Talk:We Day
Latest comment: 5 years ago by 65.94.170.98 in topic Undisclosed paid editing
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the We Day article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
 | This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
Puffery
editI removed this sentence from the lede: "Independent research found that 98% of WE Day participants believe they can make a difference, and 80% of WE Schools alumni report volunteering more than 150 hours each year." That first statistic is the most bubble-headed puffery I can imagine. -- Danny (talk) 01:42, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
WE Day, not "We day."
editSince WE is capitalized, it must be an acronym, so what does it stand for?77Mike77 (talk) 12:19, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
This article was affected by undisclosed paid editing. Please see WP:COIN § Potentially an undisclosed paid editor account for details. Feel free to remove anything from the article that is excessively promotional or improperly sourced. — Newslinger talk 06:26, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
- This was archived to Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard/Archive 157 -- 65.94.170.98 (talk) 04:09, 24 September 2020 (UTC)