who reads which Wikipedia?
    The Wikimedia Foundation has released its latest report card for the movement's hundreds of sites. The WMF has published statistics about the sites since 2009, but only recently have these been expanded in scope and depth to provide a rich source of data for investigating the movement and the world it serves. Dutch-born Erik Zachte is the driver of the WMF's statistical output, and he writes that the report card and accompanying traffic statistics comprise "enough tables, bar charts and plots to keep you busy for a while".
  • WikiProject report: Special: FAQs
    This week's Report is dedicated to answering our readers' questions about WikiProjects. The following Frequently Asked Questions came from feedback at the WikiProject Report's talk page, the WikiProject Council's talk page, and from previous lists of FAQs.
  • Featured content: What the ?
    The Signpost interviewed prolific featured content creator and former Signpost "featured content" report writer Crisco 1492 about ? and Indonesian cinema. ? was the "Today's featured article" for 1 April 2013. 1 April is popularly known as April Fools' Day in many countries.
  • Arbitration report: Three open cases
    A case brought by Lecen involves several articles about former Argentinian president Juan Manuel de Rosas (17931877).

Permiso

Hola. Gracias por atender mi solicitud. Creí que eran mínimo cincuenta ediciones, pues así es en es-wp. Saludos!!--Diego Leandro 19:39, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

De nada. ~ Amory (utc) 19:44, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Granting confirmed right

Hello, I noticed you granted the confirmed user right to Csamantello (talk · contribs) in response to a request to unprotect Troy High School (California) at WP:RFPP. Although the user's first few edits to that article have been constructive, the user has been edit warring with me over a BLP violation. I have asked the user to engage me in discussion on the talk page and s/he responded with an edit summary that indicates that s/he did not even read the relevant talk page discussion. Additionally, I noted from his/her request at WP:RFPP () that s/he claimed to be a representative of the school administration; however, according to the school's website there is no indication that a person by this name is on the staff ().

I respectfully request that you reconsider granting this user right. Thank you. KuyaBriBriTalk 21:07, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

I think it was really inappropriate for you to template Csamantello like that. You are clearly an involved editor, having made the exact same number of reverts as Csamantello has. How would you feel if s/he placed that template on your page? Please reread WP:BITE. The user has now commented on the talk page and is clearly without intent to further contribute, which I do not consider a good thing. There is some merit to your assertion for BLP concerns in regards to some of the names, however Csamantello even provided you with a source. You yourself failed to engage on the talkpage, opting not to go the bold-revert-discuss route. At any rate, your request is a moot point given that the user only needs to wait a couple of days before being autoconfirmed and that the editor has indicated disengagement. ~ Amory (utc) 23:20, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #52

Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.
  • Development
    • The first year is over. Thank you everyone for being amazing and helping to build Wikidata and making it more than we could possibly have hoped for already. <3
    • Put a lot of work into improved support for Internet Explorer 8
    • Worked on improving recent changes code in client
    • Finished valueview refactoring. Created new extension “ValueView”
    • Implemented string formatter
  • Discussions/Press
  • Events
    • upcoming: GLAM-Wiki 2013
  • Other Noteworthy Stuff
    • Deployment of phase 2 on English Wikipedia is currently planned for April 8. The remaining Wikipedias are scheduled for April 10. As usual this might change if we run into problems along the way.
    • There is now a page showing the current lag for changes propagating to the Wikipedias so they can show up in watchlists and recent changes for example. This should ideally be in the range of a few minutes. Right now it is higher because of some abnormally high bot activity but decreasing. Should be down to a few minutes soon.
    • There’s now a badge you can add to Wikipedia articles to indicate there is data about it on Wikidata
    • We hit Q10000000
    • A Wikidata item in the wild ;-)
  • Did you know?
  • Open Tasks for You

Based on feedback for last week’s call for comments we will continue this newsletter. However more community help will be needed. From now on they’ll be drafted at d:Wikidata:Status updates/Next and your help is very welcome.

I strongly disagree

I strongly disagree with you syaing that I am a sock puppet of user:Dy11111. I truly don't know "User:Dy11111". May you remove me from the list?? Because I just decided to open up that case. I have nothing to do with "user:Dy11111"! - Cre81ve 07:26, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Perth Montessori School

202.72.153.151 (talk · contribs) - Recently caught this one vandalising the article above just hours after you blocked 58.7.107.74 (talk · contribs) post-AIV - any indications of socking/block evasion? hmssolent\Let's convene My patrols 08:21, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Likely WP:DUCK block-evasion, evidenced by this edit. I was asleep, though, so this is now a bit stale due to timezones. There's a bit of a history so I just semi'd it for a brief period. ~ Amory (utc) 13:15, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

You have a message!

Hello, Amorymeltzer. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback.
Message added 11:54, 8 April 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

- Jayadevp13 11:58, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Melissa Tanataquidgeon Zobel

Hello Amorymeltzer,

I am DPWinslow and currently a senior at UNH looking to create a wikipedia article as a class project. The class is an upper level English course focused on contemporary Native American authors. My author is Melissa Tanataquidgeon Zobel and I've had a couple issues in creating the article. First of all, in my sandbox, I have all of the references and internal links properly done. However, when I copied and pasted the information into the "create article" section where it is now pending, none of the links transferred just the text. I believe it will be rejected since it doesn't include the links. I wanted to know how to make exactly what is in my sandbox become the content for article submission. The other issue is that I inadvertently created an article titled "Melissa Tantaquidgeon Zobel", and once again the text was all that transferred and not the links. I deleted the article and the blank page received the speed deletion process. Now I can't create my article because of this prior error, since the page already exists. How can I create the article with all its references and links as it is displayed in my sandbox? I am very new to Wikipedia and would appreciate any assistance.

Best regards,

Parker Winslow DPWinslow (talk) 21:46, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi! Glad to hear that you're working hard, and sorry you've had some issues! As far as I can see, I think your basic problem is that you are copying the text you see at User:DPWinslow/sandbox instead of moving the content from the inside of the edit page. Now, as it turns out, that's a good thing because simply copying and pasting material doesn't result in a perfect paper trail of edits and contribution history. That paper trail is required by the copyright policies that Wikipedia operates under ([creativecommons.org Creative Commons CC-BY-SA]). The way to get around this issue is simple, use the "move" button on your screen. That will allow you to move your sandbox into the main, article space, while specifying an appropriate page name.
But hold on! It's not quite ready for primetime. The edits you made the past three days (one each) were to basically copy and paste the text back in there. That's why the page content is essentially duplicated, but the references don't show up and instead you just have numbers like this: [8]. Nobody wants that. Plus, the templates you placed on the page, namely the ones for an Articles for Creation review and the User Sandbox don't belong in a mature article either. If you feel confident in the quality of the page you can remove those as well, and then move it.
If you'd like, why not remove the duplicate content, get it ready for moving, and then post back here if you want me to give it a once over. I'd be happy to answer any other questions, too. (Although I'm a tad busy at the moment so may not respond swiftly) ~ Amory (utc) 22:10, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for granting me the reviewer right! Jsharpminor (talk) 04:11, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 08 April 2013

  • Wikizine: WMF scales back feature after outcry
    Numerous Wikimedia Commons editors have chimed in on the Wikimedia Foundation's deployment of a new feature to its mobile website. Allowing anonymous users to register and upload pictures for use in an article, the feature was placed prominently at the top of Wikipedia articles in multiple languages.
  • WikiProject report: Earthshattering WikiProject Earthquakes
    This week, we felt the world tremble in the presence of WikiProject Earthquakes. The project was started in May 2008 to deal with articles about earthquakes, aftershocks, seismology, seismologists, plate tectonics, and related articles. While the project has seen success building 14 Featured Articles, one A-class Article, and 21 Good Articles, a fairly heavy workload remains, with a relative WikiWork rating of 4.94. WikiProject Earthquakes maintains a portal, a list of open tasks, a popular pages listing, and an article alerts watchlist.
  • News and notes: French intelligence agents threaten Wikimedia volunteer
    Last Friday, the Wikimedia movement awoke to news that one of their number—Rémi Mathis, a French volunteer editor—had been summoned to the offices of the interior intelligence service DCRI and threatened with criminal charges and fines if he did not delete an article on the French Wikipedia about a radio station used by the French military.
  • Arbitration report: Subject experts needed for Argentine History
    The arbitration committee is looking for expertise in Argentina and the Spanish language for a case involving former Argentinean president Juan Manuel de Rosas (1793–1877).
  • Featured content: Wikipedia loves poetry
    Four articles and two pictures were promoted to "featured" status on the English Wikipedia this week.
  • Technology report: Testing week
    The deployment of phase 2 of Wikidata to the English Wikipedia, originally scheduled for 8 April but delayed due to technical problems, may be rescheduled again as the result of community resistance.

