Template:Did you know nominations/Illinois Institute of Technology Academic Campus

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. You can locate your hook here. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Jeromi Mikhael talk 13:20, 2 November 2025 (UTC)

Illinois Institute of Technology Academic Campus

edit
S. R. Crown Hall at the Illinois Institute of Technology campus
S. R. Crown Hall at the Illinois Institute of Technology campus
  • ... that the Illinois Institute of Technology Academic Campus (pictured) has been ranked as both one of the US's most significant architectural works and its least beautiful college campus? Source: (1) Schweiterman, Joseph P; Caspall, Dana M; Heron, Jane (2006). The Politics of Place: A History of Zoning in Chicago. Chicago, IL: Lake Claremont Press. p. 51. "During America's bicentennial year, the American Institute of Architects recognized the IIT campus - the largest and most significant collection of Mies buildings in the world - as one of the country's 200 most significant works of architecture." (2) Kaiser, Robert L. (September 13, 1997). "Mies-ly IIT Shrugs Off Ugly Tag Architects Vying to Alter `blah' Image That Sticks With It". Chicago Tribune. pp. 1, 1:1. "Now, in the current edition of a book called "The 311 Best Colleges," the Princeton Review ranks IIT as the nation's "least beautiful campus." The rating is based on responses to a survey of 56,000 college students, said the book's author, Ed Custard."
5x expanded by Epicgenius (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 748 past nominations.

Epicgenius (talk) 13:44, 19 September 2025 (UTC).

  • Article is new and long enough, external policy compliant, and is presentable. The hook is cited to a reliable source, short enough, and interesting. Image is fine and a QPQ has been carried out. @Epicgenius: My only concern is that the image should have an FOP tag, but other than that, we're good to go. Icepinner 15:02, 18 October 2025 (UTC)