- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. You can locate your hook here. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Darth Stabro (talk) 18:48, 9 February 2026 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Chama (album)
- Source: https://blabbermouth.net/reviews/chama: "...the tribal aesthetic that propelled them has been revived and given several thousand volts up its jungle-dwelling backside..."
- ALT1: ... that physical copies of Chama come with a short story about the premise of the album? Source: Igor Cavalera, Chama CD booklet, Nuclear Blast Records, 2025
- Reviewed:
- Comment: I believe the first one is the stronger hook, as I can't any link online to directly cite the booklet in the album.
Converted from a redirect by Jax 0677 (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.
Hurstbergn (talk) 20:21, 9 December 2025 (UTC).
- Not a review, but it's actually probably the other way around here: ALT1 is the stronger hook since ALT0 is reliant on knowing Soulfly to be interesting. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 13:41, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
- I can see that perspective too, I was just kinda worried about backing up the DYK with a proper source. On second thought it probably is a stronger hook on terms of people who may not be familiar with that genre of music. - Hurstbergn (talk) 14:12, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
I think we can get this approved, but we need to work on expanding the article a tad more. While more than the requisite length of 1500 characters overall (see WP:DYKLEN), I noticed that about half of the article's length comes from a primary source. I would encourage even just a minor expansion of two more sentences of independently sourced content, relying on the already cited sources. This would more firmly establish notability (which I believe this subject narrowly possesses). Ping me if you make that expansion, have questions, or think we should proceed without it. Best, ~ Pbritti (talk) 16:01, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
- I can see that perspective too, I was just kinda worried about backing up the DYK with a proper source. On second thought it probably is a stronger hook on terms of people who may not be familiar with that genre of music. - Hurstbergn (talk) 14:12, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
- @Hurstbergn and Jax 0677: Please address the above concerns. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 02:43, 29 January 2026 (UTC)
- @Narutolovehinata5 and Pbritti: I apologize for the long delay in working on the page, I've been kind of in an editing slump recently. I added another section with a couple new interview references, so it should be good to go for another check now. I once again apologize about the delay on this >_< - Hurstbergn (talk) 16:52, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
- @Pbritti: This nomination is turning two months old in a few days, so please give this another look. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 14:36, 4 February 2026 (UTC)
