 | This page is a test version of a potential new layout for the Perennial sources project. It is a demo and not part of the live listings. See Talk. |
 | This source in a nutshell: Acclaimed Music is considered  generally unreliable. See § Summary. |
| type | website |
|---|---|
| status | generally unreliable |
| deprecated | no |
| blacklisted | no |
| recency | 2022 |
| Domain acclaimedmusic.net | |
| In source code Spamcheck tool | |
Acclaimed Music is a source that has been repeatedly discussed at the Reliable sources noticeboard. This page collects and links information about previous discussions and current consensus, and summarizes it here for convenience.
Summary
editAcclaimed Music is considered unreliable as the site is a self-published source with little to no editorial oversight. It often aggregates lists published by other notable publications.
Excerpt
editAcclaimed Music is a website created by Henrik Franzon, a statistician from Stockholm, Sweden, in September 2001. Franzon has statistically aggregated hundreds of published lists that rank songs and albums into aggregated rankings by year, decade and all-time. Lists that are submitted by readers to magazines or websites are excluded from the aggregation. Author Michaelangelo Matos writes that "Franzon's methods are imperfect, but as indicators of overall critical appeal go, it's hard to beat."
Discussions
editNotes
editReferences
editOriginal table row for comparison
edit(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)
| Source | Status (legend) |
Discussions | Use | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| List | Last | Summary | |||
| Acclaimed Music | |
1 2 3 4 A |
2022 |
Acclaimed Music is considered unreliable as the site is a self-published source with little to no editorial oversight. It often aggregates lists published by other notable publications. | 1   |