Reason: As discussed at the talk page for this article, it seems the sources used in this article are more about Willow Osborne than the group itself. They do have a somewhat significant following on social media, but that isn't what determines notability. I can't find any reliable sources that reference the duo itself, and the majority of the sources in the article are user-generated, including YouTube, Facebook, and LinkedIn, and as such don't count when determining notabilityAs an admin mentioned in response on the talk page, notability doesn't automatically extend to the band, and as such, an article about Osborne with a smaller section about the band is probably a much better option. The issue isn't Osborne's lack of notability, it's the lack of notability for the band itself.
Reason: No references or clear claim of significance. Reads like an advertisement and was created by a user with no other edits and "Geo" in their name. Used to be much more promotional, but appears to have since been whittled down to a stub.
Reason: Only an infobox for a seemingly non-notable character in an equally seemingly-not-notable soap opera that's still in draft form. Google only turns up results for a musician with the same name. (PROD reverted by the author with no explanation.)
Reason: No sources found, non-notable fictional character. PROD tag removed by IP with no explanation. Also see Danny LAR (at AfD) and Chester Joyt (moved to draft).
Reason: No assertion of notability, and no reporting from any independent sources. Appears to just be an autobiographical page with social media links. (Prodded by Archer1234, which was reverted.)
Reason: I don't believe this redirect name with quotes is necessary, especially considering the article Politically Incorrect (without quotes) already exists and covers a completely different topic (and links to a disambiguation page that leads to pol).
Reason: Hey all! I believe this article title should be simplified for a couple of reasons:# Concision: Per WP:CONCISE, we need to balance brevity with sufficient information. IOC Refugee Olympic Team may be the official name of the team, which was the rationale for the move to the current title, but I see absolutely no reason to essentially say "Olympics" three times in this title.# Consistency: WP:CONSISTENT says article titles should be consistent among similar articles. The team and their participation in 2016 and 2024 all start their titles with Refugee Olympic Team at while this is the only article starting with IOC Refugee Olympic Team at.I think this is a very clear case for both of these policy sections, but I would like to check for consensus from the community. Fire away!
Reason: This article appears to fail our criteria for notability of people. It currently has no sources, and I can't seem to find anything online other than social media profiles and an IMDb page. I also believe the author may have a conflict of interest due to the tone and level of detail, especially in the "Childhood and Youth" sections—and I advise them to review the information on that linked page.
