May 2025

edit

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Talk:Jean-Paul Gut. Donnermar2 (talk) 06:23, 22 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

The proposed changes are fully sourced, by undisputed respected international media. Please, argument in talk page for any specific issue. Alceste sur son yacht (talk) 06:27, 22 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Notice of noticeboard discussion

edit

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Donnermar2 (talk) 06:45, 22 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Donnermar2: You opened it without merit, therefore I will appreciate that you now ask that this request be removed.
I will also appreciate that you comply with the suggestion left by one of the reviewers, @Knitsey, here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=1291630589, to strike the unfair level 4 warning you left above on my talk page.
I will take both, your cancellation and call for removal at ANI, for a fair apology.
Thank you --Alceste sur son yacht (talk) 18:12, 26 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nicolas Lerner (June 27)

edit
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cactusisme was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
A lot of the sources r from the same website.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 08:50, 27 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
Teahouse logo
Hello, Alceste sur son yacht! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 08:50, 27 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nicolas Lerner has been accepted

edit
Nicolas Lerner, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MCE89 (talk) 13:53, 27 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
@MCE89:Thank you! Have a good day! Cheers, Alceste sur son yacht (talk) 14:00, 27 June 2025 (UTC)Reply