Aat3cr

June 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Richlands, Virginia appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. SheepNotGoats (talk) 19:57, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

These are the facts as I see it. The neutral point of view is determined by the reader not by someone like you that decides for the masses. This is a FREE country and the people can make up their own mind and All I can say is butt out. I will keep this on as long as I'm able. You cannot censor free information. So step off. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aat3cr (talk • contribs) 03:29, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Richlands, Virginia, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. All information added to Wikipedia has to be verifiable by reliable sources. That's just the way it works here. If you have any questions on how to add appropriate information, or just about the policies in general, just let me know. SheepNotGoats (talk) 19:18, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. TNXMan 19:16, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dumsheepgoat for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. —Duncan^{What I Do} / _{What I Say} 00:44, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

I'm am sorry for what I've done. I will not happen again. Aat3cr (talk) 18:38, 10 June 2010 (UTC) AAT3CR

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aat3cr (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

I'm wont edit this site again. I've been angery at the town because they won't help me and I feel trapped. I realize this isn't the place for my battles with them.

Decline reason:

If you won't edit this site again there is no reason to unblock you, since that would only restore your ability to edit. Besides, your past edits, sockpuppeting and unblock request leave me unconvinced that this block is no longer required to prevent future damage. Excirial ^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 16:23, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I understand your decision.