Talk:Viola fuscoviolacea

Comments left by AfC reviewers

• Comment: seems notable, but why do the references not have 'live links'? Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 14:07, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

• Comment: In accordance with Wikipedia's Conflict of interest guideline, I disclose that I have a conflict of interest regarding the subject of this article. Bbgordon (talk) 01:46, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Requested move 16 March 2026

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Not correct forum. This is not the correct forum for this type of discussion. Take it to AFD, redirect it, stub it, or whatever, but a move discussion isn't it. (closed by non-admin page mover) TarnishedPath^talk 10:41, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

---

• Viola fuscoviolacea → Draft:Viola fuscoviolaceaDraft:Viola fuscoviolacea
• ? → Viola fuscoviolacea

– This was recently accepted from draft but is not ready as none of the references can be verified. Restore the previous article that was here, which was swapped in the acceptance process. UtherSRG (talk) 20:22, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

• @Robert McClenon: what do you think of UtherSRG's concerns above? Would you be willing to self-revert your acceptance of the draft? Thank you, Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 21:19, 23 March 2026 (UTC)

  User:Rotideypoc41352 - I see that there is a problem, and I should have checked the references. I don't think that a self-revert is the answer, because I think that we need community input, and would prefer an AFD. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:57, 23 March 2026 (UTC)

  @Robert McClenon: should the article before the draft acceptance (now at Special:Permalink/1343823471) be restored before opening an AfD? I don't know if returning to the longstanding stable pagenames would make the AfD more confusing. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 22:10, 23 March 2026 (UTC)

If the stub were restored, then an AFD would be an AFD to delete the stub. I don't plan to do anything at this point so as not to make things worse. A lamppost has just fallen outside my townhouse, and I was advised to stay away from it, and I think that I should also stay away from this article so as not to get electric shock. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:51, 23 March 2026 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

I tried to add the missing URLs

I tried to add the missing links, but some of the references are to printed books. Some of the following references may be worth adding:

• https://vicflora.rbg.vic.gov.au/flora/taxon/867557e7-4a1f-4add-8634-0b8f0d7311d3
• https://apps.lucidcentral.org/plants_se_nsw/text/entities/viola_fuscoviolacea.htm
• https://bio-prd-naturekit-public-data.s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/species_assessments/Viola_fuscoviolacea_505057.pdf
• https://profiles.ala.org.au/opus/foa/profile/Viola%20fuscoviolacea
• https://plantnet.rbgsyd.nsw.gov.au/cgi-bin/NSWfl.pl?page=nswfl&lvl=sp&name=Viola~fuscoviolacea
• https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9460890/
• https://ipni.org/n/917476-1
• https://www.utas.edu.au/dicotkey/dicotkey/OTHERS/sViola_fuscoviolacea.htm
• https://avh.ala.org.au/occurrences/search?taxa=Viola+fuscoviolacea
• https://www.publish.csiro.au/bt/Fulltext/bt22072
• https://bio-prd-naturekit-public-data.s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/actionstmts/Dusky_Violet_AS_505057.pdf
• https://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/sitecollectiondocuments/rfa/regions/vic-gippsland/enviroment/biodiversity/vic_gipps_bio.pdf

DowntownUgarit (talk) 14:51, 30 March 2026 (UTC)