Wikipedia Meetup NYC this Sunday April 14

Hi Amorymeltzer! You're invited to our next meeting for Wikipedia Meetup NYC on Sunday April 14 -this weekend- at Symposium Greek Restaurant @ 544 W 113th St (in the back room), on the Upper West Side in the Columbia University area.

Please sign up, and add your ideas to the agenda for Sunday. Thanks!

Delivered on behalf of User:Pharos, 17:49, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

DC meetup & dinner on Saturday, April 13!

Please join Wikimedia DC for a social meetup and dinner at Vapiano (near Farragut North/Farragut West) on Saturday, April 13 at 5:30 PM All Wikipedia/Wikimedia and free knowledge/culture enthusiasts, regardless of editing experience, are welcome to attend! All ages welcome!

For more information and to sign up, please see Wikipedia:Meetup/DC 36. Hope to see you there! Kirill [talk] 19:11, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Amorymeltzer. You have new messages at Camyoung54's talk page.
Message added 20:49, 10 April 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

- Camyoung54 talk 20:49, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #53

Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.
  • Development
    • Got some external professional review of our code and architecture and started working on their feedback
    • Worked on reducing the dispatch lag (the time it takes for changes on Wikidata to be sent to the Wikipedias for display in watchlist, recent changes and to purge affected pages)
    • Worked on using Redis for job queue to improve the lag situation even further
    • Created new Wikibase Query extension for phase 3 functionality
    • Autocomments & Autosummaries for SetClaim module
    • Worked on the GeoCoordinate parser
  • Events/Press
    • right now: GLAM-WIKI 2013
  • Discussions
  • Other Noteworthy Stuff
    • Deployment of phase 2 on the remaining Wikipedias was delayed because of a high lag of changes being propagated to the Wikipedias. The lag has been reduced considerably now and is going down even more. The new date for deployment will not be next week because there are other large changes on Wikimedia infrastructure scheduled that we do not want to interfere with. It will hopefully happen very soon after that though.
    • Next code update on wikidata.org is planned for Wednesday. This should include qualifiers and bugfixes.
    • There will probably be a short outage/read-only for wikidata.org on Tuesday (database is being switched to MariaDB)
    • If you're a student and interested in coding on Wikidata consider applying for Google Summer of Code.
    • There is a new user right: property creators
    • There is now a page to request deletion of a property
    • We now have Bureaucrats
    • Reasonator was improved and extended (1 2)
  • Open Tasks for You

Based on feedback for last week’s call for comments we will continue this newsletter. However more community help will be needed. From now on they’ll be drafted at d:Wikidata:Status updates/Next and your help is very welcome.

Read the full report · Unsubscribe · Global message delivery 23:24, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Reviewer rights

Thanks for granting me reviewer rights! --Cameron11598 (Converse) 02:22, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for granting me reviewer rights. Levdr1lostpassword / talk 15:05, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Regarding rollback rights.

Do you think I am now capable of holding the rollback rights? Earlier you had told me at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback that I contact you at your talk page after a week. I have done a lot of reviewing and anti-vandalism edits after that. I would be happy if you provide me with the rollback permission and promise to take maximum care while using it. - Jayadevp13 16:05, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
Okay, I'm granting this. You have done a fair bit of reviewing lately, but most of that isn't rollback-ready. Please remember to be careful when using rollback - it should basically only be used on other editors if you are going to warn them. The "vandalism" link on Twinkle is essentially the same thing. Good luck and happy editing! ~ Amory (utc) 16:37, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
Thank you. Thanks a lot. You can take it back if you think I am misusing it. - Jayadevp13 11:05, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Chocoholic

Hello! You recently deleted the redirect page Chocoholic since it was pointing toward a deleted page, Chocoholism. Actually the Chocoholism page was about to be restored after rewriting, but somebody jumped the gun and set up this redirect before the target article was moved to mainspace. Chocoholism is live now; is it OK with you if I restore Chocoholic as a redirect? Thanks. --MelanieN (talk) 02:38, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Did it myself. Glad to see it returned! ~ Amory (utc) 14:22, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
Thank you! --MelanieN (talk) 14:34, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

DC meetups on April 19 and 20

Wikimedia DC invites you to join us for two exciting events this weekend:

On the evening of Friday, April 19, we're hosting our first-ever WikiSalon at our K Street office. The WikiSalon will be a twice-monthly informal meetup and collaborative editing event to help build the community of Wikimedia enthusiasts here in DC; please join us for its inaugural session. Light refreshments will be provided.

On Saturday, April 20, we've partnered with the George Washington University to host the All Things GW Edit-a-Thon at the Teamsters Labor History Research Center. Please join us for behind-the-scenes tours of the University Archives and help edit articles about GWU history.

We look forward to seeing you at one or both of these events! Kirill [talk] 20:16, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Your input is requested

Greetings, Amorymeltzer/Archive 4! If we have not met, I'm AutomaticStrikeout. I've come here to ask you to take part in the survey at User:AutomaticStrikeout/Are admins interested in a RfB?. I am trying to gauge the general level of interest that administrators have in running for cratship, as well as pinpoint the factors that affect that interest level. Your input will be appreciated. Happy editing, AutomaticStrikeout (TCSign AAPT) 02:01, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks

Hey. Thanks for creating the redirect Tom Ellison—I was just about to re-request its creation (I thought the declining reason was poor), and saw that you'd created it. - Shudde talk 10:19, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

"Butcher of the Balkans"

You closed the RfD discussion by keeping the redirect, but the article had become a fairly stable disambiguation page in the middle of the process. Someone brought that up at the RfD and the remainder of the discussion did not provide a clear WP:PRIMARYTOPIC deliberation.

After that point, the original nominator mentioned consistent use, but that's not the same as primary topic. One editor (User:Thryduulf) then said:

Milošević is the primary use of the term. It is also, but less often used for Mladić [...] and also Ante Pavelić. [...] I wonder if an article about the epithet would be possible? As for this case, I think the redirect to Milošević should stay and the dab page be linked from a hatnote.

After that, User:Evlekis argued:

The label bestowed on Mladić is far more common than most realise [...]

And this was backed up by User:PRODUCER.

Later, Thryduulf said:

There has to be disambiguation, yes, but this title does not have to be a dab page - if there is a primary topic then his should be a redirect and either hatnotes or Butcher of the Balkans (disambiguation) should contain the disambiguation.

So they were no longer insisting on Milošević being the primary topic - it became a conditional.

Later still, I also argued Milošević didn't meet the primary topic criteria. Nobody argued with me about it for another week.

Overall, of all the people who earlier in the discussion said "keep" - as in "don't delete the redirect" - none of them have actually consistently argued against a full disambiguation page.

