User:Gale Winters/Social judgment theory

Article Draft

Founders of Social Judgment Theory

Carolyn Wood Sherif

Carolyn Wood Sherif's academic and professional journey and her collaboration with her husband Muzafer Sherif in social psychology research. It details how Carolyn graduated with highest honors from Purdue University in 1943 with a BS in Science. She then completed a master's degree in psychology at Iowa State University where she was inspired by Muzafer Sherif's book "The Psychology of Social Norms." She took a job in market research but found the work unsatisfying. On Cantril's recommendation, she then took a position as a research assistant to Muzafer Sherif at Princeton. Their work together was highly collaborative, with them publishing many influential joint works under both their names, including the classic Robbers Cave experiment. Carolyn contributed significantly to their research but often did not take co authorship credit, which she later regretted.

Carl Hovland

Carl Iver Hovland, an American pioneer of communication studies, began his career as an experimental psychologist working on problems of classical conditioning and human learning. By age 30, when he turned to the fledgling field of attitude change research, he had already become one of the most prominent psychologists of his generation. The most important of Hovland's early studies focused on the generalization of conditioned responses. . In the 1930s, he also made important discoveries about the factors that influence the effect of memory on human memory performance, the effectiveness of alternative memory training methods, and ways to resolve motor conflicts. From 1942 until his untimely death from cancer in 1961, Hovland devoted most of his time to the careful study of the effects of social communication, employing research designs and analytical methods derived from the more sophisticated fields of experimental psychology. He is considered one of the most important social scientists of the 20th century mainly because of his contribution to this field. Wilbur Schramm (1963, p. 5) describes communication research in the United States and calls Hovland's research program at Yale University in 1950-1961 "the single greatest contribution". The American Psychological Association awarded Hovland its Distinguished Scientific Contribution Award in 1957 "for his original and provocative contributions to the scientific study of persuasive communication and belief and attitude change.".

Judgment process and attitudes

The following are some ways that SJT can appear in the context of social norms campaigns that target risky behaviors like drinking, smoking, and engaging in hazardous activities:

According to SJT, people should evaluate incoming messages in light of their preexisting attitudes and convictions. Social Judgment Theory shows that perceptual contrast is a valuable tool for campaigns that draw attention to the discrepancy between perceived and actual norms. For instance, the campaign can highlight this contrast to dispel misconceptions if people think that "everyone smokes at parties," but in reality, most guests rarely smoke. The significance of anchor points, or reference points, in people's decision-making processes that become amplified by SJT. Campaigns can offer relatable and unambiguous reference points to help people form their opinions about social norms. For example, presenting anecdotes or data regarding abstainers of alcohol or tobacco use can act as anchor points to solidify this idea.

Social judgment theory suggests that individuals assess incoming information based on their preexisting attitudes and beliefs, ultimately shaping their judgments and decisions.

Latitudes of rejection, acceptance, and noncommitment

Social judgment theory (SJT) is applied in "Kinky Boots," as seen in several points of the story. Firstly, the concepts of SJT's latitude of acceptance, rejection, and noncommitment reflect in the characters' attitudes and responses to outlandish ideals, such as the creation of durable yet stylish boots for drag queens. Charlie, the main character, first finds it difficult to embrace this new course for his family's failing shoe factory, illustrating the difficulties in broadening one's acceptance range.

The interactions between the characters also emphasize how SJT shapes people's attitudes and actions. In the narrative, Lola, the drag queen who works with Charlie, experiences differing degrees of acceptance and rejection from various people, demonstrating how people's opinions are molded by their preconceived notions.

Furthermore, as characters like Charlie and Lola go through personal journeys of overcoming societal expectations and embracing their authentic selves, the theme of self-acceptance is central to the plot. This examination of self-acceptance aligns with SJT's focus on how people internalize social norms and how that affects how they behave.

All things considered, "Kinky Boots" offers a wealth of illustrations that show how social judgment theory functions within the framework of social norms, personal identity, and interpersonal relationships. The musical provides insights into the intricacies of human judgment and the transformational potential of acceptance through its gripping story.

