Template talk:DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual

Category addition

An admin should put this template into the "Copyright user templates" category.Smallman12q (talk) 22:28, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

 Done Nakon 02:32, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Wikimedia licensing update

{{editprotected}} Please replace the text under the [http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html GFDL] in this template with under [[WP:Copyrights|Wikipedia's copyright terms]], per meta:Licensing update/Result. Thanks. Anomie⚔ 11:48, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

 Done — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 13:51, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Historical

I believe this template should be marked historical and deprecated. All contributors dually license their text contributions in accordance with the WP:TOU. That dual license is retroactive in accordance with the licensing transition of 2009. Accordingly this template is now both inaccurate ("I agree to multi-license my text contributions, unless otherwise stated" doesn't apply) and just wrong ("Please be aware that other contributors might not do the same"). It has a high potential to mislead or at least confuse those who see it on user pages. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 10:51, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

Template-protected edit request on 26 July 2021

I request that this template be moved to Category:Wikipedia copyright templates. It doesn't belong in Category:Copyright user templates it should be only for userboxes. Catfurball (talk) 17:34, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

See Template_talk:TextLicenseFreeUse#Protected_edit_request_on_26_July_2021. — xaosflux ^Talk 18:54, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Edit request for dark mode improvements

Please add the dark mode improvements from Template:DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual/sandbox in the main template. Waqar💬 14:08, 12 October 2024 (UTC)

 Done Sohom (talk) 20:38, 12 October 2024 (UTC)