User:RandomWriter4/sandbox

Moral Self-Awareness Theory

Moral self-awareness (MSA) is an individual’s ability to recognise, reflect upon, and evaluate their own moral values, beliefs, and behaviours . It has important applications in business ethics and could be enhanced to increase global social welfare.

MSA, a sociocognitive aspect of psychology, is shaped by external influences for example from parents, and peers. It plays a central role in shaping an individual’s understanding of right and wrong, and requires a deep understanding of one's ethical beliefs and an ongoing evaluation of how moral behaviour aligns with them. Moral emotions, such as shame, guilt, and pride, are evident from a young age and aid the development of MSA by causing individuals to reflect on immoral behaviour, building into a "moral self" and moral identity. In applied settings, MSA serves as an alternative to economic self-interest, offering potential benefits in areas such as business ethics, social welfare, and the promotion of pro-environmental behaviours. Drawing on classic theories, contemporary literature and the work of Thompson, this article explores the influence of moral identity, social influences and moral emotions, as well as the challenges of researching MSA and areas of future research necessary to progress the field.

MSA should not be confused with moral development. MSA is an ongoing reflective journey, enabled by the framework established by moral development, and hence will be referred to as early or later MSA.

Theoretical foundations

Early Psychological Theories

Sigmund Freud introduced the idea of moral emotions balancing one's actions, internal conflicts and moral oughts.

Freud's psychoanalytic theory introduced the superego, the internalised moral conscience formed through socialization, and the role of guilt and shame in balancing moral conflicts. Kohlberg's theory suggested developed morals are guided by abstract principles and values, focused on justice and individual rights. This suggests a reflective component of morality, with an element of choice and self-awareness. Gilligan built on this and introduced her theory of the Ethics of Care which emphasised the importance of relationships and emotion in moral decision-making. These early theories provide foundational understanding which has been built on by modern researchers.

Social Psychology

Moral identity was introduced as a framework by Colby and Damon, for understanding how individuals perceive themselves as moral actors . This emphasized the importance of understanding moral self-concept when considering moral behaviour, framing morality as part of an individual's self-identity, and integrating self-awareness with social and psychological processes. MSA was later defined by Thompson in 2020, who outlined the roles of moral identity, social influence and moral emotions across childhood.

Development of Moral Self-Awareness

Moral Self and Moral Identity

The moral self, as described by Thompson , aids understanding of the emergence of later MSA by considering children's early self-perception as moral actors. Though challenging to study, an established interview procedure enables children, from age 3.5, to report meaningful data on their internal characteristics. Koshanka found, using this interview, that children aged 5 can self-report having moral intentions such as aiming to "do the right thing" . While 5-year-old's limited language may influence results, these findings were internally consistent across 74 partcicpants. This therefore provides robust evidence that at age 5 children are aware of morals as an important part of their self. This may aid early MSA due to the ability to draw on personal morals. This finding was supported by a follow-up longitudinal study which found that higher moral awareness leads to more moral behaviours in later life which increases the predictive validity of the notion towards later MSA and its ecological validity.

Throughout middle childhood, the moral self becomes increasingly oriented around efforts to act morally in domains which are important to the individual e.g. loyalty to friends, and evolves into the moral identity . This is the extent to which being "a person with strong morals" is important in an individual's self-concept . An understanding of this is key to later MSA, as a strong moral identity enhances the ability to reflect on discrepancies in moral behaviour. However, there is no longitudinal evidence linking the linear progression from the moral self to moral identity. The notion has been further challenged due to the significant cognitive jump needed to progress from a basic moral self-concept to a reflective understanding of the self, and integration of complex moral principles. One possible explanation is that learning may aid this process, by linking the moral self to a values system this promotes a gradual increase in the complexity of moral thought towards moral identity and later MSA.

