| This user has been banned from editing the English Wikipedia by Bishonen. Administrators, please review the banning policy before unblocking. (block log · contributions · Blocked for persistent topic ban violations (post–1932 U.S. politics), battleground editing, and personal attacks. See events that led to final block at Talk:Hillary Clinton presidential campaign, 2016/Archive 11#Mika Brzezinski's harassment.) |
|
Trail of Deletions
editMy Talk page is littered with a history of some of my edits or pages being marked for deletion. I think it is wrong to delete edits, especially if they are sourced to credible news sources. If all we are doing here is spreading information, why is there an automatic need to mark things for deletion ? Why is information threatening ?
I've copied some useful links and information below from somebody else's user page. I hope you find it helpful.
Helpful Links/Info
edit
|
Important links
editAaron Swartz on Wikipedia
editInternet activist Aaron Swartz wrote this about Wikipedia, which I found to be truthful : "an outsider makes one edit to add a chunk of information, then insiders make several edits tweaking and reformatting it." Writing generally of Wikipedia, Swartz separately added that, "The more frightening problem is that people love to get power and hate to give it up."