A fact from the article Diamond Lights, which this user created or significantly contributed to, was featured in the Did you know... section on the Main Page.
This editor is a Grand Tutnum and is entitled to display this Book of Knowledge with Coffee Cup Stain.
Taking part in AFDs - more people should do this! It exposes you to different usages and interpretations of Wikipedia's policies. Plus, getting a wide consensus is always good.
Creating redirects and disambigs on occasion.
Trying to keep on top of the mound of anonymous editors who treat pro-wrestling articles as fan forums.
Articles
Articles have adopted and expanded: (none of them are amazing but are a lot better than they were)
List of UNICEF Goodwill Ambassadors <--- spent bloody ages re-writing and sourcing this list, which had become full of vandalism, outdated info, inconsistencies and untruths
Someone who has never heard of ham: from this to this to this , this and finally this !
My Favourite Personal Attack Against Myself
"I really pity the block who asked you to marry him, your first answer would be can you provide a relible source for your information."
(My fiancée has a reliable source for her information: ME!)
Facepalm section
Some random hoaxes I've removed, how long they were in mainspace for:
News and notes: Offline: Osama Khalid still in prison He has been imprisoned since 2020 for his Wikipedia edits. A fresh campaign is calling for his release.
Recent research: WikiLambda the Ultimate Does Abstract Wikipedia help fight "One ring to rule them all" solutions for knowledge access - or does it implement one itself?
.svg){kind=small}
