Template:GAProgress

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Template documentationview edit history purge

This template should always be substituted – use {{subst:GAProgress}}.

This template is used on approximately 4,200 pages and changes may be widely noticed. Test changes in the template's /sandbox or /testcases subpages, or in your own user subpage. Consider discussing changes on the talk page before implementing them.

This template is a progress assessment tool for Good Article reviews. The user may adjust its parameters to indicate whether each of the good article criteria are met as a review progresses. It is a quick and simple template, in contrast to other more detailed review templates.

The syntax for all parameters is as follows:

y, yes, pass, good, ok, k, +, aye all produce a pass symbol:
n, no, fail, bad, nk, -, nay all produce a fail symbol:
?, ??, ???, dunno, question, huh, idk all produce a question symbol:
wtf produces Wikipedia's "I am out of my comfort zone" symbol:
hold and on hold produce the on hold symbol:
neu, neutral and und produce the neutral symbol:
blank or no input produces the unassessed symbol

Usage

This template should be substituted since the GA criteria are reviewed from time to time and this template may change.

Blank template for copy-pasting in one-line format

{{subst:GAProgress | prose = | mos = | reflayout = | reliablesources = | originalresearch =  |copyvio = | broadness = | focus = | neutral = | stable = | freeortaggedpics = | picsrelevant = }}

Vertical template for copy-pasting with commented reminders of full GA criteria 

{{subst:GAProgress
| prose = <!-- the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct -->
| mos = <!-- it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation -->
| reflayout = <!-- it contains a list of all references, presented in accordance with the layout style guideline -->
| reliablesources = <!-- reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph -->
| originalresearch = <!-- it contains no original research -->
| copyvio = <!-- it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism --> 
| broadness = <!-- it addresses the main aspects of the topic -->
| focus = <!-- it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail -->
| neutral = <!-- it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each -->
| stable = <!-- it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute -->
| freeortaggedpics = <!-- images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content -->
| picsrelevant = <!--  images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions -->
}}

Example

{{subst:GAProgress
| prose =            y
| mos =              n
| reflayout =        y
| reliablesources =  ?
| originalresearch = y
| copyvio =          y
| broadness =        y
| focus =            y
| neutral =          neu
| stable =           y
| freeortaggedpics = 
| picsrelevant =     y
}}

results in: