August 2024

edit
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the Russo-Ukrainian War. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 14:42, 15 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

DYK advice

edit

Hi, I see Thomas Bouchier was your first nomination. When I start an article, which I might want to nominate for DYK, I start with a draft or userspace page, and only publish when I think it is ready for DYK and I have thought of a hook. I use the DYK check tool or the page size gadget to check the article is long enough, ideally with some leeway, in case a few words get removed or the reviewer thinks it is still a stub.

Obviously you will find what works for you, rather than what works for me. As you may have noticed, DYK is now in backlog mode (WP:DYKUBM), where experienced nominators are doing extra reviews, so hopefully your nomination will be reviewed fairly soon.

I try to keep an eye on the nomination and later the prep and queue the until the hook gets to main page. There can be last minute queries, hopefully in that case you would be pinged. TSventon (talk) 15:13, 4 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

DNB

edit

Just so you know, the Dictionary of National Biography is usually considered a sufficient source on its own. The DNB is the main reason why the WP:GNG says "There is no fixed number of sources required" and that "multiple sources are generally expected" – "generally", aka "not always". WhatamIdoing (talk) 04:12, 7 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Fair enough. Presuming this is about John Martin, I certainly was a bit hasty and/or sloppy in how I went about it. Thanks for the heads up. Nivlac, 1st Viscountess Nivlac (talk) 08:33, 7 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
You're welcome. It'd help everyone if we wrote down some of these unwritten rules, but some things are surprisingly difficult. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ WhatamIdoing (talk) 19:34, 7 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
The bit about the DNB is written down at Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Additional criteria. If anything, there is so much guidance that hardly anyone is going to read it all. TSventon (talk) 21:34, 7 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
Huh, well what do you know. I still think the complete lack of actual biographical detail on Martin (I should go add what seems to be the second fact about him, that he went to the University of Edinburgh, to his article) means he can’t possibly be notable, but if that’s the policy then the card says moops. Nivlac, 1st Viscountess Nivlac (talk) 21:44, 7 June 2026 (UTC)Reply