Social Influences

Thompson suggests that parents have a central role in establishing this moral value system, especially by confronting children about the distress they have caused to another, as this links moral behaviour to emotion and consequence. Classic theories, such as Kohlberg’s Preconventional Stage , support the importance of parental discipline and suggest that morals develop as a mechanism to avoid punishment and gain rewards from parents. Whilst this explains the link between discipline and morals suggested by Thompson, this may lead to surface-level acceptance, rather than deep understanding, which is necessary for MSA. Hence, this theory may be outdated, with modern research considering the influence of parents' own behaviour. A 2024 study outlined that children developed stronger moral understanding when parents acted as role models and explained the moral reasoning behind these behaviours. This outlines a clear link between parental influence and moral awareness through social learning.

Kohlberg's model of moral development stages , with examples.

Across later childhood and adolescence, parents remain highly influential. A recent literature review found that adolescents in families with high communication are more likely to internalise parental moral values, with strong convergent validity of the findings. However, Matsuba highlights the importance of adolescents acting on their moral values, for example by interacting with their peers. This is because opportunities to strive for consistency between actions and values strengthen this key element of MSA. Kohlberg's Conventional stage explains that as adolescents begin to seek approval from peers and face moral dilemmas together, they provide frameworks for mutual negotiation to deepen understanding and reflect on morals, independently from parents. Hence the role of peer influence has been supported across recent literature and classic theory, giving robust evidence of its importance in enhancing MSA.

Peer influence however may not be solely important during adolescence as previously suggested. Thompson highlights that an important advancement in early MSA comes from children enforcing normative rules with others. A study found that 3-year-olds enforce rules with ingroup members rather than outgroup members, but enforce moral norms with both groups equally . This has been supported by Yucel and Vaish's recent experimental study, which found that 3-year-old children "tattle" on others about moral violations . This gives further evidence that, contrary to classic theories, children act on their moral values with peers at a young age, which, building on Matsuba's theory, will help enhance early MSA through practising moral judgements. However, Yucel and Vaish suggested that shy temperament may mediate whether children enforce moral norms. This highlights the need to consider personality traits when examining early MSA and issues with using behavioural indicators to measure MSA.

Moral Emotions - Guilt, Shame and Pride

While social influences shapes the moral framework, moral emotions serve as internal mechanisms driving reflection and awareness. Guilt, shame and pride are moral emotions which signal violation or accordance with morals, triggering reflection on behaviour, and hence are vital to the development of MSA . Guilt is a dismay response to negative consequences of one's actions. Shame highlights the reflection of what an immoral act portrays about yourself. Pride, on the other hand, emerges from acting in alignment with morals or achieving goals attributed to personal effort. Moral emotions develop around 18-24 months and are linked to self-esteem which supports the moral reflection essential to MSA.

Guilt and shame have been observed in lab experiments with differences in children's responses to experimentally manipulated damages. While this negative arousal from a violation of morals has been predicted to trigger self-reflection, empirical research linking pride, guilt and shame directly to MSA development remains limited. This means that the exact mechanism of influence is unknown and more research is needed before applying this explanation. Further, this research into moral emotions is now relatively outdated. A contemporary study found that there was a relationship between parenting styles and moral emotion, for example, love withdrawal techniques negatively predicted "guilt-proneness" . This new finding suggests that moral emotions may provide key insights into understanding how parental influence leads to MSA, which was previously unclear. While these correlational findings enable new explanations, more empirical evidence is required before causation can be confidently assumed.

Critiques and Controversies

Much of the research in this field has been conducted on Americans, or other Westernised samples, who value individualism. This means generalisations of MSA theory to other cultures may be inappropriate especially as culture, upbringing, and personal experience are central to the formation of an individual's moral beliefs . Research into Chinese cultures found that they enhance shame to reduce unfavourable behaviours more than other cultures. Based on the research outlined above this could be used to predict that Chinese individuals will have higher MSA. If this was true, MSA theory may have a good ability to explain cultural differences in MSA, but no research has considered this link. Hence the cross-cultural validity of the theory is currently unknown.

Secondly, MSA is an internal process and hence is difficult to reliably measure. Many studies rely on behavioural observation, or self-reported introspection, both of which have been found to have poor validity. Behavioural indicators such as those looking at guilt and shame and observations are found to be poor at discriminating between emotions which means research into them may not truly measure what they intended. Further, there is a research consensus that due to humans having poor insights into our cognitive processes, self-report has poor validity and may rely on post-hoc rationalisations rather than true introspection , and is likely to suffer from social desirability bias . The cumulation of these issues in methodology renders research into MSA extremely difficult as issues with validity and reliability affect the scientific rigor of evidence.