Ego Involvement

Lower subjective social status has been found to be associated with poorer self-reported global health across the age range, to poorer functional status among older people and to obesity and depression among youth. SSS also predicted subsequent change in overall health status over three years, and when subjective and objective status were entered simultaneously only SSS remained as a significant predictor of change in health status. To the extent that social class is more salient and central to identity in England, lower social status may engender stronger negative social emotions and SSS should show a stronger association with health among the British than among Americans. Associations between SSS and self-rated health could be artificial, due to mono-method bias contributing to shared variance between self-report of social status and of health, or to confounding of negative affect with SSS and self-rated health. To the extent that social class is more central to identity in England than in theU.S., perceptions of lower status should be relatively more emotionally charged and ladder rankings should have a stronger association with health among British than among American subjects.

Attitude Change

The present study performed a 2 2 among-topics test to have a look at how combining direct and oblique online opinion cues that accompany Facebook posts selling the COVID-19 vaccine affects audiences' psychological reactance to the posts and the way the reactance drives their vaccine hesitancy. SEM Supported H5. Individuals' stage of psychological reactance to a COVID-19vaccine promoting put up is positively related to their degree of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. The major aim of this look at become to look at the consequences of mixing direct and oblique online opinion cues accompanying vaccination-promoting posts on audiences' psychological reactance to the posts and their vaccine hesitancy. This suggests that, in place of moderating the consequences of on line opinion cues on audiences' records processing and vaccine hesitancy, audiences' pre-existing attitudes are probable to at once affect their processing of fitness data and vaccine hesitancy. Despite those obstacles, this have a look at demonstrates how combining direct and oblique opinion cues accompanying online health campaign messages impacts audiences' mental reactance to the campaign and unravels the underlying mechanisms.

Recent Studies Utilizing SJT

In the modern examine, the connection among worry and persuasion might be mentioned, and then fundamental theoretical strategies to worry appeals might be examined in detail. Current studies findings that cope with the connection between fear appeals and adherence to endorsed behaviors to protect towards COVID-19, and thereby prevent the rampant spread of the virus, might be tested. Several research have explored these domain names which consist of fear of contamination, fear of monetary result, coronavirus-related xenophobia, worry of the body, fear of vast others, and fear of state of being inactive, etc. As emphasized in element in the present day take a look at, using worry appeals have effectively persuaded many humans to avoid unnecessarily health chance behaviors and to practice greater appropriate preventive behaviors deemed useful in dealing with global health problems along with the present day pandemic. According to terror management theory, once in a while fear appeals based on intense health dangers can inspire individuals who advantage vanity from risky behaviors to preserve to show off the ones identical errant behaviors. During the present day pandemic, fear appeals utilized in fitness verbal exchange messages have utilized picture photos and frightening language to stimulate fear and to underline the terrible results of no longer following the advocated behaviors. Considering the findings display that restrictions growth medical temper disorders, it seems more affordable to choose public health messages that set off superb emotions instead of fear appeals that allows you to boom compliance with regulations and different preventive health behaviors.

The concept of conservatism and the political spectrum have a solid connection to the anti-vaccine sentiments observed in social judgment theory. To lessen anti-vaccination sentiments, people's perceptions of attitude change from acceptance to rejection, and intellectual humility can either narrow or widen their latitudes of rejection and acceptance. Anti-vaccination sentiments included disapproval of vaccines for several different causes. The four most common reasons are doubts about the effectiveness of vaccines, worries about possible adverse effects, and references to or beliefs about the superiority of natural immunity over vaccinations from pharmaceutical corporations, which earn huge profits from vaccinations. These four categories of anti-vaccine sentiments, which are not all-inclusive, sum up the leading causes of anti-vaccine sentiment in the public.  In terms of vaccine and mask mandates these violations of one’s freedom, particularly over a topic with a high degree of ego involvement, would likely lead to the anchoring of one’s attitude about vaccinations within the latitude of rejection. The connection between social judgment and vaccination attitudes plays a big part in the COVID-19 pandemic. Tweets and other social media content can give important information about how the public feels, thinks, and behaves concerning vaccination campaigns. To gauge public opinion, spot new trends, and evaluate the effectiveness of communication tactics, researchers and public health specialists frequently examine social media data, including tweets. Researchers can learn about various factors influencing people's opinions, including misinformation, personal experiences, cultural beliefs, and political ideologies, by looking at tweets about vaccines. Researchers should exercise caution when examining social media data and be conscious of the assumptions that underpin this type of research.