GA Review
editThe following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: Sammi Brie (talk · contribs) 04:44, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Arconning (talk · contribs) 15:14, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
I will be reviewing this, comments will probably be finished in the next 72 hours! Arconning (talk) 15:14, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Sammi Brie Here are my comments^^ Arconning (talk) 13:57, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Arconning Done. I have some heavy RL right now, so clip scouring is not my highest priority. I do have additional material in GenealogyBank as well, but I can do that at any time in the coming days. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 07:46, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
Prose and MoS
Lead and infobox
- in order protect, in order to protect.
- While the station continues to be competitive, add comma at the end.
- have given the overall edge to WOOD-TV, might be too informal. Otherwise, have given WOOD-TV the overall edge.
History
- Federal Communications Commission (FCC), add comma at the end.
- and presided, add over.
- and Holland also were, and Holland were also.
- with construction of the station., add the after with.
- Gannett sent Argyle the, Gannett sent Argyle to the.
- You misread this one: the stations were sent to Argyle.
- until being removed, until it was removed.
The Battle Creek–Kalamazoo problem
- I suggest somehow splitting the first paragraph into two at least, so that it could probably be read better by other viewers.
- from their schedule, pluralize schedules.
- brokerage agreement by, change by to in.
- in June 1992 when WOTV became WOOD-TV., add comma after 1992.
News operation
- three hours on Saturdays, add comma at the end.
- revenue leader for most its, revenue leader for most of its.
- Price, a Republican, wikilink Republican.
- changes in the newsroom., possibly change in to to.
Technical information
- No issues, pass.
Images
- Images have proper licenses and have proper captions. Pass.
Refs
- Earwig picks up like 2%, nothing weird at first glance. Pass
- Manual check, everything seems okay! Pass.
Spotchecks
- References 5, 30, and 41 are okay for random checks.
- All references come from pretty reliable sources.
- If you could find online links for the sources that don't have them, that would be nice. Though a source is a source, pass.
Misc.
- No ongoing edit war, pretty broad information about the topic, neutral. Pass.
Good Article review progress box
|
