User:WaterBottleTable/Indigenous planning

Principles

edit

Instead of regulating private land use, as western planning does, indigenous communities see land as a birthright that belongs to everyone, passed down through generations. Because of this belief, keeping the lands productivity stable for the next generation is a large component of Indigenous planning.[1] Also in line with this belief, and a unique aspect of indigenous planning, are the countless indigenous technologies that work to foster a positive human relationship with the environment, as well as ensure present and future human symbiosis with nature.[2]

In the United States in 1995, a grassroots movement with the ideals of the new theory of indigenous planning established 5 basic principles of indigenous planning.[1] The principles established are; people thrive in community, ordinary people have all the answers, people have a basic right to determine their own future, oppression continues to be a force that devastates people, and the people are beautiful, already. [1]

History

edit

Indigenous planning emerged as a planning culture and field of practice during the mid-20th century within the context of modern planning and imperialism, however, Indigenous groups have been planning their own urban spaces for as long as they have existed. [changed - and imperialism -and the rest of the sentence]

While Indigenous community planning is historically based upon managing interactions with the natural world, it now also focuses on interactions with non-Indigenous actors as well. In the political sense, this means fighting for and receiving legitimization and empowerment in leadership positions that were stripped from them through colonization.[1]

Examples of Specific Indigenous Peoples by Continent

edit

Africa

edit

see also: Urban Planning in Africa

The Edo People (also called the Benin People)

edit

The city of Benin has been thriving since before it was ransacked by a british punitive raid in 1897. Before the raid, the city was ordered according to family groupings. The city nonetheless survived and is home to more than a million people today.

Asia

edit

The Lao People

edit

Laos' Northern Provinces relies on the economic activity of swidden farming and raising livestock, which due to many complicated factors, is currently not sustainable and causing periods of food insecurity and lack of economic funds.[3] To alleviate these problems and prevent future worsening of the problem, the Northern Region Sustainable Livelihoods Development Project uses "participatory livestock development," which will in turn help the surrounding ecosystems.[3]

North America

edit

The Syilx People

edit

The En'owkinwixw process is a traditional method of facilitating "collective learning and community decision-making" used by Syilx communities in Okanagan, British Columbia. The CCP for the Penticton Indian Band is an example of the En'owkinwixw process in action. The process emphasizes inclusion and equal voice in community consultation to create a common guiding framework that is culturally relevant.

The Oneida Nation

edit

In the 1995 American Planning Association's Chicago conference, indigenous planning emerged in academic planning circles, largely pushed by the people of the Oneida Nation.[4] The conference resulted in the Indigenous Planning Network (IPN), a division in the American Planning Association.[4]

The Blackfeet Nation

edit

Mark Magee, a planner for the Blackfeet Nation (or Amskapi Pikani), describes the difficulties that arise from jurisdictional issues, a common theme in indigenous planning.[5] Policies from the federal, state, and county levels often conflict with indigenous ideals, which can be hard to overcome. Currently, the planners are working on a project to bring bison back to their land, to restore both the ecosystem, and their old cultural way of life that includes bison.[6] There is also a land buy-back program aimed at returning private, non-native owned lands to the Blackfeet Nation, which was successful in regaining 324 thousand acres of land.[5]

Oceania

edit

Indigenous Australians

edit

In Australia, land councils are regional organizations representing Indigenous Australians. While the primary function is to advocate for traditional land rights, the work of many land councils extends to community development plans and programs, which focus on the economic, social and cultural well-being of Indigenous Australians.

The Maori People

edit

The Maori in New Zealand practice Iwi Management Planning, which provides a framework for tribes to define their past and present, and prescribe "management, planning and decision-making processes to guide iwi toward their concept of self-determination". Iwi management planning and its associated policies and approaches are examples of indigenous planning done by and for Maori communities. Furthermore, Maori iwi management planning is a planning tradition that has a history that predates colonization and any ensuing acts or treaties. Contemporary Maori planning practiced today can be seen as a "dual planning tradition" where the nature of planning in the context of colonization continues to evolve while remaining grounded in Maori tradition and philosophy.

Native Hawaiians

edit

In Hawai'i there is a trend towards the traditional Ahupuaʻa concept of land management, particularly with watershed planning.

South America

edit

The Kamëntšá Biyá People

edit

In 2010, the Kamëntšá won the rights to their land, which lies in the Sibundoy Valley of present day Colombia.[7] After this preliminary step that came after decades of disposition by colonialism, they legally regained 20% of their ancestral lands.[7] Their land use visions center primarily around the cosmos and public health, two very important aspects of their culture.[7] In order to protect those interests, protection of watersheds and ecosystems with traditional medicinal plants are high on the people's' priority list.[7]

  1. 1 2 3 4 Jojola, Ted (2005). "Student Disorientation - your how-to guide for a progressive planning education" (PDF). Planners Network. Retrieved 12/6/21. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |access-date= (help)CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  2. WATSON, Julia; ROBERTSON, Avery; DE ROSEN, Félix (2020). "DESIGNING BY RADICAL INDIGENISM". Landscape Architecture Frontiers. 8 (3): 148. doi:10.15302/j-laf-1-050019. ISSN 2095-5405.
  3. 1 2 Government of Lao People’s Democratic Republic for the Asian Development Bank (ADB). (2006). "Lao People's Democratic Republic: Northern Region Sustainable Livelihoods Development Project" (PDF). Retrieved 12/06/21. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |access-date= (help); line feed character in |title= at position 50 (help)CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  4. 1 2 Administrator. "Indigenous Planning and Tribal Community Development – Planners Network". Retrieved 2021-12-06.
  5. 1 2 "Indigenous Planning Network - Native Land Project | Montana State University". www.montana.edu. Retrieved 2021-12-06.
  6. "GrazingResolutionReviewProcess.pdf". Google Docs. Retrieved 2021-12-06.
  7. 1 2 3 4 "The Kamëntšá Biyá: Land Use Planning in Defense of the Sacred". The Esperanza Project. 2021-10-27. Retrieved 2021-12-06.