Talk:Wil Cwac Cwac

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the European animation work group.

Wales Low‑importance

	Wales portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television: British Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the British television task force.

Article name - proposed move

Latest comment: 16 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion

Shouldn't this be at Wil Cwac Cwac, with a redirect from the English title? After all, the external links all use the Welsh spelling. I propose a move. 86.143.48.55 (talk) 00:37, 26 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Seconded — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.32.108.59 (talk) 20:54, 5 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Seconded.

Wil Cwac Cwac is the original name. You wouldn't have Beijing redirecting to Peking now would you? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.32.108.59 (talk) 20:55, 5 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Yes, this article should be headed as Wil Cwac Cwac, seeing as that was his orginal name, with the English translation appearing later. Yet more anti-Welsh bias on Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.32.108.59 (talk) 19:13, 25 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Will Quack Quack redirected. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.148.27.158 (talk) 21:58, 4 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Add topic