Davide King

| edit count | edit summary usage Davide King Active — Wikipedian ♂ — Name Davide King Born (1996-01-30) 30 January 1996 Potenza, Basilicata Nationality Italian European Union Country Italy Current location Potenza, Basilicata Languages Italian English Time zone Central European Time Current time Ethnicity European Italian Southern Italian Lucanian Race Mammalia Hominini Homo sapiens (human) Hair Brown Eyes Brown Handedness Right Sexuality Straight (pansexual) Personality type INTP Alignment Neutral good Family and friends Siblings One sister Pets Russian Blue (male cat) Hobbies, interests, and beliefs Religion None (atheism) Politics None (anarchism) Interests Everything Account statistics Joined 27 April 2013 First edit 11 April 2014 Davide King (born 30 January 1996) is an Italian Wikipedian and extended confirmed user (ECo) who has made over 120,000 edits as of April 2026. Political views “ While I believe proactive disclosure of personal opinions to be an important part of WP:NPOV one should not ever ask an editor to recuse themselves from a discussion on the basis of userbox content. To do so contravenes WP:NPA. To claim that a person's POV makes them incapable of serving the neutrality goal of Wikipedia is to make the false claim that some people are inherently neutral. Such a person does not exist. EG: centrism is an ideology. ” — Simonm223 Since some biased left-wing and right-wing users or IPs complained about this user's alleged bias, he likes to respond that he is the political version of Schrödinger's cat—being a leftist, centrist, and rightist, and at the same none of them. From left to right, he is an anarchist and libertarian because who would not want everyone to be free? He is a communist because in theory it looks like heaven on Earth (not so much in practice). He is a socialist and social democrat because who does not like the working class or a good underdog story? He is a progressive because progress sounds good. He is an environmentalist because the Earth is a pretty damn beautiful planet, it would be a real shame if it was to be destroyed. He is a feminist because women are better than men. He is an anti-fascist because fascism is bad (is he still allowed to say that? God, one cannot say anything anymore these days...). This user is a liberal because freedom and liberty are good. He is a centrist because both sides have crazies. He is anti-centrist because it does not mean centrism is free from idiots either. He is a Christian democrat because his country was ruled by them for almost 50 years, a cherry-picked version of Christianity is perfect, and whoever Jesus Christ was, he was a pretty chill good dude. He is pro-capitalism because it was a big leap forward from slavery and feudalism: it helped us to create so much wealth and progress. He is a liberist and supporter of economic liberalism because "Fuck the taxi and seaside lobbies!" (Italians would understand). He is a neoliberal because globalisation "ain't that bad". He is a conservative because some things were really better in the past, some traditions are very nice, and he would like to conserve all the progress and advances made by working-class and middle-class peoples. This user is a patriot and nationalist because one can ardently yet not uncritically love one's own country, history, and culture without having to denigrate those of others. He is an American-style libertarian because he is autistic and likes to be left alone and free. He is an anti-feminist because feminism gave us Margaret Thatcher and some other God-awful rulers. He is a reactionary because both classical liberalism and classical social democracy were better than whatever we have today, plus Italian football was better in 2006. He is a fascist (actually a super fascist) because he really dislikes the use of Anglicism in the Italian language, especially when there are such straightforward Italian equivalents. He is a neo—no sorry, I cannot do this even in tongue-in-cheek but I can say—this user is an anti-communist because "read my lips"—Communist regimes committed atrocities and that was not good. Got it? Good. “ Imagine thinking that rejecting "all involuntary, coercive forms of hierarchy" and supporting the claim that "human development flourishes when individuals engage in cooperative, mutually respectful relations that can thrive only when excessive differences in status, power, and wealth are eliminated" are bad things. ” — Davide King In short, this user just wants everyone to be free. I guess that is such a bad and biased thing! So to reiterate—who could possibly be opposed to that?