Practical Implications

Despite these critiques, understanding MSA remains crucial for addressing real-world issues such as increasing social welfare, which has been suggested to be minimised by the financial focus of businesses. Many studies suggest enhancing MSA in business schools to redefine professional success beyond financial gain, crowding in ethical practice to make it the dominant business culture, as higher MSA in leaders results in them being more flexible, open to new ideas and aware of their ethical impact . MSA can further be enhanced by techniques to make people aware of when their actions misalign with morals to encourage environmentally conscious behaviour, which may be pivotal in reducing climate change, as historically people's actions have not aligned with their promises. This highlights the important real-life applications of MSA.

Future Directions

Throughout this article, it is clear there are many areas of MSA which need further research due to the recency of the field's development, this provides opportunities for a multitude of studies. Future research into MSA theory should consider cross-cultural research, filling the gap of studies in collectivist cultures, to better understand the universality of this theory. These studies should consider using a more triangulated methodology, rather than focusing on behavioural observations and self-report, which, as discussed above, offer limited understanding. They should consider using implicit measures or incorporating physiological measures to complement existing approaches, or longitudinal studies to explore the connection between early moral development, moral emotions and later MSA.

Additionally, whilst social influences are at the forefront of MSA development as we understand it, empirical research into the cognitive and neurological basis of MSA could benefit the field by offering an alternative approach to understanding. For example, the posterior/inferior praecuneus and neighbouring retro splenial cingulate have been suggested to be implicated in self-awareness , but little research has been done considering MSA. Better practical understanding combining social, cognitive and neuroscientific perspectives would foster more informed educational programs to increase social welfare.

References

References

[1] Lapsley, D; Narvaez, D (2004). Moral development, self, and identity". Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

[2] Mamanazarov, U (2023). The content of the concept of moral self-awareness. Scholar, 1(30), 16–20. ISSN 2181-4147.

[3] Friedland, Julian; Jain, Tanusree (2022). Reframing the purpose of business education: Crowding-in a culture of moral self-awareness. Journal of Management Inquiry,  31(1), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492620940793. ISSN 1056-4926.

[4] Friedland, Julian; Balkin, David B. (2023). When gig workers become essential: Leveraging customer moral self-awareness beyond COVID-19. Business Horizons, 66 (2), 181–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2022.05.003.

[5] Thompson, R (2020). The development of moral self-awareness. In Jensen (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of moral development: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 71–91). Oxford University Press.

[6] Friedland, Julian; Cole, Benjamin M. (2019). From homo-economicus to homo-virtus: A system-theoretic model for raising moral self-awareness. Journal of Business Ethics, 155 (1), 191–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3494-6. ISSN 1573-0697.

[7]  Tłokiński, Waldemar; Olszewski, Henryk; Olech, Michał (2023). The semantics of remorse for the climate crisis: Moral self-awareness and its educational role. Sustainability, 15 (19), 14145. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151914145. ISSN 2071-1050.

[8] Freud, Sigmund (1923). The ego and the Id. The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud. Vol. 19. pp. 1–66.

[9] Kohlberg, L (1981). The philosophy of moral development: Moral stages and the idea of justice. Harper and Row.

[10] Gilligan, Carol (1982). The contribution of women's thought to developmental theory: The elimination of sex bias in moral development research and education. ERIC.

[11] Colby, A; Damon, W (1999). The development of extraordinary moral commitment.  In Killen (Ed.), Morality in everyday life: Developmental perspectives (1st ed., p. 362). Cambridge Univ. Press ISBN 978-0-521-66586-5.

[12] Aquino, Karl; Reed, Americus (2002). The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83 (6), 1423–1440. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.6.1423. ISSN 1939-1315.

[13] Eder, R (1990). Uncovering young children's psychological selves: Individual and developmental difference. Child development, (61), 849–862.

