I believe Wikipedia should have split articles based on a users political view which would have these three options (Left, Center, and Right), this is so then users of Wikipedia don't feel alienated by the current political bias of the Website. Also the Wikipedia website will have more traffic from different political views which may earn the Wikimedia company more money from those of Right Wing and Center political views.— Preceding unsigned comment added by ALucas89 (talk • contribs) 01:16, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
- Please understand that maintaining a neutral point of view in all Wikipedia articles is a non-negotiable policy. All viewpoints that have significant coverage in reliable sources should receive due weight in Wikipedia articles. If you find an article that you believe does not provide due weight to a viewpoint that has significant coverage in reliable sources, then raise the issue on the article's talk page, providing citations to reliable sources that support that viewpoint. - Donald Albury 16:46, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
November 2025
edit
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Auferstanden aus Ruinen, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Sumanuil. (talk to me) 02:34, 21 November 2025 (UTC)
Introduction to contentious topics
edit
You have recently edited a page related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.