Would you please adjust the outcome to something that won't make moving the disambiguation page back in place look out of order? --Joy [shallot] (talk) 07:02, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Are you saying that since moving the locations of the disambiguations would be out of process, I should retroactively change how I interpreted the discussion? That is completely backwards. Here's what I read:
  • 6 different editors felt the redirect should be kept, some rather strongly.
  • Emmette noted that it had been turned into a disambiguation.
  • Following that, there was Producer !voting keep, which we can interpret to mean the dab, Evlekis, who had switched from delete to keeping the dab (despite still arguing against WP:RNEUTRAL), and yourself.
That's it. Pointing to Thryduulf is silly - it's just one editor, and one editor who said "As for this case, I think the redirect to Milošević should stay and the dab page be linked from a hatnote." S/he was speaking in the general in your quote, responding to Evlekis' demand that there "has to be a disambiguation," noting even that this did not need to be that place. That was a surprising number of people for an RfD discussion, the fact that nobody else joined for a few days is not particularly surprising. Besides, absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
At any rate, I've got nothing invested in this aside from how I feel I interpreted the discussion. I'm not 100% sure that WP:DRV is the place to go for this, are you more experienced over there? It doesn't seem like a perfect fit but I'm not sure where else we might take this sort of thing outside of some canvassing. ~ Amory (utc) 14:52, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
You're not considering the fact that the original discussion came about as a choice between keeping the redirect and deleting it. Of course people !voted to keep it because it does actually refer to Milošević (quite often). But, the original discussion did not entertain the possibility of disambiguation - nor did it have to, really. My point is that the premise changed with the introduction of that possibility - the notion of keeping or deleting the redirect became moot because both would mean deleting a disambiguation page - which isn't what was discussed. I think canvassing those six people would be useful, to see where they stand. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 21:36, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
Well I don't think that's true. Evlekis tried to speedy it, which was inappropriate, so when Fvasconcellos brought it up it was to merely have a discussion. It's redirects for discussion, not deletion, after all. I don't know that it makes everyone's opinion moot, the fact that they never even considered a disambiguation could even imply they didn't think it worthy; the only editor from before the dab'ing was Thryduulf, who still wanted a redirect. You don't think DRV would be appropriate, then? I guess I'm not opposed to WP:CANVASS but it just seems... weird. ~ Amory (utc) 22:09, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

What it needs is a fresh round of talks concerning those that took original interest. There are issues with the current arrangement which would never have materialised had we all believed the sobriquet was the exclusive preserve of one individual. I for one have explained why this is all inappropriate on Talk:Butcher of the Balkans (disambiguation) and in light of the fact that it is clear certain users favour a separate layout, I believe there should be a platform for discussion somewhere. Evlekis (Евлекис) (argue) 04:26, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 April 2013

  • Op-ed: How do we fix RfA inactivity?
    The RfA process is widely discussed here on the English Wikipedia and it has been well documented that less and less new Requests for adminship are being filed. There are an abundance of bytes devoted to the discussion and analysis of this situation and plenty of hands have been wrung over the matter. Various RfCs have attempted to find a way to fix the problem. Many proposals have been made offering solutions, some more potentially drastic than others, with the goal of making the changes necessary to kick–start RfA back into regular action. However, Wikipedia operates based on consensus and, to this point, there are have simply been too many disagreeing views for us to reach a consensus on how to increase RfA activity.
  • WikiProject report: Unity in Diversity: South Africa
    This week, we ventured to WikiProject South Africa. The project was started in February 2005 and is home to thirteen pieces of featured material, two A-class articles, and twenty-one good articles.
  • News and notes: Another admin reform attempt flops
    The most recent move to reform the requests for adminship process on the English Wikipedia has failed, after a complex and drawn-out three-step procedure for community input was subject to decreasing participation as time wore on and came up with no clear consensus.

An Barnstar for You!

The AFC Backlog Buster Barnstar

Congratulations, Amorymeltzer! You're receiving a Brownie because you reviewed 45 articles during the recent AFC Backlog elimination drive! Thank you for you contributions to Wikipedia at-large and helping to keep the backlog down. We hope you continue reviewing submissions and stay in touch at the talk page. Thank you and keep up the good work! Mdann52 (talk) 12:18, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Deletion review for Butcher of the Balkans

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Butcher of the Balkans. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 08:14, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi, would you like to help with H7N9 bird flu?

Hi,

I'm writing to recent participants on the influenza page. I think it's important to cover H7N9, without making it overblown or overstating the case. Any time you can spare to help with the research and/or the editing will be most appreciated. Thanks. Cool Nerd (talk) 16:17, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #54

Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.
  • Development
    • Dispatch lag is now down to 0 so changes should show up very quickly on the Wikipedias in watchlists and recent changes
    • wikidata.org now always redirects to www.wikidata.org. This should among other things solve the issue where people were not able to edit when on wikidata.org (bugzilla:45005)
    • Fixed weird blocked-user/protected-page handling in UI (bugzilla:45140)
    • Final meetings for the external professional review of our code and architecture. They were quite happy with the quality of the codebase and gave useful tips for improvements
    • Worked on automatic summaries for editing claims
    • Investigation of different JavaScript frameworks dealing with date and time
    • Worked on using Redis and the job queue for change notifications to clients
    • Work on the storage code for answering queries
  • Events/Press
    • GLAM-WIKI 2013
    • upcoming: office hour on IRC about sources
    • upcoming: Opensource Treffen
    • upcoming: intro to Wikidata at the British Library
  • Discussions
  • Other Noteworthy Stuff
  • Open Tasks for You
Read the full report · Unsubscribe · Global message delivery 22:49, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Page deleted

Why was the Page for Sperry Marine deleted from Wikipedia? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.203.137.12 (talk) 11:51, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Sperry Marine was apparently deleted under the criterion for speedy deletion, namely G11, which is for pages that serve only to promote the subject. Basically, it had no verifiable references to establish notability and was highly promotional. ~ Amory (utc) 13:38, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Re: Speedy deletions

It looked like a nonsense one-liner to me, but the article got deleted anyway. NintendoFan (Talk, Contribs) 23:18, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

In this case, yes, I deleted it under A7. But G1 doesn't refer to length or to how it is written, just whether it is intelligible. ~ Amory (utc) 23:27, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 22 April 2013

  • WikiProject report: WikiProject Editor Retention
    This week, we spent some time with a project that develops tools and methods for improving the user experience in the hope that new users will continue editing the encyclopedia. The project was started in July 2012 and has grown to include 124 members. The project's members partner with the Teahouse and the Welcoming Committee to spread WikiLove, welcome new users, encourage civility, and other related activities.
  • News and notes: Milan conference a mixed bag
    The Wikimedia Conference is an annual meeting of the chapters to discuss their status and the organisational development of the Wikimedia movement. For the first time it included groups that wish to be considered for WMF affiliation as thematic organisations and one of the three groups that was recently affiliated as a user group. The conference was also attended by members of the Wikimedia Foundation's (WMF) Board of Trustees, the Funds Dissemination Committee (FDC), the WMF Affiliations Committee, and a representative of the Wikivoyage Association.
  • Featured content: Batfish in the Red Sea
    Nine articles, four lists, eight pictures, and one topic were promoted to "featured" status this week on the English Wikipedia.
  • Technology report: A flurry of deployments
    On Monday, the English Wikipedia became the 12th wiki to be able to pull data from the central Wikidata.org repository, with other wikis scheduled to receive the update on Wednesday.

GOCE April 2013 newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors April 2013 events newsletter

We finished the April blitz and are preparing to start our May backlog elimination drive.

The April 2013 events newsletter is now ready for review.

– Your project coordinators: Torchiest, BDD, and Miniapolis

Sign up for the May drive! To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 04:21, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #55

Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.
Read the full report · Unsubscribe · Global message delivery 21:49, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 April 2013

  • News and notes: Chapter furore over FDC knockbacks; First DC GLAM boot-camp
    The Funds Dissemination Committee released its recommendations to the WMF board last Sunday. The news that the Hong Kong chapter's application for US$212K had failed was followed by a strongly worded resignation announcement by Deryck Chan on the public Wikimedia-l mailing-list.
  • In the media: Wikipedia's sexism; Yuri Gadyukin hoax
    On 24 April 2013, novelist Amanda Filipacchi published what turned out to be an influential op-ed in the New York Times; illuminating the unusual background of the Yuri Gadyukin hoax.
  • Featured content: Wiki loves video games
    Nine articles, three lists, three pictures, and one topic were promoted to "featured" this week.
  • WikiProject report: Japanese WikiProject Baseball
    This week, we traveled to the Japanese Wikipedia's WikiProject Baseball for perspectives from a version of Wikipedia that treats WikiProjects as their own unique namespace (プロジェクト:) independent of "Wikipedia:".

Wiknic 2013

Wiknic 2013
Sunday, June 23rd · 12:34pm · Lake Merritt, Oakland
Theme: Hyperlocal list-making
Lake Merritt Wild Duck Refuge (Oakland, CA)

This year's 2013 SF Wiknik will be held at Lake Merritt, next to Children's Fairyland in Oakland. This event will be co-attended by people from the hyperlocal Oakland Wiki. May crosspollination of ideas and merriment abound!

