User:Ig510/Sex verification in sports/Mcox19 Peer Review

Peer review

This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

• Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username)
  • Ig510
• Link to draft you're reviewing:
  • User:Ig510/sandbox

Lead

Guiding questions:

• Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
  • there's no real lead, it's just the addition of diagrams
• Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
• Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
• Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
• Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

Content

Guiding questions:

• Is the content added relevant to the topic?
  • yes
• Is the content added up-to-date?
  • yes
• Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
  • no i think the images will be very helpful
• Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?
  • yes, it is providing information about intersex individuals who are an underrepresented group.

Tone and Balance

Guiding questions:

• Is the content added neutral?
  • yes
• Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
  • you are using like one specific person's interpretation of sex development but i think it's established enough to just be fact
• Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
  • no
• Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
  • no, it's just providing a diagram to clarify the text

Sources and References

Guiding questions:

• Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
  • do you have an actual source for the slide images, can you get it from stacey?
• Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
• Are the sources current?
  • from the 20th century but regarded as true and immutable
• Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?
  • i mean jost is a white man
• Check a few links. Do they work?
  • currently there are no links

Organization

Guiding questions:

• Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
  • i don't think you've added any new writing?
• Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
  • nope ^-^
• Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
  • yea

Images and Media

Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media

• Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
  • yes!!
• Are images well-captioned?
  • oh you do need to add captions, that'll be the writing you add
• Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
  • ? you will have to make sure
• Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
  • they will be

For New Articles Only

If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.

• Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
• How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
• Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
• Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions

Guiding questions:

• Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
  • yes!! the diagrams will make the concepts in the article much easier to understand for visual learners
• What are the strengths of the content added?
  • very clear diagrams, good representation of the concepts
• How can the content added be improved?
  • add the captions!! I think once you add the captions your addition will be perfect.