Talk:WE Charity
Latest comment: 4 years ago by PrimeBOT in topic Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the WE Charity article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 5 years  |
 | Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
 | This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
 | This article has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
edit
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Michalisk22.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 12:34, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
This article was affected by undisclosed paid editing. Please see WP:COIN § Potentially an undisclosed paid editor account for details. Feel free to remove anything from the article that is excessively promotional or improperly sourced. — Newslinger talk 06:26, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
- This was archived to Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard/Archive 157 -- 65.94.170.98 (talk) 04:22, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Replaced Globe and Mail link concerning Wikipedia sockpuppetry with an archive link
editThe current link is impossible to read unless you're a member of the site. TheKing'sMongrelSon (talk) 22:43, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
- Hi TheKing'sMongrelSon and thanks for highlighting this. References on Wikipedia are allowed as long as they're published, which includes sources behind paywalls, sources not available online etc. It's unfortunate but out of our control that many good sources of information are behind paywalls and other barriers. However, I've manually run the bot that archives links on this page so that an archive link is there in the reference. I've also expanded the citation a bit to include the title, newspaper name, authors and date – this helps people work out what the reference is if The Globe and Mail change their website layout and URL formats, or if they are trying to search on a database that includes newspaper articles (e.g. one you might have access to as a member of a university). Let me know if you have any questions! — Bilorv (talk) 01:03, 14 November 2020 (UTC)