Location and Directions

  • Location: The grassy area due south of Children's Fairyland (here) (Oakland Wiki)
    • Nearest BART: 19th Street
    • Nearest bus lines: NL/12/72
    • Street parking abounds

Wikidata weekly summary #56

Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion

I notice that you undertake work at this article. Have I put my query on that article's talk page in the wrong place ? It is hardly earth shattering in its consequence, but I would have thought that someone might have posted an opinion after this period of time. Thanks,

Derek R Bullamore (talk) 00:59, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

@Derek R Bullamore: Meh, just create the redirect. If it turns out there needs to be a dab later it's simple enough to do, but right now it hardly looks worthwhile to involve the other mentions. ~ Amory (utc) 14:23, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for the advice - I have created a redirect page at John Nemeth. Regards,
Derek R Bullamore (talk) 20:57, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

AIV

Hi Amory--please block Ilikeweiner (talk · contribs) as a VOA. Thank you. 207.157.121.52 (talk) 17:22, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Notifications box replacement prototypes released

Hey Amorymeltzer; Kaldari has finished scripting a set of potential replacements available to test and give feedback on. Please go to this thread for more detail on how to enable them. Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 14:58, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

DC meetup & dinner on Saturday, May 11!

Please join Wikimedia DC for a social meetup and dinner at Vapiano (near Farragut North/Farragut West) on Saturday, May 11 at 5:30 PM. All Wikipedia/Wikimedia and free knowledge/culture enthusiasts, regardless of editing experience, are welcome to attend! All ages welcome!

For more information and to sign up, please see the meetup page. Hope to see you there! Kirill [talk] 23:16, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: April 2013





Headlines
Read this edition in full Single-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

Unsubscribe · Global message delivery 21:49, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Thank You

Thank you for deleting the redirects. They were the result of the way Move works when moving from mainspace to mainspace, but when moving from user subpages to mainspace, it creates empty redirects. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:59, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Rodhullandemureturns

Did you know this was a sock of a banned user? [] Hell In A Bucket (talk) 13:50, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

Only after I blocked did I look up to see Rodhu had been banned. ~ Amory (utc) 13:53, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #57

Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.

The Signpost: 06 May 2013

  • News and notes: Candidates nominating for Foundation elections; Looking ahead to Wikimania 2014
    Although not yet in great numbers, candidates are coming forward for Wikimedia Foundation elections, which will be held from 1 to 15 June. The elections will fill vacancies in three categories, the most prominent of which will be the three community-elected seats on the ten-member Board of Trustees (or the first Board meeting after the election results are announced, if sooner). The current two-year terms for these trustee positions ends on 1 September.
  • Technology report: Foundation successful in bid for larger Google subsidy
    The Wikimedia Foundation will be receiving more than $100,000 worth of free developer time courtesy of internet giant Google, it was announced this week. The funds, allocated as part of Google's Summer of Code programme, will support up to 21 student developers through three months of coding time.
  • Featured content: WikiCup update: full speed ahead!
    May sees the beginning of Round 3 of the 2013 WikiCup, with 33 of the original 127 competitors remaining. ... six articles, ten pictures, and two portals were promoted to "featured" status on the English Wikipedia this week.
  • In the media: New Wikipedia for Schools edition; Anders Behring Breivik's Wikipedia contributions
    The SOS Children's Villages news service advised on 3 May 2013 that Wikipedia for Schools 2013 is nearly ready for release. ... On 26 April 2013, the Norwegian Broadcasting Corporation published an article reviewing Norwegian mass murderer Anders Behring Breivik's edits to the English Wikipedia, where it revealed the name of Breivik's English Wikipedia account.
  • WikiProject report: Earn $100 in cash... and a button!
    This week's English Wikipedia project, WikiProject Biophysics, is home to several experts in their fields and a collaboration with the Biophysical Society. The project is hosting a contest through July 15 with six contributors winning $100 in cash and given the opportunity to attend the 2014 meeting of the Biophysical Society in San Francisco. Other strong entries will be awarded barnstars online and everyone who contributes can receive a physical button mailed out to them.

You're invited...

to two upcoming Bay Area events:

  • Maker Faire 2013, Sat/Sun May 18-19, San Mateo -- there will have a booth about Wikimedia, and we need volunteers to talk to the public and ideas for the booth -- see the wiki page to sign up!
  • Edit-a-Thon 5, Sat May 25, 10-2pm, WMF offices in San Francisco -- this will be a casual edit-a-thon open to both experienced and new editors alike! Please sign up if on the wiki page if you can make it so we know how much food to get.

I hope you can join us at one or both! -- phoebe / (talk to me) 18:51, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

Question

If I create accounts, do administrators know my ip address? How to know my ip address if I create accounts? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fceefyahoo.ca (talkcontribs) 23:03, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

Another sysop replied on the user's talk page. ~ Amory (utc) 00:38, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 13 May 2013

  • News and notes: WMF–community ruckus on Wikimedia mailing list
    The removal of administrator rights from all volunteers on the Wikimedia Foundation's official website sparked a highly emotional reaction on the Wikimedia-l mailing list—one of the largest off-wiki methods of communication for the Wikimedia movement.
  • WikiProject report: Knock Out: WikiProject Mixed Martial Arts
    This week, we spent some time watching WikiProject Mixed Martial Arts, which was started in August 2005 and has grown to include 12 Good Articles and a Featured List.

DC WikiSalon on May 24

Wikimedia DC invites you to join us for our next DC WikiSalon, which will be held on the evening of May 24 at our K Street office.

The WikiSalon an informal gathering of Wikimedia enthusiasts, who come together to discuss the Wikimedia projects and collaboratively edit. There's no set agenda, and guests are welcome to recommend articles for the group to edit or edit on their own. Light refreshments will be provided.

We look forward to seeing you there! Kirill [talk] 18:31, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia Rollback

Hi There! You stated that you wont "outright deny" my request for rollback privileges, because of my 700 reverts in a period of 5 days (Using Twinkle) and most of those reverts was using Twinkle, they were also constructive. The last request I placed was denied for obvious reasons, but the admin told me to ask again once I have racked up some reverts, which I did. Please I stayed up all night trying to make Wikipedia a better place, I mainly want rollback to use Huggle and STiki. Cheers The Grand Cenobite (talk) 22:09, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

Rollback is not a big deal. I said I wasn't going to outright deny it because you clearly put in a massive effort but I just wanted to note for another passing sysop that you had a recent request. I am personally of the opinion that both time and edits are needed, sheer numbers isn't necessarily the whole thing. You're clearly enjoying reverting vandalism so why not just continue reverting and don't sweat it?
I will keep reverting vandalism for sure! Cheers The Grand Cenobite (talk) 23:19, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #58

Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.

The Signpost: 20 May 2013

  • WikiProject report: Classical Greece and Rome
    This week, we traveled to WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome. The project was started in May 2006 and has 37 featured articles.
  • In the media: Qworty incident continues
    Salon.com published another article detailing the ongoing incidents with Wikipedia user Qworty, who has identified himself as Robert Clark Young. It documents Qworty's role in the controversy involving Amanda Filipacchi's op-ed, which kindled a debate on Wikipedia sexism as it relates to categories, where Qworty was responsible for a series of revenge edits against Filipacchi in the days after she released her op-ed.
  • Featured content: Up in the air
    Nine articles, six lists, and eight pictures were promoted to "featured" status on the English Wikipedia this week.

Webinar / edit-a-thon at the National Library of Medicine (NLM)

Join us at the NLM next week, either in person or online, to learn about NLM resources, hear some great speakers, and do some editing!

organized by Wiki Project Med

On Tuesday, 28 May there will be a community Wikipedia meeting at the United States National Library of Medicine in Bethesda, Maryland - with a second on Thursday, 30 May for those who can't make it on Tuesday. You can participate either in-person, or via an online webinar. If you attend in person, USB sticks (but not external drives) are ok to use.

Please go to the event page to get more information, including a detailed program schedule.

