Evaluate an article
editThis is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.
- Labor market of Japan : (Labor market of Japan)
- The reason why I choose this article is because I'm Japanese and want to know more detail about the labor market of Japan .
Lead
edit- Guiding questions
- The Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic
- The Lead section doesn't adequately summarize key points of its contents
- The Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections
- The Lead doesn't include information that is not present in the article
- The Lead is concise
Lead evaluation
editContent
edit- Guiding questions
- The article's content is relevant to the topic
- The content was last edited on 10 May 2020 and is up-to-date
- There is no content that is missing or content that does not belong
Content evaluation
edit
Tone and Balance
edit- Guiding questions
- This article is written like a personal essay that states a Wikipedia editor's personal feelings or presents an original argument about a topic.
- There is no any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position
- There are no viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented
- The article doesn't attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another
Tone and balance evaluation
editSources and References
edit- Guiding questions
- All facts in the article are not backed up by a reliable secondary source of information enough
- The sources are thorough
- The sources are current?
- I checked the links and they works.
Sources and references evaluation
editOrganization
edit- Guiding questions
- The article is well-written. It is concise, clear, and easy to read
- The article doesn't have grammatical or spelling errors
- The article is well-organized
Organization evaluation
editImages and Media
edit- Guiding questions
- The article doesn't include any images that enhance understanding of the topic
Images and media evaluation
editChecking the talk page
edit- Guiding questions
- There is no any conversation yet.
- This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale and has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. It is a part of any WikiProjects in Japan
- This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics so it is good article to study economics as well
Talk page evaluation
editOverall impressions
edit- Guiding questions
- It is well organized
- It is not too long and structure is very clear so it is easy to understand.
- The article can improve by putting more image and put more statistics.
- It is underdeveloped so we can improve more
Overall evaluation
editOptional activity
edit- Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback
with four tildes — ~~~~
- Link to feedback: