User:Whirlwind24/Biomedical waste

Biomedical waste or hospital waste is any kind of waste containing infectious (or potentially infectious) materials generated during the treatment of humans or animals as well as during research involving biologics. It may also include waste associated with the generation of biomedical waste that visually appears to be of medical or laboratory origin (e.g. packaging, unused bandages, infusion kits etc.), as well research laboratory waste containing biomolecules or organisms that are mainly restricted from environmental release. As detailed below, discarded sharps are considered biomedical waste whether they are contaminated or not, due to the possibility of being contaminated with blood and their propensity to cause injury when not properly contained and disposed. Biomedical waste is a type of biowaste.

Biomedical waste may be solid or liquid. Examples of infectious waste include discarded blood, sharps, unwanted microbiological cultures and stocks, identifiable body parts (including those as a result of amputation), other human or animal tissue, used bandages and dressings, discarded gloves, other medical supplies that may have been in contact with blood and body fluids, and laboratory waste that exhibits the characteristics described above. Waste sharps include potentially contaminated used (and unused discarded) needles, scalpels, lancets and other devices capable of penetrating skin.

Biomedical waste is generated from biological and medical sources and activities, such as the diagnosis, prevention, or treatment of diseases. Common generators (or producers) of biomedical waste include hospitals, health clinics, nursing homes, emergency medical services, medical research laboratories, offices of physicians, dentists, veterinarians, home health care and morgues or funeral homes. In healthcare facilities (i.e. hospitals, clinics, doctor's offices, veterinary hospitals and clinical laboratories), waste with these characteristics may alternatively be called medical or clinical waste. Within [1]healthcare facilities, operating rooms generate the most waste, creating a hazardous and polluted environment.

Biomedical waste is distinct from normal trash or general waste, and differs from other types of hazardous waste, such as chemical, radioactive, universal or industrial waste. Medical facilities generate waste hazardous chemicals and radioactive materials. While such wastes are normally not infectious, they require proper disposal. Some wastes are considered multihazardous, such as tissue samples preserved in formalin.

Effects on humans

edit

Disposal of this waste is an environmental concern, as many medical wastes are classified as infectious or biohazardous and could potentially lead to the spread of infectious disease. The most common danger for humans is the infection which also affects other living organisms in the region. Daily exposure to the wastes (landfills) leads to accumulation of harmful substances or microbes in the person's body. Exposure has increased significantly as the healthcare industry contributes 5.5% of the total national carbon footprint.

A 1990 report by the United States Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry concluded that the general public is not likely to be adversely affected by biomedical waste generated in the traditional healthcare setting. They found, however, that biomedical waste from those settings may pose an injury and exposure risks via occupational contact with medical waste for doctors, nurses, and janitorial, laundry and refuse workers. Further, there are opportunities for the general public to come into contact with medical waste, such as needles used illicitly outside healthcare settings, or biomedical waste generated via home health care.

Other possible solutions

edit

Significant strides may be made relatively quickly if the focus shifts towards surgical subspecialties and their involvement in generated medical waste. Surgical specialties in particular have focused on infection control and thus have implemented single-use operative tools in their practices. One example of this can be seen within the practice of gastroenterology, where each endoscopy alone in the U.S. generates approximately 2.1 kg of disposable waste, of which 64% of the waste ended up in landfills. Thankfully, it appears that surgeons across the U.S. have agreed that their practice generates a high amount of waste and that a change needs to be implemented. A multi-center survey of 219 U.S. surgeons showed that 90% of them agreed strongly that waste of sterile surgical items is an issue and moreover, 95% of them agreed to a willingness to change their operating room workflow to reduce waste. Another focus that proves to be effective is reform around the policies that surround "red bag waste." Separation of medical waste is typically done via these bags and a narrative review out of U.S. operating rooms found that 90% of red bag waste, or the items found in the red waste bags, did not actually meet the criteria for pathologic or infectious waste. Recycling [2]is another way to separate medical waste. While not a significant contributor to eliminating medical waste, recycling can still limit disposal costs by around 3%.

Initiative from corporations and hospitals is essential to creating a healthier environment, however, there are various methods in which involves action from the general population and would contribute to a clean air environment. By creating surveillance groups within hospitals, everyone would be held accountable for misconduct and improper disposal of waste. Consequences could be implemented where individuals would be required to pay a fine, or face unpaid suspension from work. Companies and governmental organization should also initiate non-routine checkups and searches, this would place pressure on hospitals to ensure that waste is properly disposed all year round. Voluntary clean-ups would involve hospital staff in assuring that medical waste is not littered around the hospital or thrown into regular garbage bins.

Because hospitals, specifically operating rooms, generate the most medical waste in the healthcare industry, it is crucial for them to work towards developing sustainable initiatives. Items used in the operating room that cannot be reused in subsequent surgeries can be repurposed[3] through donations to the community. For example, plastic trays and surgical gowns can be given to art classes, towels to cleaning initiatives, and foam packing to moving companies.

Management

edit

Biomedical waste must be properly managed and disposed of to protect the environment, general public and workers, especially healthcare and sanitation workers who are at risk of exposure to biomedical waste as an occupational hazard. Steps in the management of biomedical waste include generation, accumulation, handling, storage, treatment, transport and disposal.

The development and implementation of a national waste management policy can improve biomedical waste management in health facilities in a country.

Operating Rooms

Operating [4]rooms (ORs) generates around one-third of waste in a hospital. This[2] waste includes but is not limited to biohazards, plastic materials, pharmaceuticals, and linens. Moreover, ORs require large amounts of energy, causing a further negative environmental impact. This is why managing waste generated in ORs is crucial to minimizing overall biomedical waste production. To[5] reduce waste and cost of disposal, recycling and properly labeling waste are imperative. Reusing and [3]repurposing products like gowns and instruments also limits costs and waste. Moreover, streamlining[5] surgical trays and packaging of instruments also promotes waste reduction. Energy[2] saving methods in areas like HVAC systems and anesthesia must also be implemented to promote a "greener" healthcare industry.

References

edit

31. Bae, Julia H, et al. “The ‘6th R’ of sustainability: Repurposing operating room waste for community benefit.” The American Journal of Surgery, vol. 238, Elsevier, 2024, 115930.

32. de Ridder, Else F, et al. "A New Method to Improve the Environmental Sustainability of the Operating Room: Healthcare Sustainability Mode and Effect Analysis (HSMEA)." Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 21, ProQuest, 2022, pp. 13957.

33. Harding, Charlotte. “Design Opportunities to Reduce Waste in Operating Rooms.” Towards Circular Economy: Evaluation of Waste Treatment, vol. 13, no. 4, Sustainability, 2021, 2207.

Article Draft

edit

Lead

edit

Article body

edit

References

edit
  1. de Ridder, Else F.; Friedericy, Herman J.; van der Eijk, Anne C.; Dankelman, Jenny; Jansen, Frank Willem (2022-10-27). "A New Method to Improve the Environmental Sustainability of the Operating Room: Healthcare Sustainability Mode and Effect Analysis (HSMEA)". Sustainability. 14 (21): 13957. doi:10.3390/su142113957. ISSN 2071-1050.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: article number as page number (link) CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
  2. 1 2 3 Mulier, Harold; Rex, Steffen; Teunkens, An (2024-12). "Greening the operating room: A narrative review of existing initiatives and future opportunities in anaesthesia". Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology. 38 (4): 372–378. doi:10.1016/j.bpa.2025.04.003. ISSN 1521-6896. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  3. 1 2 Bae, Julia H.; Ravinal, Lisa; Barth, Ellen; Yanda, Melissa; Bae, Donald S.; Arato, Gabriel; Lewandowski, Katherine (2024-12). "The "6th R" of sustainability: Repurposing operating room waste for community benefit". The American Journal of Surgery. 238: 115930. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.115930. ISSN 0002-9610. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)CS1 maint: article number as page number (link)
  4. Harding, Charlotte; Van Loon, Joren; Moons, Ingrid; De Win, Gunter; Du Bois, Els (2021-02-18). "Design Opportunities to Reduce Waste in Operating Rooms". Sustainability. 13 (4): 2207. doi:10.3390/su13042207. ISSN 2071-1050.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
  5. 1 2 Wu, Samantha; Cerceo, Elizabeth (2021-10). "Sustainability Initiatives in the Operating Room". The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety. 47 (10): 663–672. doi:10.1016/j.jcjq.2021.06.010. ISSN 1553-7250. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)