If you are interested in participating, please register by sending an email to pmhmeet@gmail.com. Please indicate if you are coming in person or if you will be joining us via the webinar. After registering, you will receive additional information about how to get to our campus (if coming in-person) and details about how to join the webinar. Klortho (talk) 00:56, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #59

Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.
  • Events/Press
    • Linked Data in Business
    • currently: Hackathon in Amsterdam
  • Other Noteworthy Stuff
  • Did you know?
    • Newest properties: catalog code (P528), runway (P529), diplomatic relation (P530), diplomatic mission sent (P531), diplomatic mission sent (P531), port of registry (P532), target (P533), streak color (P534), Find a Grave (P535), ATP id (P536), twinning (P537), fracturing (P538), Museofile (P539)
    • Newest task forces: Ship task force
    • d:Template:Constraint:Item allows to check if items using a given property also have other properties. To find items to fix, it links to one of Magnus' tools and to a daily report. Sample: items with property mother should also have main type (GND) with value person.
  • Development
    • A lot of discussions and hacking at the MediaWiki hackathon on Amsterdam
    • Worked on content negotiation for the RDF export
    • Bugfixing for editing of time datatype
    • Added validation in the api for claim guids. This also resolves bug 48473, an exception being thrown in production, whenever a bot or api user requested a claim with an invalid claim guid
    • Improved error message popup bubbles to show HTML and parse the links correctly
    • Fixed bug 48679, to hide the view source tab for item and property pages
    • Testing on Diff extension and SQLstore
  • Open Tasks for You

G13

As for ANY speedy, you are supposed to look at the articles before you delete them, which you cannot do at 20 per minute. I do not think anybody can responsibly do them at the speed you are doing them , singlehanded, rather than nominating them for deletion for someone else to check. I have already rescued one two of your most recent deletions. One noted sportswriter, one head of a university, more probably.

G13 will be very useful, but not as you are doing it. Please stop doing them singlehanded until it can be discussed whether or not they need to be done by two admins. DGG ( talk ) 03:31, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

Quite right you are, DGG. But it is indeed quite possible to review all those articles over a period of over 4 days, which is in fact what I did. You've now rescued 3 as far as I can tell, but it sounds to me like your qualm is really more with the G13 criteria itself as well as the effectiveness and acceptability of reviewers at AfC. I note that mainspace viability is not actually a factor in the G13 criteria, and the obvious consensus in the talkpage discussion is against considering it, where, I'll note, you are one of only four editors disagreeing. This was never about mainspace viability - if it were, the article should never have been declined to begin with. ~ Amory (utc) 05:29, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
No, my qualm is not with G13, it's with the blind application of G13. I look forward to deleting several thousand G13s myself--in fact, it was I who brought forward the problem and suggested we remove the old ones that were unlikely to make articles. I know I am in a minority about what needs to be checked, and I would not continue in the minority unless I were prepared to actually do what I urge others to do, which is to not just examine the articles, but actually rescue them. I've now found a 4th, one of the mayors of Memphis, Tenn.,which I'll have ready in the morning. 4 out of about 40 I looked at, which is about half of the total -- some were obviously impossible. In addition to those 4, there were another 2 or 3 at least that would have been borderline had I restored them, and in fields I do not particular care to work. Normally I would restore them as afcs though not as articles, so that others could work on them, but at this point I don't want to do anything questionable. I think the fact that i found so many might help to convince people, and I want a clean case for it.
You say they should not have been declined; but they were declined because they needed significant work to complete. They were not in a state ready to be accepted, unless the person accepting them was prepared to to do the work themselves, and we usually try to encourage the original editor to do it. What was missing, was not following them up when they weren't worked on; it was missing because the AfC procedure makes no provision for that and nobody individually bothered, even tho some of the reviewers did comment specifically that the work was needed was practical. The real problem, is that the AfC procedure was set up so badly as to let the backlog get in this awful mess.
I apologize for sounding perhaps a little preemptory, but I am faced with the need to work on thousands of articles that others should be helping in but don't seem likely, and I want to do everything I possibly can to convince them before I give up in exhaustion. DGG ( talk ) 07:10, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
So... you're welcome! In all seriousness, I admire the massive effort you've been willing to undertake, but once again it sounds like your problem is with AfC. I'd be quite interested to hear what you think was set up so badly and how to stem the backlog tide, but what you are suggesting is a complete re-evaluation of every submitted draft. That, to me, is advocating a referendum on the entire AfC protocol, turning that into a two-reviewer process. I think you know better than most that notable topics are submitted to the CSD process every day, and as long as there is be a G13, submissions on notable topics will be deleted. The only way to avoid that is to review each one for, as was proposed, mainspace promise/non-AfDability, which is a backdoor way to re-review your fellow AfC reviewers. ~ Amory (utc) 20:23, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
True, I have many problems with AfC, as you will see from various discussions on my talk p., & one of which is the difficulty in reviewing articles. But I certainly intend to use G13--in fact, I was the one who proposed the general idea, though I am surprised people want to do it is so drastic a fashion after having totally neglected the matter for years. Having it is one of the improvements I want to make.
I certainly do intend to review the way people review afcs. When I became an admin, the main reason I gave for the buttons was the desire to review deleted articles, and this was for the purpose not just of catching bad deletions, but people deleting improperly. I've been doing it for 6 years now, and others have been checking also, and speedies are in general being done much more consistently, with much less single-handinded deletions on the grounds of IDONTTHINKITSNOTABLE. What gives me the authority? The inherent ability we all have at WP to correct each other, and the expectation and indeed the need in a crowd-sourcing project for us to do so. People tell me when they think I'm wrong, and if an experienced person tells me so, usually I decide that I may well have been wrong--and sometimes it has changed my own practice. If people think my work is generally reliable, it's not because of any inherent skill, but because they've been instructing me a long time, and I listen. DGG ( talk ) 16:15, 26 May 2013 (UTC)


Questions about my page "The TerraMar Project" being deleted

Hi Amorymeltzer

I created a page called The TerraMar Project (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Rakswami/The_TerraMar_Project), and was told that I didn't have relevant sources/press coverage for it to be published. I went back and found significant press coverage for it, and added the links, and resubmitted it for publishing. But the log now says the page has been deleted. Is this for some sort of copyright violation?

I'm trying to get this page published on behalf of the organisation and I want to explain to them why this happened. Could you please help? Did the entire article violate copyright laws or was it only certain sections? If yes, how and which sections? Also is there any way I can recover the text of my article?

Thanks.

Best Rakshita Rakswami (talk) 07:36, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 May 2013

  • News and notes: First-ever community election for FDC positions
    Alongside the Signpost's interviews with the Wikimedia Foundation's (WMF) Board of Trustees candidates, the Signpost asked the candidates for the Funds Dissemination Committee (FDC) and its Ombudsperson position a series of questions relating to the positions they may be taking on. For the FDC candidates, this will include specific recommendations to the WMF on how to disburse over US$11 million in donors' funds to affiliate organizations, something which appears to have garnered little attention from the editing community at large so far.
  • In the media: Pagans complain about Qworty's anti-Pagan editing
    In the continuing saga of User:Qworty's outing as author Robert Clark Young, several blogs and websites covered the now-banned user's anti-Pagan editing. In an article published on 22 May 2013, TechEye described Qworty's edits as a "reign of terror" and were pleased to find that he had not succeeded in removing several prominent Pagan biographies from the encyclopedia.
  • WikiProject report: WikiProject Geographical Coordinates
    This week, we plotted out the demarcations of WikiProject Geographical Coordinates, which aims to create a single standard of handling coordinates in Wikipedia articles.
  • Featured content: Life of 2π
    Twelve articles, four lists, and twelve pictures were promoted to "featured" status on the English Wikipedia this week.
  • Technology report: Amsterdam hackathon: continuity, change, and stroopwafels
    Second only to the technical track of Wikimania in terms of numbers, the Berlin Hackathon (20092012) provided those with an interest in the software that underpins Wikimedia wikis and supports its editors a place to gather, exchange ideas and learn new skills.

Wikidata weekly summary #60

Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.

DC WikiSalon on June 6

Wikimedia DC invites you to join us for our next DC WikiSalon, which will be held on the evening of Thursday, June 6 at our K Street office.

The WikiSalon an informal gathering of Wikimedia enthusiasts, who come together to discuss the Wikimedia projects and collaboratively edit. There's no set agenda, and guests are welcome to recommend articles for the group to edit or edit on their own. Light refreshments will be provided.