[14] Koshanska, G (2002). Committed compliance, moral self, and internalisation: A mediational model. Developmental Psychology, (38), 339–351.

[15] Kochanska, Grazyna; Koenig, Jamie L.; Barry, Robin A.; Kim, Sanghag; Yoon, Jeung Eun (2010). Children's conscience during toddler and preschool years, moral self, and a competent, adaptive developmental trajectory. Developmental Psychology, 46(5), 1320–1332. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020381. ISSN 1939-0599.

[16] Thompson, R (2012). Wither the preconventional child? Toward a life-span moral development theory. Child Development Perspectives, 6,423–429.

[17] Kingsford, Jess M.; Hawes, David J.; de Rosnay, Marc (2018). The moral self and moral identity: Developmental questions and conceptual challenges. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 36 (4), 652–666. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.12260.

[18] Hendra; Khozin; Irwan; Anwar (2024). Parent's contribution to strengthening moral awareness of student religiosity behaviour. Al-Hayat: Journal of Islamic Education, 8 (1), 175–184. https://doi.org/10.35723/ajie.v8i1.392. ISSN 2599-3046.

[19] Hou, Meibaohong (2023). The impact of parents on adolescent moral development. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 8, 1177–1182. https://doi.org/10.54097/ehss.v8i.4447. ISSN 2771-2907.

[20] Matsuba, K; Murzyn, T; Hart, D (2013). Moral Identity Development and Community. Handbook of Moral Development. ISBN 978-0-203-58195-7.

[21] Schmidt, M.; Rakoczy, H; Tomasello, M (2012). Young children enforce social norms selectively depending on the violator's group affiliation. Cognition, 124 (3), 325–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.06.004. ISSN 0010-0277.

[22] Yucel, Meltem; Vaish, Amrisha (2018). Young children tattle to enforce moral norms. Social Development, 27 (4), 924–936. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12290. ISSN 1467-9507.

[23] Tracy, Jessica L.; Robins, Richard W. (2007). The psychological structure of pride: A tale of two facets. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92 (3), 506–525.https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.3.506. ISSN 1939-1315.

[24] Barrett, Karen Caplovitz; Zahn-waxler, Carolyn; Cole, Pamela M. (1993). Avoiders vs. amenders: Implications for the investigation of guilt and shame during toddlerhood?. Cognition & Emotion, 7 (6), 481–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699939308409201. ISSN 0269-9931.

[25] dos Santos, Margarida Amorim; de Freitas e Castro, Josefina Maria; de Freitas Lino Pinto Cardoso, Carla Sofia (2020). The moral emotions of guilt and shame in children: relationship with parenting and temperament. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 29 (10):, 2759–2769. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-020-01766-6. ISSN 1573-2843.

[26] Lieber, Eli; Fung, Heidi; Leung, Patrick Wing-Leung (2006). Chinese child-rearing beliefs: Key dimensions and contributions to the development of culture-appropriate assessment. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 9 (2), 140–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-839X.2006.00191.x. ISSN 1467-839X.

[27] Nisbett, W (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84 (3), 231–259.

[28] Kwak, Dong-Heon; Ma, Xiao; Kim, Sumin (2021). When does social desirability become a problem? Detection and reduction of social desirability bias in information systems research. Information & Management, 58 (7), 103500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2021.103500. ISSN 0378-7206.

[29] Huhtala, Mari; Kunnen, E. Saskia (2019). Moral Conflicts as a Motor of Moral Identity Development at Work: Self-Awareness and Micro Processes in Weekly Experiences. Identity, 19 (4), 258–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/15283488.2019.1670183. ISSN 1528-3488.

[30] Bostyn, D; Sevenhant, S; Roets, A (2018). Of mice, men, and trolleys: hypothetical judgment versus real-life behaviour in trolley-style moral dilemmas. Psychological Science, 29 (7), 1084–1093. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617752640. ISSN 0956-7976.

[31] Immordino-Yang, Mary Helen (2011). Me, my "self" and you: neuropsychological relations between social emotion, self-awareness, and morality. Emotion Review, 3 (3), 313–315. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073911402391. ISSN 1754-0739.