Talk:Xylopsora canopeorum

The good article status of this article is being reassessed to determine whether the article meets the good article criteria. Please add comments to the reassessment page.

^{Date: 02:14, 24 April 2026 (UTC)}

Xylopsora canopeorum has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: April 5, 2024. (Reviewed version).

Fungi: Lichens Low‑importance

	Fungi portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fungi, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fungi on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FungiWikipedia:WikiProject FungiTemplate:WikiProject FungiFungi
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Lichen task force (assessed as Low-importance).

GA Reassessment

Latest comment: 1 month ago4 comments3 people in discussion

Xylopsora canopeorum

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review

Result pending

Per this discussion, this article was found to have been, at least in part, LLM-generated. Wikipedia cannot in good conscience reward LLM-generated articles with GA status. Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:14, 24 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Retain Since no actual issues with the article were noted in the above nomination, seems like a procedural retain close is appropriate. Silver seren^C 02:31, 24 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Procedurally delist per nom. This sends entirely the wrong message. Cremastra (talk · contribs) 16:07, 24 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Procedurally delist per what rules, Cremastra? Silver seren^C 22:25, 24 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Add topic