We look forward to seeing you there! Kirill [talk] 12:02, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

GOCE May drive wrap-up

Guild of Copy Editors May 2013 backlog elimination drive wrap-up newsletter

We have completed our May backlog elimination drive.

The drive wrap-up newsletter is now ready for review.

– Your project coordinators: Torchiest, BDD, and Miniapolis

Sign up for the June blitz! To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 04:52, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Have time on Saturday?

I'm sorry for the last-minute notice, but on Saturday, June 8, from 3 to 6 PM, Wikimedia DC and the Cato Institute are hosting a Legislative Data Meetup. We will discuss the work done so far by WikiProject U.S. Federal Government Legislative Data to put data from Congress onto Wikipedia, as well as what more needs to be done. If you have ideas you'd like to contribute, or if you're just curious and feel like meeting up with other Wikipedians, you are welcome to come! Be sure to RSVP here if you're interested.

I hope to see you there!

(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for D.C.-area events by removing your name from this list.)

Harej (talk) 04:04, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 05 June 2013

  • From the editor: Signpost developments
    I am excited to announce that a Portuguese-language journal, Correio da Wikipédia has been launched by Vitorvicentevalente. It has just published its third edition, and I encourage readers who speak the language to read and contribute to its already-expansive coverage of the Portuguese Wikipedia and the Wikimedia movement.
  • Featured content: A week of portraits
    Five articles, four lists, and thirteen images were promoted to "featured" status this week on the English Wikipedia.
  • Discussion report: Return of the Discussion report
    This is mostly a list of requests for comment believed to be active on 4 June 2013 linked from subpages of Wikipedia:RfC or watchlist notices.
  • In the media: China blocks secure version of Wikipedia
    An article on TheNextWeb.com says that the Chinese Government has effectively blocked Wikipedia by cutting off access to the HTTP Secure (https) "workaround", almost completely cutting off access to those in China.
  • WikiProject report: Operation Normandy
    This week, we reflect on the anniversary of D-Day by storming the shores of Operation Normandy, a special initiative of WikiProject Military History.

Wikidata weekly summary #61

Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.

DC meetup & dinner on Saturday, June 15!

Please join Wikimedia DC for a social meetup and dinner at Vapiano (near Farragut North/Farragut West) on Saturday, June 15 at 5:30 PM. All Wikipedia/Wikimedia and free knowledge/culture enthusiasts, regardless of editing experience, are welcome to attend! All ages welcome!

For more information and to sign up, please see the meetup page. Hope to see you there! Kirill [talk] 19:35, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

20:02, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 12 June 2013

  • News and notes: How Wikimedia affiliates are spending $8.4 million; PRISM scandal
    Late last year, the Funds Dissemination Committee (FDC) awarded $8.4 million in donors' money to 11 Wikimedia entities, including the Wikimedia Foundation and 10 nationally defined chapters. Under this arrangement, these organisations are required to issue quarterly reports on how far they have progressed towards their declared programmatic and financial goals. The FDC has now announced that all 11 completed and submitted their reports by the 1 April deadline, and have responded to each.
  • Featured content: Mixing Bowl Interchange
    Seven articles, two lists, five pictures, and one topic were promoted to "featured" status on the English Wikipedia this week.
  • In the media: VisualEditor will "change world history"
    In an article published by the Huffington Post's United Kingdom edition, writer Thomas Church asserts that the new VisualEditor will change history, literally. It says that Wikipedia's mark-up language has been to its advantage, as most people didn't bother trying to learn it
  • Op-ed: The tragedy of Wikipedia's commons
    I've long thought that we should get rid of the Wikimedia Commons as we know it. Commons has evolved into a project with interests that compete with the needs of the primary users of Commons and the reason it was created. It's also understaffed, which results in poor curation, large administrative backlogs, and poor policy development.
  • Traffic report: Who holds the throne?
    Last week's most popular article list on the English Wikipedia was dominated by the massively popular TV series Game of Thrones, which claimed six slots in the top 25, including the top three. Its popularity was likely stoked by the most recent episode, The Rains of Castamere. Bollywood continued to increase its share of views as well, aided by the tragic suicide of star Nafisa Khan.
  • WikiProject report: Processing WikiProject Computing
    This week, we spent some time with WikiProject Computing. Started in October 2003, the project has grown to include 17 featured articles, 11 featured lists, 3 pieces of featured media, and 80 good articles.

recover page deleted

Good Morning,

I would like to recover the text deleted in order to edit it. Do you think it would be possible? Im sorry to disturb, but Im new here and Im still learning which info I can or can't put in my article. Thanks so much!!

Have a great Friday! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cathykrier (talkcontribs) 07:51, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Replied at User talk:Anne Delong ~ Amory (utc) 14:52, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #62

Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.

Join us this Sunday for the Great American Wiknic!

Great American Wiknic DC at Meridian Hill Park
You are invited to the Great American Wiknic DC at the James Buchanan Memorial at Meridian Hill Park. We would love to see you there, so sign up and bring something fun for the potluck! :)

Boilerplate message generously borrowed from Wikimedia NYC. To unsubscribe from future DC area event notifications, remove your name from this list.

Harej (talk) 15:29, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 19 June 2013

  • Op-ed: Two responses to the 'Tragedy of Wikipedia's Commons'
    Following last week's op-ed by Gigs ("The Tragedy of Wikipedia's Commons"), the Signpost is carrying two contrary opinions from MichaelMaggs, a bureaucrat on Wikimedia Commons, and Mattbuck, a British Commons administrator.
  • Traffic report: Most popular Wikipedia articles of the last week
    The season finale of Game of Thrones ensured that the epic high fantasy series would dominate the top 10 again last week; however, it was joined by Maurice Sendak and Man of Steel.
  • News and notes: Swedish Wikipedia's millionth article leads to protests; WMF elections—where are all the voters?
    With erysichton elaborata, the Swedish Wikipedia passed the one million article Rubicon this week. While this is a mostly symbolic achievement, serving as a convenient benchmark with which to gain publicity and attention in an increasingly statistical world, the particular method by which the Swedish site has passed the mark has garnered significant attention—and controversy.
  • Featured content: Cheaper by the dozen
    Eleven articles, twelve lists, and eleven pictures were promoted to 'featured' status on the English Wikipedia this week.
  • Technology report: May engineering report published
    The WMF's engineering report for May was published recently on the Wikimedia blog and on the MediaWiki wiki ("friendly" summary version), giving an overview of all Foundation-sponsored technical operations in that month.
  • Arbitration report: The Farmbrough amendment requestautomation and arbitration enforcement
    Richard Farmbrough was set to have his day in court, but as events transpired, this was not to be so. On 25 March 2013, an accusation was made against Farmbrough at Arbitration Enforcement (AE), claiming that he violated the terms of an automated edit restriction. Within hours, Farmbrough had filed his own request with the arbitration committee, citing the newly filed AE request and claiming that the motion was being used "in an absurd way" in the filing of enforcement requests: "I have not made any edits that a sane person would consider automation."

Wikidata weekly summary #63

Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.
  • Discussions
  • Events/Press
  • Did you know?
    • Newest properties: E number (P628), edition of (P629), Paris city digital code (P630), structural engineer (P631), cultural properties of Belarus reference number (P632), Répertoire du patrimoine culturel du Québec identifier (P633), captain (P634), ISTAT ID (P635), route of administration (P636), Protein ID (P637), PDB ID (P638), RNA ID (P639), Léonore ID (P640), sport (P641), of (P642), Genloc Chr (P643), Genloc Start (P644), Genloc End (P645), Freebase identifier (P646), drafted by (P647), Open Library identifier (P648), NRHP (P649), RKDartists (P650), BPN (P651), UNII (P652), PubMed Health (P653), direction relative to location (P654)
  • Development
    • Worked on site-link group editing to make it possible to link to sisterprojects
    • Further work on input validation
    • Further work on handling invalid data gracefully
    • Use Serializers for generating API results
    • Finished selenium tests for TimeUI and CoordinateUI
    • Changed globe coordinate value input to use backend coordinate parser
    • Fixed issues with data type definitions not being available in the frontend
    • Wrote a little hack so that on statements with a long list of values you will always be able to see the name of the property of the current section you are in (since the label moves when scrolling the page)
  • Open Tasks for You

18:03, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

GOCE June/July 2013 events

Guild of Copy Editors July 2013 backlog elimination drive wrap-up newsletter

We have completed our June blitz and are about to commence our July backlog elimination drive.

