You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Akilah Hughes. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Springee (talk) 14:54, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Isn’t Springee the one engaging in an edit war by reverting my edit more than 3 times? 69.126.152.175 (talk) 19:14, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- If you don't self revert you will be taken to the 3RR noticeboard and likely blocked. Springee (talk) 23:19, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- I will comply then with 3RR and avoid making more than 3 consecutive reverts in a 24-hour period. Thank you for clarifying this rule. 69.126.152.175 (talk) 23:49, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- If you don't self revert you will be taken to the 3RR noticeboard and likely blocked. Springee (talk) 23:19, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Please cease leaving comments which are WP:BLP violations like you did at Talk:StoneToss. Doing so may result in you being blocked. TarnishedPathtalk 14:56, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- I’m asking why StoneToss, the literal Nazi whose real name is (Redacted), isn’t identified under his real and publicly known identity on the Talk page like I’m supposed to, instead of directly editing the article. You’re deleting my question instead of answering it. 69.126.152.175 (talk) 15:03, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- Your question is answered by the FAQ on the page, but to reiterate: the supposed revelation of StoneToss' identity by some internet activists earlier this year has not been supported by any credible reliable sources. Some have covered the incident and been careful to report the supposed identity as an allegation made by the activists, not as a verifiable fact. Since this information cannot be verified, Wikipedia does not report it. Our biographies of living persons policy requires that any contentious information about any living person written on any page on Wikipedia (not just articles) must be supported by an inline citation to a reliable source or it must be removed immediately, and editors who persistently add unsourced contentious information about living persons must be blocked from editing.
- If you think that better reliable sources have been published since this was last reviewed which now properly verify StoneToss' real identity, as actual fact and not just rehashing the earlier allegations with no further support, you're welcome to discuss on the article's talk page. Before you do I suggest you have a look at past discussions in the talk page's archives: editors turning up to talk pages just to inflame past discussions for no reason are often viewed as disruptive. We expect you to be working towards improving the article, not just settling a score or righting a great wrong. Thank you. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 19:29, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- I didn’t realize the current evidence of StoneToss being (Redacted) was considered unsatisfactory, so I guess I’ll wait for more information to emerge. This post requires no response. 69.126.152.175 (talk) 18:29, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
