User:Nanhezhu/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article

edit

This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.

Lead

edit

There is a brief description of the topic of the article, but it is very short and needs to add more content. The article is relevant to the topic, and the last edit was on October 27, 2020, so there has been an update recently. The content is all related to the theme but there must be some deficiencies.

Lead evaluation

edit

Content

edit

The article is relevant to the topic, and the last edit was on October 27, 2020, so there has been an update recently. The content is all related to the theme but there must be some deficiencies.

Content evaluation

edit

Tone and Balance

edit

The article is neutral, and there are no any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position. Besides, the viewpoints that are not overrepresented. However, most of the information sought in there is biased towards women.

Tone and balance evaluation

edit

Sources and References

edit

The reference of this documents mostly use very formal sources, and most of them come from some newspapers and some official news websites.

Sources and references evaluation

edit

Organization

edit

The most article well-written, and it Is very clear and easy to read. Besides, there are not too many grammatical errors in this article.

Organization evaluation

edit

Images and Media

edit

Unfortunately, this article did not use many pictures to give people a visual impact, which is also one of its biggest shortcomings.

Images and media evaluation

edit

Checking the talk page

edit

This part is not particularly clear, there may be some cooperative parts.

Talk page evaluation

edit

Overall impressions

edit

This article is generally very good. Its advantage is that the structure is very clear and the source of the information is very correct. The disadvantage is that there are not many pictures that give people a visual impact. In some places, more evidence may be needed to support the author's point of view.

Overall evaluation

edit

Optional activity

edit
  • Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — Nanhe Zhu

  • Link to feedback: