User:Akaza/sandbox/Archive 16

45°05.05′N 83°05.193′W / 45.08417°N 83.086550°W / 45.08417; -83.086550

D.R. Hanna underway
History
United States
NameD.R. Hanna
OperatorPioneer Steamship Company
Port of registryFairport, Ohio
BuilderAmerican Shipbuilding Company, Lorain, Ohio
Yard number346
LaunchedOctober 16, 1906
In service1906
Out of serviceMay 16, 1919
IdentificationUS official number 203676
FateSank on Lake Huron
General characteristics
Class & typeLake freighter
Tonnage
Length
  • 552 feet (168.2 m) o/a
  • 532 feet (162.2 m) p/p
Beam56 feet (17.1 m)
Depth31 feet (9.4 m)
Installed power
Propulsion1 × fixed pitch propeller
Capacity9,842 long tons (11,023 short tons; 10,000 t)
Crew31

History

edit

Background

edit

The gunship USS Michigan became the first iron-hulled vessel built on the Great Lakes, upon her launching in 1843, in Erie, Pennsylvania.[1] By the mid-1840s, Canadian merchants were importing iron vessels prefabricated in the United Kingdom.[2] The first iron–hulled merchant vessel built on the lakes, Merchant, was built in 1862, in Buffalo, New York.[3] Despite Merchant's clear success proving the potential of iron hulls, ships built from wood remained preferable until the 1880s, due to their lower cost, as well as the abundance of high quality timber and workers trained in carpentry.[4]

In 1869, shipbuilder Elihu M. Peck conctructed a revolutionary freighter in Cleveland, Ohio.[5] Christened R. J. Hackett, the wooden–hulled vessel would provide the blueprint for the modern lake freighter.[6] R. J. Hackett's hull featured a pilothouse and cabins forward, and additional cabins and machinery aft; creating an uncluttered cargo deck in betweem, allowing optimal access to the chutes of ore docks.[6]

Between the early–1870s and the mid-1880s, shipyards around the Great Lakes began to construct iron ships on a relatively large scale.[7] The most notable being the freighter Onoko, built by the Globe Iron Works Company, which became the largest vessel on the lakes upon her launch in 1882.[8] In 1884, the first steel freighters were built on the Great Lakes.[9] By the 1890s, metal had become a common hull material used on the lakes.[10] The development of the pneumatic rivet gun and the advancement of gantry cranes enabled shipyard employees to work at an increased speed, with greater efficiency.[11] This, combined with the rapidly decreasing steel prices, contributed to the rapid increase in the size of lake freighters in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.[12] The first 400-foot (121.9 m) freighter was built in 1895, the first 500-foot (152.4 m) freighter arrived on the scene five years later.[13]

Throughout the 1880s, the iron ore trade on the Great Lakes grew significantly, primarily due to the increasing size of the lake freighters, and the rise in the number of trips they made to the ore docks of Lake Superior.[14] As the railways were unable to keep up with the rapid production of iron ore, bulk freighters became integral to the region's iron ore industry.[14] By 1890, 56.95% of the 16,036,043 long tons (16,293,372 t) of the iron ore produced by mines in the United States was sourced from the region surrounding Lake Superior.[14] Freighters engaged in the iron ore trade frequently carried coal on upbound voyages to fuel mining equipment and infrastructure, while hauling ore when downbound.[15]

Design and construction

edit

Service history

edit

Final voyage

edit

Wreck

edit
D.R. Hanna's wreck from the stern

Notes

edit

References

edit
  1. Thompson (1994), pp. 31–32.
  2. Bugbee (1962a), p. 25.
  3. Bugbee (1962a), p. 24.
  4. Bowlus (2010), p. 85; Bugbee (1962a), p. 26; Thompson (1994), p. 32.
  5. Carrell (1983), p. 7; Carrell (1983), p. 12; Thompson (1994), pp. 22–26.
  6. 1 2 Carrell (1983), p. 12.
  7. Bugbee (1962b), pp. 48–50; Thompson (1994), p. 32.
  8. Thompson (1994), p. 31.
  9. Bugbee (1962b), p. 50; Thompson (1994), pp. 40–42.
  10. Bugbee (1962b), pp. 49–51.
  11. Stonehouse (1990), p. 65.
  12. Stonehouse (1990), p. 65; Thompson (1994), pp. 59–84.
  13. Thompson (1994), pp. 59–84.
  14. 1 2 3 National Park Service (2018), p. 16.
  15. National Park Service (2018), pp. 5–7.

Sources

edit