Talk:Yngvi and Alf

Latest comment: 8 months ago by SergeWoodzing in topic Legendary?
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 0 external links on Yngvi and Alf. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:26, 16 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Yngvi and Alf. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:05, 11 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Legendary?

edit

I strongly believe we shoud avoid using the ambiguous word "legendary" when we are describing people of saga and myth, people who have never been proven to be historical. Changing short descrip. "Legendary" usually means great, admired, famous in modern English. SergeWoodzing (talk) 18:39, 30 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

I see where you're coming from but in the context of a neutral encyclopedia, I think most people would assume its literal meaning of something related to legend. "Legendary" is used by the parent list List of legendary kings of Sweden and widely used in similar articles. "Mythological" is also not without its own issues since when most people think of "mythological" and "Sweden" they will normally think of the Norse gods, so readers might be misled into thinking these are figures who are thought to have directed with Odin and other gods. I don't think the difference is worth fighting over here, but if you feel so strongly about it, I would suggest a WP:RM for the Swedish kings list (and perhaps for List of legendary kings of Denmark and any other as well). -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 19:58, 4 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
Stumbled here and agree it is bigger than any swedish kings. If we are discussing the English usage we might want to start with King Arthur for example who also is described as a "legendary king" in his article. Most in the category [Category:Legendary monarchs] would need an overhaul. 2A02:1406:1B3:DC0B:D883:82B6:2073:EEA3 (talk) 01:57, 5 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thank you! Most people will think great, admired, famous. SergeWoodzing (talk) 11:19, 5 October 2025 (UTC)Reply