The June/July 2013 events newsletter is now ready for review.

– Your project coordinators: Torchiest, BDD, and Miniapolis

Sign up for the July drive! To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 20:18, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 June 2013

  • Traffic report: Most-viewed articles of the week
    With most TV shows on hiatus for the summer, attention has turned to movies, celebrity and sports. The dramatic events at the 2013 Confederations Cup drew massive attention, as did summer blockbusters like Man of Steel and World War Z. But the most searched event of the week was the tragic and unexpected death of popular actor James Gandolfini on June 19.
  • News and notes: Election results released
    Less than three days after the close of voting, the volunteer election committee posted the results on Meta. The worldwide Wikimedia movement has elected three WMF trustees for two-year terms on the 10-seat Board: Samuel Klein (supported by 43.5% of voters), Phoebe Ayers (38.3%), and María Sefidari (35.6%). The new trustees will take their seats at a critical time for the movement: one of the first tasks in their terms will be to help the Board to find and approve the new executive director to take up the top job when Sue Gardner departs.
  • Featured content: Wikipedia in black + Adam Cuerden
    This week, the Signpost interviews Adam Cuerden, a Wikimedian who has been for years gathering featured pictures, and who constantly participates in what could be his favourite part of the project. Cuerden dedicates most of his time to scanning and restoring old, valuable illustrative works. He explains to us how the featured process works, its relation with other parts of the encyclopedia, and how pictures evolve before reaching featured status.
  • WikiProject report: WikiProject Fashion
    This week, we walked the runway with WikiProject Fashion. Started in March 2007, the project is home to 4 Featured Articles and 41 Good Articles. The project has a lengthy list of how you can help and a list of Article Alerts.

Wikidata weekly summary #64

Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.

14:18, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q2 2013

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 6, No. 2 — 2nd Quarter, 2013
Previous issue | Index | Next issue

Project At a Glance
As of Q2 2013, the project has:


Content


Project Navigation
To receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to sign up on the distribution list.

MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 15:13, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 03 July 2013

  • In the media: Jimmy Wales is not an Internet billionaire; a mass shooter's alleged Wikipedia editing
    Amy Chozick's profile of Jimmy Wales in the New York Times sparked significant controversy in international news outlets this week. Chozick's profile covered Wales's personal life, including his 12-year-old daughter, ex-wife, and current wife Kate Garvey, describing Wales himself as "a well-groomed version of a person who has been slumped over a computer drinking Yoo-hoo for hours." Chozick described his current role in Wikipedia as "Benevolent Dictator for Life", a statement which garnered conflict from all corners of the web, including from Wales, who responded to the piece as a whole with a lengthy talk page statement.
  • Featured content: Queen of France
    Four articles, four lists, and fifteen pictures were promoted to "featured" status on the English Wikipedia last week.
  • WikiProject report: Puppies!
    This week, the Signpost went to the kennel and interviewed WikiProject Dogs. The project has several featured and good articles, along with a large number of "Did you know" entries. We asked three project members about the challenges of creating, curating, and maintaining canine content in an increasingly dog-obsessed world.
  • News and notes: Wikipedia's medical collaborations gathering pace
    The key annual event in the Wikimedia calendar, Wikimania 2013, will be held in Hong Kong in just five weeks' time. Among the events will be a presentation by two people who are working to promote the development of medical content on Wikimedia projects. One is James Heilman of Wiki Project Med, a non-profit dedicated to making "clear, reliable, comprehensive, up-to-date educational resources and information in the biomedical and related social sciences freely available to all people in the language of their choice". The other is Lori Thicke, president of Translators Without Borders (TWB), the Connecticut-based organisation set up in 2010 to provide pro-bono translation services for humanitarian non-profits
  • Technology report: VisualEditor in midst of game-changing deployment series
    The VisualEditor extension has gone live by default to registered users on the English Wikipedia, marking a huge milestone in a project that has taken the best part of a decade to reach fruition. The extension was previously described as "the biggest and most important change to our user experience we’ve ever undertaken" by the WMF team behind it.
  • Traffic report: Yahoo! crushes the competition ... in Wikipedia views
    The real world made a strong showing in the top 10 last week, as news stories such as Yahoo!'s purchase of Tumblr, the murder of Odin Lloyd, the continuing drama over NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden and the ill-health of Nelson Mandela crowded out the usual roster of TV shows, movies, websites and video games. Not that they were entirely excluded, of course.
  • Arbitration report: Tea Party movement reopened, new AUSC appointments
    Following a one-month period of moderated discussion, Tea Party movement has been reopened by the Committee. The proposed decisions are currently being voted upon. Race and politics remains suspended pending the return of User:Apostle12.

Wikidata weekly summary #65

Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.

DC meetup & dinner on Saturday, July 13!

Please join Wikimedia DC for a social meetup and dinner at Vapiano (near Farragut North/Farragut West) on Saturday, July 13 at 6:00 PM. All Wikipedia/Wikimedia and free knowledge/culture enthusiasts, regardless of editing experience, are welcome to attend! All ages welcome!

For more information and to sign up, please see the meetup page. Hope to see you there! Kirill [talk] 00:09, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

18:28, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

You're Invited: Luce and Lunder Edit-a-thon at the Smithsonian

File:SAAM facade.jpg
American Art Museum
Luce and Lunder Edit-a-thon at the
Smithsonian American Art Museum

You're invited to the Luce and Lunder Edit-a-thon, part of a series of edit-a-thons organized by the Smithsonian American Art Museum to add and expand articles about American art and artists on Wikipedia.

This event will include a catered lunch and special tours of the Luce Foundation Center for American Art and the Lunder Conservation Center at the Smithsonian American Art Museum.

9:15 a.m. – 5:00 p.m. on Friday, July 19, 2013
Smithsonian American Art Museum
Meet at G Street Lobby (9th St. & G St. NW, Washington, D.C.)

Capacity is limited, so please sign up today!

If you would not like to receive future messages about meetups, please remove your name from our distribution list.
Message delivered by Dominic·t 23:50, 11 July 2013 (UTC).
Luce Foundation Center

The Signpost: 10 July 2013

  • News and notes: Wikimedia Foundation Board appoints world expert in women's issues, global south
    In apparent acknowledgment of the urgency of two issues facing the Wikimedia movement—the need to engage both women and the global south—the WMF Board has appointed Ana Toni as one of its four expert members. Toni will bring rare expertise to the movement, and the Signpost understands that her skills in advocacy and her key roles in international NGOs are likely to be a natural match with the WMF as the hub of disseminating free knowledge around the world.
  • Dispatches: Infoboxes: time for a fresh look?
    The fundamental idea of an infobox is clear: keep it simple and limited to essentials. At some point, however, these basic principles seem to have been abandoned, in favour of an approach akin to "the more the merrier".
  • Featured content: The week of the birds
    Five articles, six lists, and ten pictures were promoted to "featured" status on the English Wikipedia this week.

Wikidata weekly summary #66

Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.

17:28, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 July 2013

  • WikiProject report: WikiProject Square Enix
    This week, we explored the fantasy worlds of video game developer Square Enix by interviewing WikiProject Square Enix. The project began in September 2006 as a spin-off of WikiProject Final Fantasy, but today covers that, Kingdom Hearts, Dragon Quest, Chrono Trigger, and a variety of other game series, with exceptions explained in the interview below. The project is home to 32 pieces of Featured material and 104 Good and A-class articles.
  • News and notes: Wikimedia Foundation's new plans announced
    Last week the Wikimedia Foundation released its annual plan for July 2013 to June 2014. It provides a surprisingly frank view—of past achievements and failures, and future goals and risks—that could be afforded only by a non-profit that is confident and beholden to no commercial or political interests.
  • Featured content: Documents and sports
    Four articles, five lists, and sixteen pictures were promoted to "featured" status on the English Wikipedia this week.

Wikidata weekly summary #67

Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.

