I have been unable to access this page as a logged in editor for months. I've replaced it w/ Tad Slamp, but I've done little w/ my Tad Slamp page. I may import this page to it. Those above me in rank wishing to erase it, have my permission. I have lost my password and my ability to get my password sent (I must add the qualifier "somehow" to the latter).
To create an access panel to the same watchlist page elsewhere, copy and paste the following code: {{public watchlist|Wikipedia:WikiProject_Scientology/publicwatchlist}}
Just to let all know: I am often @ a machine/station that has quite limmited access. Most strikingly I cannot access email or whole web search engines from these stations of which Iwrite. If I fail to provide references (wikipedia: references) @ times such is a main reason I ask for your leniance/patience.--Thaddeus Slamp 22:23, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
I want to thank all who came to bat on either my behalf Hulses behalf, or against user: OverlordQ on the David Allen Hulse entry. I'll do some cleaning mysself, and I hope it gets placed and truly think it deserves so.
All right, here is the user page by for and about user Thaddeus Slamp.
Brief note 2: I think I've found a way around my web access problem discussed above, except that I still have no email access from the stations I had none from before. So the news is I shall hopefully be better @ providing documentation of claims I make, soon (my solution is:http://www.archive.org/web/web.php , and it's the only solution I have, thus far).
Brief note 3:Tho I am listed @ Slarty@rock.com, I have another adress I would much prefer to receive email @ (and I definitely welcome all email other than the entirely frivolouse). It is this: Thaddeus.Slamp@gmail.com
Brief note 4: (w/regard to my editing): I am only surprised slightly by lack of feedback, becouse I do so much thats horrible, and so much thats great, that I just recon they ballance eachother out.
This user needs more userboxes. MORE, I tell you, more!!! Muhahaha!
-xen
This user believes that userbox should always be pluralised userboxen, and thinks that this is one of the most important and exciting issues of our time.
"It is awfully hard to be b-b-brave, when you are a very small user."
This alleged user can be said to maintain an ill-defined policy or other custom of neutrality or other ambiguity-related quality on some or all issues that may be potentially controversial to some alleged people.
.svg){kind=small}
.gif){kind=small}
