United States v. Quality Stores, Inc.

United States v. Quality Stores, Inc., 572 U.S. 141 (2014), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that severance payments to employees who are involuntarily terminated during a Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceeding are taxable wages under the Federal Insurance Contributions Act.[1][2]

United States v. Quality Stores, Inc.
Decided March 25, 2014
Full case nameUnited States v. Quality Stores, Inc.
Citations572 U.S. 141 (more)
Holding
Severance payments to employees who are involuntarily terminated during a Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceeding are taxable wages under FICA.
Court membership
Chief Justice
John Roberts
Associate Justices
Antonin Scalia · Anthony Kennedy
Clarence Thomas · Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Stephen Breyer · Samuel Alito
Sonia Sotomayor · Elena Kagan
Case opinion
MajorityKennedy, joined by unanimous
Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.
Laws applied
Federal Insurance Contributions Act

Background

edit

Quality Stores, Inc., and its affiliates (collectively Quality Stores) made severance payments to employees who were involuntarily terminated as part of Quality Stores's Chapter 11 bankruptcy. Paymentswhich were made pursuant to plans that did not tie payments to the receipt of state unemployment insurancevaried based on job seniority and time served. Quality Stores paid and withheld, among other things, taxes required under the Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA). Later believing that the payments should not have been taxed as wages under FICA, Quality Stores sought a refund on behalf of itself and about 1,850 former employees. When the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) did not allow or deny the refund, Quality Stores initiated proceedings in the Bankruptcy Court, which granted summary judgment in its favor. On appeal, the federal District Court and the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed, concluding that severance payments were not wages under FICA.[1]

Opinion of the court

edit

The Supreme Court issued an opinion on March 25, 2014.[1]

Later developments

edit

References

edit
  1. 1 2 3 United States v. Quality Stores, Inc., 572 U.S. 141 (2014).
  2. Joondeph, Bradley (March 26, 2014). "Opinion analysis: Severance payments are wages – at least in most instances – for purposes of FICA". SCOTUSblog. Retrieved October 24, 2025.
edit

This article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the text is in the public domain.