20:58, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

GOCE July 2013 news report

Guild of Copy Editors July 2013 backlog elimination drive mid-drive newsletter
  • Participation: Out of 30 people who have signed up for this drive so far, 18 have participated. If you have signed up for the drive but have not yet participated, it isn't too late. If you haven't signed up for the drive, sign up now!
  • Progress report: Thus far we have reduced the number of May/June 2012 articles to just 124 articles, so we're on the right track. Unfortunately, for the first time in GOCE history, the number of articles in the backlog has actually gone up during this drive. While all participants are currently doing a fine job, we just don't have as many of them as we have had in the past. We have over 500 editors on our mailing list, but only 18 editors who have done a copy edit for the drive. If you're receiving this newsletter, it's because you have an interest in copy editing. Join the drive! Even if you only copy edit one article, it helps. Imagine how much progress we could make if everyone chipped in just one article.

– Your drive coordinators: Torchiest, Baffle gab1978, Jonesey95, and The Utahraptor.

>>> Sign up now <<<

To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 22:03, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 July 2013

  • In the media: Wikipedia flamewars
    The Washington Post reported Tuesday on the most controversial articles on various language Wikipedias as determined by a cross-continental research group.
  • WikiProject report: WikiProject Religion
    This week, the Signpost delved into the vast and complex areas of beliefs, cultural systems, and world views that make up religion. WikiProject Religion has been around since 2005 and has a complex scope, in that it only takes articles that deal with religion in a non-sectarian sense, along with any articles that do not have a dedicated daughter project.
  • News and notes: Wikivoyage turns ten, but where to now?; Wikipedia Zero expands into India
    Contributors to Wikivoyage, the sister project adopted by the Wikimedia Foundation last year, are celebrating their 10th anniversary this week. ... The Wikimedia Foundation has announced via press release that it has partnered with Aircel to provide free mobile access to Wikipedia.
  • Traffic report: Gleeless
    Death hangs over the top 10 this week, as tragic deaths both past and present continued to cast their pall over an already troubled world. The death of Corey Monteith led to a spike in interest in the man himself, his girlfriend and co-star Lea Michele, and the show that made them both famous, Glee.
  • Featured content: Engineering and the arts
    Twelve articles, seven lists, and eight pictures were promoted to "featured" status on the English Wikipedia this week.
  • Arbitration report: Infoboxes case opens
    The case Infoboxes was opened. The evidence phase continues in Kiefer.Wolfowitz and Ironholds. Voting on the proposed decision continues in the Tea Party movement case.

Wikidata weekly summary #68

20:38, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 July 2013

  • Op-ed: The VisualEditor Beta and the path to change
    One of the narratives I've heard a lot is that Wikipedia is unable to change, that it's too stagnant, too poorly resourced, too inherently resistant to change. I don't believe that at all.
  • Traffic report: Bouncing Baby Brouhaha
    Somewhat predictably, the birth of a new heir to the House of Windsor on 22 July led the English-speaking world to suddenly embrace Monarchism. In honour of this occasion, the Traffic report will be assiduously employing British spelling and dating conventions. Cheers.
  • WikiProject report: Babel Series: Politics on the Turkish Wikipedia
    This week, we visited the Turkish Wikipedia for an interview with VikiProje Siyaset (WikiProject Politics). The project began in April 2010 and has sustained a small but enthusiastic group of editors focusing on both the domestic politics of Turkey and international politics. The basics for article quality and importance ratings have been determined, but tracking this data has not yet become widespread on the Turkish Wikipedia. The project maintains a portal, a variety of resources, and a rotating selection of images to spruce up the project's page.
  • News and notes: Gearing up for Wikimania 2013
    The ninth annual Wikimania conference will open in just over a week at the Jockey Club Auditorium, the Hong Kong Polytechnic University. Wikimania is for people worldwide who have an interest in Wikimedia Foundation projects. It features presentations and discussions on those projects, on free knowledge and content, and on related social and technical issues.

Wikidata weekly summary #69

DC meetup & dinner on Saturday, August 24!

Please join Wikimedia DC for a social meetup and dinner at Vapiano (near Farragut North/Farragut West) on Saturday, August 24 at 6:00 PM. All Wikipedia/Wikimedia and free knowledge/culture enthusiasts, regardless of editing experience, are welcome to attend! All ages welcome!

For more information and to sign up, please see the meetup page. Hope to see you there! Kirill [talk] 03:50, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #70

The Signpost: 07 August 2013

  • Arbitration report: Fourteen editors proposed for ban in Tea Party movement case
    Fourteen editors have been proposed for a six-month page ban in the Tea Party movement case. In the Infoboxes and Kiefer.Wolfowitz and Ironholds cases, the workshop and evidence phases have closed, and proposed decisions are scheduled to be posted.
  • Traffic report: Greetings from the graveyard
    It's crickets and tumbleweeds this week, as the top 10 sees its lowest view-count since the project began. If Wikipedia were selling anything, we'd be having a fire sale by now.
  • News and notes: Chapters Association self-destructs
    The opening days of the annual Wikimania, referred to as the "pre-conference", are not typically newsworthy. This changed dramatically when the Chapters Association council met on Thursday.
  • WikiProject report: WikiProject Freedom of Speech
    This week, we journey into a WikiProject that focuses about what keeps Wikipedia running, the freedom of speech.

account problem

hello, can you please help me ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vacezmaj (talkcontribs) 18:14, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

GOCE July 2013 copy edit drive wrap-up

Guild of Copy Editors July 2013 backlog elimination drive wrap-up newsletter

We have completed our July backlog elimination drive.

The drive wrap-up newsletter is now ready for review.

– Your project coordinators: Torchiest, Baffle gab1978, Jonesey95, and The Utahraptor.

Sign up for the August blitz! To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 23:08, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 August 2013

  • News and notes: "Beautifully smooth" Wikimania with few hitches
    About a thousand Wikimedians journeyed to Hong Kong this week for the annual Wikimania conference, the annual gathering of the Wikimedia movement. Wikimania, which has been held since 2005, serves as the principal physical meetup for Wikimedians around the world.
  • In the media: Chinese censorship
    One major story that came out of Wikimania was Jimmy Wales' statements at the conference that he would prefer to have Wikipedia banned entirely in mainland China than censored as it is currently.
  • Featured content: Wikipedia takes the cities
    The week's newest featured content includes seven articles, four lists, and twelve pictures.
  • Special report: Jimmy Wales: media favors entertainment over raising public awareness
    Jimmy Wales, co-founder of Wikipedia and its public face to most of the media, has declared that media organizations are missing out on the "opportunity of the century" by not conducting true investigative reporting into American surveillance practices, a debate kindled by information leaked by Edward Snowden.
  • Arbitration report: Kiefer.Wolfowitz and Ironholds case closes
    The Kiefer.Wolfowitz and Ironholds case has closed, with a unanimous decision to desysop a Wikimedia Foundation employee and indefinitely ban another editor. The Tea Party movement case has stalled yet again, in the wake of a controversial proposal to ban 14 editors. A proposed decision in the Infoboxes case was scheduled to be posted on 14 August.

Wikidata weekly summary #71

Are you free on Wednesday? Join us at the Wikimedia DC WikiSalon!

Wikimedia DC invites you to join us for our next DC WikiSalon, which will be held on the evening of Wednesday, August 24 at our K Street office.

The WikiSalon an informal gathering of Wikimedia enthusiasts, who come together to discuss the Wikimedia projects and collaboratively edit. There's no set agenda, and guests are welcome to recommend articles for the group to edit or edit on their own. Light refreshments will be provided.

We look forward to seeing you there! Kirill [talk] 11:25, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

STiki emergency

Wikidata weekly summary #72

Meet up with local Wikipedians on September 14!

Are you free on Saturday, September 14? If so, please join Wikimedia DC and local Wikipedians for a social meetup and dinner at Vapiano (near Farragut North/Farragut West) at 6:00 PM. All Wikipedia/Wikimedia and free knowledge/culture enthusiasts, regardless of editing experience, are welcome to attend! All ages are welcome!

For more information and to sign up, please visit the meetup page. Hope to see you there! Kirill [talk] 18:42, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

19:49, 25 August 2013 (UTC)