Template:Did you know nominations/Modern Woodmen Sanatorium

Modern Woodmen Sanatorium

edit
Birdseye view of Modern Woodmen Sanatorium
Birdseye view of Modern Woodmen Sanatorium
Created by PPriyix (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

PPriyix (talk) 13:56, 3 May 2026 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: None required.

Overall: Very intereting article, thanks for creating it. New enough, moved from draft space on May 3. Well sourced. So many hook options, but I like ALT6 the best. All of them work, though, so I'd be fine with any of them. There are too many images, so there is MOS:SANDWICH throughout. I suggest that you either remove as many as you'd need to remedy this problem, or use galleries. My other suggestion about your lead: It really isn't one. Leads should summarize the article, so please do that, and put the info from the first paragraph into the body of the article. Thanks for your hard work. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 18:56, 28 May 2026 (UTC)

@Figureskatingfan: The nominator hasn't edited since May 10th, and it's been weeks since then. What should be done here? Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 02:11, 2 June 2026 (UTC)
@Narutolovehinata5: I'm no DYK expert, but according to the rules (WP:DYKRR), "An article cannot be officially promoted until a reviewer has given approval to at least one of the article's hooks." I wouldn't promote it until the promoter responds to my review, anyway. The rules also state that a promoter has two months to respond: "Unpromoted nominations over two months old may be rejected at the discretion of reviewers and promoters. However, if a nomination timed out while it was waiting for a review or a re-review, consider reviewing the nomination rather than rejecting it. Articles on hold may not be timed out." My interpretation is that unless we put the nomination on hold and if there's no response in two months, I and the promoters can choose to reject it. I would think that means we need to wait until July 28. Is that correct, do you think? Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 15:58, 3 June 2026 (UTC)
@Figureskatingfan: DYKTIMEOUT exists, but in practice that's more of an upper limit and a nomination can be closed earlier than that. Given that the nominator hasn't edited since May 10 and it's been over a week since your review, it doesn't seem like there is a path forward for this unfortunately. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 00:17, 5 June 2026 (UTC)
@Narutolovehinata5:, when you're right, you're right, darn it. Wow, this is the first time I've had to reject a DYK nom. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 17:42, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

References

  1. Sagastume, Elmer (August 7, 2025). "Colorado Springs to begin major repairs on Woodmen Road and Academy bridge". KKTV. Retrieved May 3, 2026.
  2. "Colorado Springs Street Names, What do they mean?". Colorado Springs Real Estate & Homes for Sale. October 13, 2020. Retrieved May 3, 2026.
  3. "How Woodmen Road got its name - The New Falcon Herald". The New Falcon Herald. September 20, 2008. Retrieved May 3, 2026.
  4. 1 2 3 4 "On a Cough and a Prayer: The Tuberculosis Epidemic in Colorado Springs" (PDF). Colorado Springs Pioneers Museum. Retrieved May 3, 2026.
  5. 1 2 Pfeil, Blake (January 27, 2023). "All-American Ruins | History Colorado". History Colorado. Retrieved May 3, 2026.
  6. Gardiner, Charles Fox (1902). "The Sanatory Tent and Its Use in the Treatment of Pulmonary Tuberculosis" (PDF). Transactions of the American Climatological Association. 18. ISSN 1059-8685. OCLC 775151651. PMC 2262541. PMID 21408333. Retrieved May 3, 2026.
  7. Witherow, Leah Davis. "Treatments & Fads". Colorado Springs Pioneer Museum. Retrieved May 3, 2026.