User:Afosorno/Tyler Mitchell (photographer)/Adriel824 Peer Review
Peer review
editThis is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.
General info
edit- Whose work are you reviewing? Afosorno's article on Tyler Mitchell (Photographer).
- Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Afosorno/Tyler Mitchell (photographer)
Lead
editGuiding questions:
- Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? The lead is not updated but in my opinion, it doesn't need to be.
- Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes it does the perfect job of introducing the topic, in this case the lead consists of the persons name, occupation, place and date of birth.
- Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? This is something I would quickly add also something I need to add to mine.
Lead evaluation
editContent
editThere has indeed been more content added to each different subject of the article. There were new details about his early life such as the fact he published a book at the age of 20. Not only does article have more content but it is also more organized due to the internal and external links that were added. I would suggest adding more background info that is detailed so maybe why Tyler became fascinated by photographer.
Content evaluation
editTone and Balance
editGuiding questions:
- Is the content added neutral? The new content is completely neutral and reliable as proven by the citations and links provided.
Tone and balance evaluation
editSources and References
editGuiding questions:
- Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? All new information is reliable. The sources consist of different publications and magazines which are perfect sources for a topic like this. Also, all links work just fine.
Sources and references evaluation
editOrganization
editGuiding questions:
- Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? New content is well written and concise. Overall, the article is well organized.
Organization evaluation
editImages and Media
editGuiding questions: If your peer added images or media
No new media was added.